Cargando…

Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()

STUDY REGION: The SWAT model was used to estimate the combined effects of changing land cover, climate and Clean Air Act (CAAA)-related atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition to watershed nitrogen fate and transport for two watersheds in North Carolina, USA. STUDY FOCUS: Two different model simulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabriel, Mark, Knightes, Christopher, Cooter, Ellen, Dennis, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.05.004
_version_ 1783356300219908096
author Gabriel, Mark
Knightes, Christopher
Cooter, Ellen
Dennis, Robin
author_facet Gabriel, Mark
Knightes, Christopher
Cooter, Ellen
Dennis, Robin
author_sort Gabriel, Mark
collection PubMed
description STUDY REGION: The SWAT model was used to estimate the combined effects of changing land cover, climate and Clean Air Act (CAAA)-related atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition to watershed nitrogen fate and transport for two watersheds in North Carolina, USA. STUDY FOCUS: Two different model simulation scenarios were applied: one included CAAA-related atmospheric N deposition, climate and land cover (CAAD+C+L) and the other only included CAAA-related N deposition (CAAD) in simulation. NEW HYDROLOGICAL INSIGHTS FOR THE REGION: Results show both scenarios generated overall decreasing trends for nearly all N outputs between 2010 and 2070 which resulted primarily from CAAA-related reductions in oxidized N deposition. In both watersheds, including climate and land cover change in simulation resulted in a relative 30% higher NO3 load, 30% higher denitrification, 10% higher organic N load and a 20% smaller level of plant N uptake in year 2070 compared to not including climate and landcover changes in simulation. The increases in N transport for both watersheds indicates the combined impacts from climate and land cover change may offset benefits provided by the CAAA regulations; however, future NO(3) loads for the Little River watershed were small relative to current N loading rates. Conversely, the increasing NO(3) and organic N loads for the nearby Nahunta watershed were significant compared to current rates demonstrating that watershed nutrient responses to climate and land cover changes may vary significantly over relatively small spatial scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6145828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61458282019-08-01 Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin() Gabriel, Mark Knightes, Christopher Cooter, Ellen Dennis, Robin J Hydrol Reg Stud Article STUDY REGION: The SWAT model was used to estimate the combined effects of changing land cover, climate and Clean Air Act (CAAA)-related atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition to watershed nitrogen fate and transport for two watersheds in North Carolina, USA. STUDY FOCUS: Two different model simulation scenarios were applied: one included CAAA-related atmospheric N deposition, climate and land cover (CAAD+C+L) and the other only included CAAA-related N deposition (CAAD) in simulation. NEW HYDROLOGICAL INSIGHTS FOR THE REGION: Results show both scenarios generated overall decreasing trends for nearly all N outputs between 2010 and 2070 which resulted primarily from CAAA-related reductions in oxidized N deposition. In both watersheds, including climate and land cover change in simulation resulted in a relative 30% higher NO3 load, 30% higher denitrification, 10% higher organic N load and a 20% smaller level of plant N uptake in year 2070 compared to not including climate and landcover changes in simulation. The increases in N transport for both watersheds indicates the combined impacts from climate and land cover change may offset benefits provided by the CAAA regulations; however, future NO(3) loads for the Little River watershed were small relative to current N loading rates. Conversely, the increasing NO(3) and organic N loads for the nearby Nahunta watershed were significant compared to current rates demonstrating that watershed nutrient responses to climate and land cover changes may vary significantly over relatively small spatial scales. 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6145828/ /pubmed/30245973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.05.004 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Gabriel, Mark
Knightes, Christopher
Cooter, Ellen
Dennis, Robin
Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title_full Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title_fullStr Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title_short Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin()
title_sort modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the neuse river basin()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielmark modelingthecombinedeffectsofchanginglandcoverclimateandatmosphericdepositiononnitrogentransportintheneuseriverbasin
AT knighteschristopher modelingthecombinedeffectsofchanginglandcoverclimateandatmosphericdepositiononnitrogentransportintheneuseriverbasin
AT cooterellen modelingthecombinedeffectsofchanginglandcoverclimateandatmosphericdepositiononnitrogentransportintheneuseriverbasin
AT dennisrobin modelingthecombinedeffectsofchanginglandcoverclimateandatmosphericdepositiononnitrogentransportintheneuseriverbasin