Cargando…
Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods
BACKGROUND: Cystoisospora suis is the causative agent of porcine neonatal coccidiosis, a diarrheal disease which affects suckling piglets in the first weeks of life. Detection of oocysts in the faeces of infected animals is frequently hampered by the short individual excretion period and the high fa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0097-2 |
_version_ | 1783356202967629824 |
---|---|
author | Joachim, Anja Ruttkowski, Bärbel Sperling, Daniel |
author_facet | Joachim, Anja Ruttkowski, Bärbel Sperling, Daniel |
author_sort | Joachim, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cystoisospora suis is the causative agent of porcine neonatal coccidiosis, a diarrheal disease which affects suckling piglets in the first weeks of life. Detection of oocysts in the faeces of infected animals is frequently hampered by the short individual excretion period and the high fat content of faecal samples. We analysed oocyst excretion patterns of infected piglets, evaluated different detection methods for their detection limit and reproducibility, and propose a sampling scheme to improve the diagnosis of C. suis in faecal samples from the field using a protocol for reliable parasite detection. RESULTS: Based on a hypothesized model of the course of infection on a farm, three samplings (days of life 7–14-21 or 10–15-20) should be conducted including individual samples of piglets from each sampled litter. Samples can be examined by a modified McMaster method (lower detection limit: 333 oocysts per gram of faeces, OpG), by examining faecal smears under autofluorescence (lower detection limit: 10 OpG) or after carbol-fuchsin staining (lower detection limit: 100 OpG). Reproducibility and inter-test correlations were high with (R(2) > 0.8). A correlation of oocyst excretion with diarrhoea could not be established so samples with different faecal consistencies should be taken. Pooled samples (by litter) should be comprised of several individual samples from different animals. CONCLUSIONS: Since oocyst excretion by C. suis-infected piglets is usually short the right timing and a sufficiently sensitive detection method are important for correct diagnosis. Oocyst detection in faecal smears of samples taken repeatedly is the method of choice to determine extent and intensity of infection on a farm, and autofluorescence microscopy provides by far the lowest detection limit. Other methods for oocyst detection in faeces are less sensitive and/or more labour- and cost intensive and their usefulness is restricted to specific applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6145109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61451092018-09-24 Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods Joachim, Anja Ruttkowski, Bärbel Sperling, Daniel Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Cystoisospora suis is the causative agent of porcine neonatal coccidiosis, a diarrheal disease which affects suckling piglets in the first weeks of life. Detection of oocysts in the faeces of infected animals is frequently hampered by the short individual excretion period and the high fat content of faecal samples. We analysed oocyst excretion patterns of infected piglets, evaluated different detection methods for their detection limit and reproducibility, and propose a sampling scheme to improve the diagnosis of C. suis in faecal samples from the field using a protocol for reliable parasite detection. RESULTS: Based on a hypothesized model of the course of infection on a farm, three samplings (days of life 7–14-21 or 10–15-20) should be conducted including individual samples of piglets from each sampled litter. Samples can be examined by a modified McMaster method (lower detection limit: 333 oocysts per gram of faeces, OpG), by examining faecal smears under autofluorescence (lower detection limit: 10 OpG) or after carbol-fuchsin staining (lower detection limit: 100 OpG). Reproducibility and inter-test correlations were high with (R(2) > 0.8). A correlation of oocyst excretion with diarrhoea could not be established so samples with different faecal consistencies should be taken. Pooled samples (by litter) should be comprised of several individual samples from different animals. CONCLUSIONS: Since oocyst excretion by C. suis-infected piglets is usually short the right timing and a sufficiently sensitive detection method are important for correct diagnosis. Oocyst detection in faecal smears of samples taken repeatedly is the method of choice to determine extent and intensity of infection on a farm, and autofluorescence microscopy provides by far the lowest detection limit. Other methods for oocyst detection in faeces are less sensitive and/or more labour- and cost intensive and their usefulness is restricted to specific applications. BioMed Central 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6145109/ /pubmed/30250747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0097-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Joachim, Anja Ruttkowski, Bärbel Sperling, Daniel Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title | Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title_full | Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title_fullStr | Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title_short | Detection of Cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? A comparison of methods |
title_sort | detection of cystoisospora suis in faeces of suckling piglets – when and how? a comparison of methods |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0097-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joachimanja detectionofcystoisosporasuisinfaecesofsucklingpigletswhenandhowacomparisonofmethods AT ruttkowskibarbel detectionofcystoisosporasuisinfaecesofsucklingpigletswhenandhowacomparisonofmethods AT sperlingdaniel detectionofcystoisosporasuisinfaecesofsucklingpigletswhenandhowacomparisonofmethods |