Cargando…

Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators

Pollinator foraging behavior has direct consequences for plant reproduction and has been implicated in driving floral trait evolution. Exploring the degree to which pollinators exhibit flexibility in foraging behavior will add to a mechanistic understanding of how pollinators can impose selection on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briggs, Heather M., Graham, Stuart, Switzer, Callin M., Hopkins, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4303
_version_ 1783356183599382528
author Briggs, Heather M.
Graham, Stuart
Switzer, Callin M.
Hopkins, Robin
author_facet Briggs, Heather M.
Graham, Stuart
Switzer, Callin M.
Hopkins, Robin
author_sort Briggs, Heather M.
collection PubMed
description Pollinator foraging behavior has direct consequences for plant reproduction and has been implicated in driving floral trait evolution. Exploring the degree to which pollinators exhibit flexibility in foraging behavior will add to a mechanistic understanding of how pollinators can impose selection on plant traits. Although plants have evolved suites of floral traits to attract pollinators, flower color is a particularly important aspect of the floral display. Some pollinators show strong innate color preference, but many pollinators display flexibility in preference due to learning associations between rewards and color, or due to variable perception of color in different environments or plant communities. This study examines the flexibility in flower color preference of two groups of native butterfly pollinators under natural field conditions. We find that pipevine swallowtails (Battus philenor) and skippers (family Hesperiidae), the predominate pollinators of the two native Texas Phlox species, Phlox cuspidata and Phlox drummondii, display distinct patterns of color preferences across different contexts. Pipevine swallowtails exhibit highly flexible color preferences and likely utilize other floral traits to make foraging decisions. In contrast, skippers have consistent color preferences and likely use flower color as a primary cue for foraging. As a result of this variation in color preference flexibility, the two pollinator groups impose concordant selection on flower color in some contexts but discordant selection in other contexts. This variability could have profound implications for how flower traits respond to pollinator‐mediated selection. Our findings suggest that studying dynamics of behavior in natural field conditions is important for understanding plant–pollinator interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6144987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61449872018-09-24 Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators Briggs, Heather M. Graham, Stuart Switzer, Callin M. Hopkins, Robin Ecol Evol Original Research Pollinator foraging behavior has direct consequences for plant reproduction and has been implicated in driving floral trait evolution. Exploring the degree to which pollinators exhibit flexibility in foraging behavior will add to a mechanistic understanding of how pollinators can impose selection on plant traits. Although plants have evolved suites of floral traits to attract pollinators, flower color is a particularly important aspect of the floral display. Some pollinators show strong innate color preference, but many pollinators display flexibility in preference due to learning associations between rewards and color, or due to variable perception of color in different environments or plant communities. This study examines the flexibility in flower color preference of two groups of native butterfly pollinators under natural field conditions. We find that pipevine swallowtails (Battus philenor) and skippers (family Hesperiidae), the predominate pollinators of the two native Texas Phlox species, Phlox cuspidata and Phlox drummondii, display distinct patterns of color preferences across different contexts. Pipevine swallowtails exhibit highly flexible color preferences and likely utilize other floral traits to make foraging decisions. In contrast, skippers have consistent color preferences and likely use flower color as a primary cue for foraging. As a result of this variation in color preference flexibility, the two pollinator groups impose concordant selection on flower color in some contexts but discordant selection in other contexts. This variability could have profound implications for how flower traits respond to pollinator‐mediated selection. Our findings suggest that studying dynamics of behavior in natural field conditions is important for understanding plant–pollinator interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6144987/ /pubmed/30250676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4303 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Briggs, Heather M.
Graham, Stuart
Switzer, Callin M.
Hopkins, Robin
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title_full Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title_fullStr Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title_full_unstemmed Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title_short Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
title_sort variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4303
work_keys_str_mv AT briggsheatherm variationincontextdependentforagingbehavioracrosspollinators
AT grahamstuart variationincontextdependentforagingbehavioracrosspollinators
AT switzercallinm variationincontextdependentforagingbehavioracrosspollinators
AT hopkinsrobin variationincontextdependentforagingbehavioracrosspollinators