Cargando…

Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study

BACKGROUND: Due to brain plasticity a transection of a median or ulnar nerve results in profound changes in the somatosensory areas in the brain. The permanent sensory deprivation after a peripheral nerve injury might influence the interaction between all senses. The aim of the study was to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vikström, Pernilla, Björkman, Anders, Carlsson, Ingela K., Olsson, Anna-Karin, Rosén, Birgitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30231852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1152-y
_version_ 1783356206468825088
author Vikström, Pernilla
Björkman, Anders
Carlsson, Ingela K.
Olsson, Anna-Karin
Rosén, Birgitta
author_facet Vikström, Pernilla
Björkman, Anders
Carlsson, Ingela K.
Olsson, Anna-Karin
Rosén, Birgitta
author_sort Vikström, Pernilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to brain plasticity a transection of a median or ulnar nerve results in profound changes in the somatosensory areas in the brain. The permanent sensory deprivation after a peripheral nerve injury might influence the interaction between all senses. The aim of the study was to investigate if a median and/or ulnar nerve injury gives rise to a changed sensory processing pattern. In addition we examined if age at injury, injured nerve or time since injury influence the sensory processing pattern. METHODS: Fifty patients (40 men and 10 women, median age 43) operated due to a median and/or ulnar nerve injury were included. The patients completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile questionnaire, which includes a comprehensive characterization on how sensory information is processed and how an individual responds to multiple sensory modalities. AASP categorizes the results into four possible Quadrants of behavioral profiles (Q1-low registration, Q2-sensory seeking, Q3-sensory sensitivity and Q4-sensory avoiding). The results were compared to 209 healthy age and gender matched controls. Anova Matched Design was used for evaluation of differences between the patient group and the control group. Atypical sensory processing behavior was determined in relation to the normative distribution of the control group. RESULTS: Significant difference was seen in Q1, low registration. 40% in the patient group scored atypically in this Quadrant compared to 16% of the controls. No correlation between atypical sensory processing pattern and age or time since injury was seen. CONCLUSION: A peripheral nerve injury entails altered sensory processing pattern with increased proportion of patients with low registration to sensory stimulus overall. Our results can guide us into more client centered rehabilitation strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6145124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61451242018-09-24 Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study Vikström, Pernilla Björkman, Anders Carlsson, Ingela K. Olsson, Anna-Karin Rosén, Birgitta BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to brain plasticity a transection of a median or ulnar nerve results in profound changes in the somatosensory areas in the brain. The permanent sensory deprivation after a peripheral nerve injury might influence the interaction between all senses. The aim of the study was to investigate if a median and/or ulnar nerve injury gives rise to a changed sensory processing pattern. In addition we examined if age at injury, injured nerve or time since injury influence the sensory processing pattern. METHODS: Fifty patients (40 men and 10 women, median age 43) operated due to a median and/or ulnar nerve injury were included. The patients completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile questionnaire, which includes a comprehensive characterization on how sensory information is processed and how an individual responds to multiple sensory modalities. AASP categorizes the results into four possible Quadrants of behavioral profiles (Q1-low registration, Q2-sensory seeking, Q3-sensory sensitivity and Q4-sensory avoiding). The results were compared to 209 healthy age and gender matched controls. Anova Matched Design was used for evaluation of differences between the patient group and the control group. Atypical sensory processing behavior was determined in relation to the normative distribution of the control group. RESULTS: Significant difference was seen in Q1, low registration. 40% in the patient group scored atypically in this Quadrant compared to 16% of the controls. No correlation between atypical sensory processing pattern and age or time since injury was seen. CONCLUSION: A peripheral nerve injury entails altered sensory processing pattern with increased proportion of patients with low registration to sensory stimulus overall. Our results can guide us into more client centered rehabilitation strategies. BioMed Central 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6145124/ /pubmed/30231852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1152-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vikström, Pernilla
Björkman, Anders
Carlsson, Ingela K.
Olsson, Anna-Karin
Rosén, Birgitta
Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title_full Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title_fullStr Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title_short Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
title_sort atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury — a case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30231852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1152-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vikstrompernilla atypicalsensoryprocessingpatternfollowingmedianorulnarnerveinjuryacasecontrolstudy
AT bjorkmananders atypicalsensoryprocessingpatternfollowingmedianorulnarnerveinjuryacasecontrolstudy
AT carlssoningelak atypicalsensoryprocessingpatternfollowingmedianorulnarnerveinjuryacasecontrolstudy
AT olssonannakarin atypicalsensoryprocessingpatternfollowingmedianorulnarnerveinjuryacasecontrolstudy
AT rosenbirgitta atypicalsensoryprocessingpatternfollowingmedianorulnarnerveinjuryacasecontrolstudy