Cargando…

Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis

Distribution networks—from vasculature to urban transportation pathways—are spatially embedded networks that must route resources efficiently in the face of pressures induced by the costs of building and maintaining network infrastructure. Such requirements are thought to constrain the topological a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papadopoulos, Lia, Blinder, Pablo, Ronellenfitsch, Henrik, Klimm, Florian, Katifori, Eleni, Kleinfeld, David, Bassett, Danielle S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30192745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006428
_version_ 1783356286396530688
author Papadopoulos, Lia
Blinder, Pablo
Ronellenfitsch, Henrik
Klimm, Florian
Katifori, Eleni
Kleinfeld, David
Bassett, Danielle S.
author_facet Papadopoulos, Lia
Blinder, Pablo
Ronellenfitsch, Henrik
Klimm, Florian
Katifori, Eleni
Kleinfeld, David
Bassett, Danielle S.
author_sort Papadopoulos, Lia
collection PubMed
description Distribution networks—from vasculature to urban transportation pathways—are spatially embedded networks that must route resources efficiently in the face of pressures induced by the costs of building and maintaining network infrastructure. Such requirements are thought to constrain the topological and spatial organization of these systems, but at the same time, different kinds of distribution networks may exhibit variable architectural features within those general constraints. In this study, we use methods from network science to compare and contrast two classes of biological transport networks: mycelial fungi and vasculature from the surface of rodent brains. These systems differ in terms of their growth and transport mechanisms, as well as the environments in which they typically exist. Though both types of networks have been studied independently, the goal of this study is to quantify similarities and differences in their network designs. We begin by characterizing the structural backbone of these systems with a collection of measures that assess various kinds of network organization across topological and spatial scales, ranging from measures of loop density, to those that quantify connected pathways between different network regions, and hierarchical organization. Most importantly, we next carry out a network analysis that directly considers the spatial embedding and properties especially relevant to the function of distribution systems. We find that although both the vasculature and mycelia are highly constrained planar networks, there are clear distinctions in how they balance tradeoffs in network measures of wiring length, efficiency, and robustness. While the vasculature appears well organized for low cost, but relatively high efficiency, the mycelia tend to form more expensive but in turn more robust networks. As a whole, this work demonstrates the utility of network-based methods to identify both common features and variations in the network structure of different classes of biological transport systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6145589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61455892018-09-27 Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis Papadopoulos, Lia Blinder, Pablo Ronellenfitsch, Henrik Klimm, Florian Katifori, Eleni Kleinfeld, David Bassett, Danielle S. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Distribution networks—from vasculature to urban transportation pathways—are spatially embedded networks that must route resources efficiently in the face of pressures induced by the costs of building and maintaining network infrastructure. Such requirements are thought to constrain the topological and spatial organization of these systems, but at the same time, different kinds of distribution networks may exhibit variable architectural features within those general constraints. In this study, we use methods from network science to compare and contrast two classes of biological transport networks: mycelial fungi and vasculature from the surface of rodent brains. These systems differ in terms of their growth and transport mechanisms, as well as the environments in which they typically exist. Though both types of networks have been studied independently, the goal of this study is to quantify similarities and differences in their network designs. We begin by characterizing the structural backbone of these systems with a collection of measures that assess various kinds of network organization across topological and spatial scales, ranging from measures of loop density, to those that quantify connected pathways between different network regions, and hierarchical organization. Most importantly, we next carry out a network analysis that directly considers the spatial embedding and properties especially relevant to the function of distribution systems. We find that although both the vasculature and mycelia are highly constrained planar networks, there are clear distinctions in how they balance tradeoffs in network measures of wiring length, efficiency, and robustness. While the vasculature appears well organized for low cost, but relatively high efficiency, the mycelia tend to form more expensive but in turn more robust networks. As a whole, this work demonstrates the utility of network-based methods to identify both common features and variations in the network structure of different classes of biological transport systems. Public Library of Science 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6145589/ /pubmed/30192745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006428 Text en © 2018 Papadopoulos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Papadopoulos, Lia
Blinder, Pablo
Ronellenfitsch, Henrik
Klimm, Florian
Katifori, Eleni
Kleinfeld, David
Bassett, Danielle S.
Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title_full Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title_fullStr Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title_short Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
title_sort comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30192745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006428
work_keys_str_mv AT papadopouloslia comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT blinderpablo comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT ronellenfitschhenrik comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT klimmflorian comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT katiforieleni comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT kleinfelddavid comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis
AT bassettdanielles comparingtwoclassesofbiologicaldistributionsystemsusingnetworkanalysis