Cargando…

Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer

IMPORTANCE: Early esophagogastric cancer (OGC) stage presents with nonspecific symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a breath test for the diagnosis of OGC in a multicenter validation study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patient recruitment for this diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markar, Sheraz R., Wiggins, Tom, Antonowicz, Stefan, Chin, Sung-Tong, Romano, Andrea, Nikolic, Konstantin, Evans, Benjamin, Cunningham, David, Mughal, Muntzer, Lagergren, Jesper, Hanna, George B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0991
_version_ 1783356296990294016
author Markar, Sheraz R.
Wiggins, Tom
Antonowicz, Stefan
Chin, Sung-Tong
Romano, Andrea
Nikolic, Konstantin
Evans, Benjamin
Cunningham, David
Mughal, Muntzer
Lagergren, Jesper
Hanna, George B.
author_facet Markar, Sheraz R.
Wiggins, Tom
Antonowicz, Stefan
Chin, Sung-Tong
Romano, Andrea
Nikolic, Konstantin
Evans, Benjamin
Cunningham, David
Mughal, Muntzer
Lagergren, Jesper
Hanna, George B.
author_sort Markar, Sheraz R.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Early esophagogastric cancer (OGC) stage presents with nonspecific symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a breath test for the diagnosis of OGC in a multicenter validation study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patient recruitment for this diagnostic validation study was conducted at 3 London hospital sites, with breath samples returned to a central laboratory for selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) analysis. Based on a 1:1 cancer:control ratio, and maintaining a sensitivity and specificity of 80%, the sample size required was 325 patients. All patients with cancer were on a curative treatment pathway, and patients were recruited consecutively. Among the 335 patients included; 172 were in the control group and 163 had OGC. INTERVENTIONS: Breath samples were collected using secure 500-mL steel breath bags and analyzed by SIFT-MS. Quality assurance measures included sampling room air, training all researchers in breath sampling, regular instrument calibration, and unambiguous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identification by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The risk of cancer was identified based on a previously generated 5-VOCs model and compared with histopathology-proven diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients in the OGC group were older (median [IQR] age 68 [60-75] vs 55 [41-69] years) and had a greater proportion of men (134 [82.2%]) vs women (81 [47.4%]) compared with the control group. Of the 163 patients with OGC, 123 (69%) had tumor stage T3/4, and 106 (65%) had nodal metastasis on clinical staging. The predictive probabilities generated by this 5-VOCs diagnostic model were used to generate a receiver operator characteristic curve, with good diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve of 0.85. This translated to a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81% for the diagnosis of OGC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study shows the potential of breath analysis in noninvasive diagnosis of OGC in the clinical setting. The next step is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the test among the intended population in primary care where the test will be applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6145735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61457352018-09-24 Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer Markar, Sheraz R. Wiggins, Tom Antonowicz, Stefan Chin, Sung-Tong Romano, Andrea Nikolic, Konstantin Evans, Benjamin Cunningham, David Mughal, Muntzer Lagergren, Jesper Hanna, George B. JAMA Oncol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Early esophagogastric cancer (OGC) stage presents with nonspecific symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a breath test for the diagnosis of OGC in a multicenter validation study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patient recruitment for this diagnostic validation study was conducted at 3 London hospital sites, with breath samples returned to a central laboratory for selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) analysis. Based on a 1:1 cancer:control ratio, and maintaining a sensitivity and specificity of 80%, the sample size required was 325 patients. All patients with cancer were on a curative treatment pathway, and patients were recruited consecutively. Among the 335 patients included; 172 were in the control group and 163 had OGC. INTERVENTIONS: Breath samples were collected using secure 500-mL steel breath bags and analyzed by SIFT-MS. Quality assurance measures included sampling room air, training all researchers in breath sampling, regular instrument calibration, and unambiguous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identification by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The risk of cancer was identified based on a previously generated 5-VOCs model and compared with histopathology-proven diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients in the OGC group were older (median [IQR] age 68 [60-75] vs 55 [41-69] years) and had a greater proportion of men (134 [82.2%]) vs women (81 [47.4%]) compared with the control group. Of the 163 patients with OGC, 123 (69%) had tumor stage T3/4, and 106 (65%) had nodal metastasis on clinical staging. The predictive probabilities generated by this 5-VOCs diagnostic model were used to generate a receiver operator characteristic curve, with good diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve of 0.85. This translated to a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81% for the diagnosis of OGC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study shows the potential of breath analysis in noninvasive diagnosis of OGC in the clinical setting. The next step is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the test among the intended population in primary care where the test will be applied. American Medical Association 2018-05-17 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6145735/ /pubmed/29799976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0991 Text en Copyright 2018 Markar SR et al. JAMA Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Markar, Sheraz R.
Wiggins, Tom
Antonowicz, Stefan
Chin, Sung-Tong
Romano, Andrea
Nikolic, Konstantin
Evans, Benjamin
Cunningham, David
Mughal, Muntzer
Lagergren, Jesper
Hanna, George B.
Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title_full Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title_fullStr Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title_short Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer
title_sort assessment of a noninvasive exhaled breath test for the diagnosis of oesophagogastric cancer
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0991
work_keys_str_mv AT markarsherazr assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT wigginstom assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT antonowiczstefan assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT chinsungtong assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT romanoandrea assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT nikolickonstantin assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT evansbenjamin assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT cunninghamdavid assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT mughalmuntzer assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT lagergrenjesper assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer
AT hannageorgeb assessmentofanoninvasiveexhaledbreathtestforthediagnosisofoesophagogastriccancer