Cargando…
Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events
BACKGROUND: The mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) is difficult to assess accurately by 2D echocardiography because of geometric assumptions; therefore, 3D planimetry may offer advantages. We studied the differences in MVOA measurements between the most frequently used methods, to determine if 3D plan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30303687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0031 |
_version_ | 1783356171941314560 |
---|---|
author | Bleakley, C Eskandari, M Aldalati, O Moschonas, K Huang, M Whittaker, A Monaghan, M J |
author_facet | Bleakley, C Eskandari, M Aldalati, O Moschonas, K Huang, M Whittaker, A Monaghan, M J |
author_sort | Bleakley, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) is difficult to assess accurately by 2D echocardiography because of geometric assumptions; therefore, 3D planimetry may offer advantages. We studied the differences in MVOA measurements between the most frequently used methods, to determine if 3D planimetry would result in the re-grading of severity in any cases, and whether it was a more accurate predictor of clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a head-to-head comparison of the three most commonly used techniques to grade mitral stenosis (MS) by orifice area and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes. 2D measurements (pressure half-time (PHT), planimetry) and 3D planimetry were performed retrospectively on patients with at least mild MS. The clinical primary endpoint was defined as a composite of MV balloon valvotomy, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) and/or acute heart failure (HF) admissions. RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients were included; the majority were female (35; 85.4%), average age 55 (17) years. Mean and peak MV gradients were 9.4 (4) mmHg and 19 (6) mmHg, respectively. 2D and 3D measures of MVOA differed significantly; mean 2D planimetry MVOA was 1.28 (0.40) cm(2), mean 3D planimetry MVOA 1.15 (0.29) cm(2) (P = 0.003). Mean PHT MVOA was 1.43 (0.44) cm(2) (P = 0.046 and P < 0.001 in comparison to 2D and 3D planimetry methods, respectively). 3D planimetry reclassified 7 (17%) patients from mild-to-moderate MS, and 1 (2.4%) from moderate to severe. Overall, differences between the two methods were significant (X(2), P < 0.001). Only cases graded as severe by 3D predicted the primary outcome measure compared with mild or moderate cases (odds ratio 5.7). CONCLUSION: 3D planimetry in MS returns significantly smaller measurements, which in some cases results in the reclassification of severity. Routine use of 3D may significantly influence the management of MS, with a degree of prediction of clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6144931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61449312018-09-24 Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events Bleakley, C Eskandari, M Aldalati, O Moschonas, K Huang, M Whittaker, A Monaghan, M J Echo Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: The mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) is difficult to assess accurately by 2D echocardiography because of geometric assumptions; therefore, 3D planimetry may offer advantages. We studied the differences in MVOA measurements between the most frequently used methods, to determine if 3D planimetry would result in the re-grading of severity in any cases, and whether it was a more accurate predictor of clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a head-to-head comparison of the three most commonly used techniques to grade mitral stenosis (MS) by orifice area and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes. 2D measurements (pressure half-time (PHT), planimetry) and 3D planimetry were performed retrospectively on patients with at least mild MS. The clinical primary endpoint was defined as a composite of MV balloon valvotomy, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) and/or acute heart failure (HF) admissions. RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients were included; the majority were female (35; 85.4%), average age 55 (17) years. Mean and peak MV gradients were 9.4 (4) mmHg and 19 (6) mmHg, respectively. 2D and 3D measures of MVOA differed significantly; mean 2D planimetry MVOA was 1.28 (0.40) cm(2), mean 3D planimetry MVOA 1.15 (0.29) cm(2) (P = 0.003). Mean PHT MVOA was 1.43 (0.44) cm(2) (P = 0.046 and P < 0.001 in comparison to 2D and 3D planimetry methods, respectively). 3D planimetry reclassified 7 (17%) patients from mild-to-moderate MS, and 1 (2.4%) from moderate to severe. Overall, differences between the two methods were significant (X(2), P < 0.001). Only cases graded as severe by 3D predicted the primary outcome measure compared with mild or moderate cases (odds ratio 5.7). CONCLUSION: 3D planimetry in MS returns significantly smaller measurements, which in some cases results in the reclassification of severity. Routine use of 3D may significantly influence the management of MS, with a degree of prediction of clinical outcomes. Bioscientifica Ltd 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6144931/ /pubmed/30303687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0031 Text en © 2018 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Bleakley, C Eskandari, M Aldalati, O Moschonas, K Huang, M Whittaker, A Monaghan, M J Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title | Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title_full | Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title_fullStr | Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title_short | Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
title_sort | impact of 3d echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30303687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bleakleyc impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT eskandarim impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT aldalatio impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT moschonask impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT huangm impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT whittakera impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents AT monaghanmj impactof3dechocardiographyongradingofmitralstenosisandpredictionofclinicalevents |