Cargando…

Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights

A recent multicenter trial provided Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post-stimulation. Here we aimed to investigate the potential effect of nVNS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vecchio, Eleonora, Bassez, Iege, Ricci, Katia, Tassorelli, Cristina, Liebler, Eric, de Tommaso, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00366
_version_ 1783356365518929920
author Vecchio, Eleonora
Bassez, Iege
Ricci, Katia
Tassorelli, Cristina
Liebler, Eric
de Tommaso, Marina
author_facet Vecchio, Eleonora
Bassez, Iege
Ricci, Katia
Tassorelli, Cristina
Liebler, Eric
de Tommaso, Marina
author_sort Vecchio, Eleonora
collection PubMed
description A recent multicenter trial provided Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post-stimulation. Here we aimed to investigate the potential effect of nVNS in the modulation of spontaneous and pain related bioelectrical activity in a subgroup of migraine patients enrolled in the PRESTO trial by using resting-state electroencephalography and trigeminal laser-evoked potentials (LEPs). LEPs were recorded for 27 migraine patients who received active or sham nVNS over the cervical vagus nerve. We measured power values for frequencies between 1–100 Hz in a resting-state condition and the latency and amplitude of N1, N2, and P2 components of LEPs in a basal condition during and after active or sham vagus nerve stimulation (T0, T1, T2). The P2 evoked by the right and the left trigeminal branch was smaller during active nVNS. The sham device also attenuated the P2 amplitude evoked by the left trigeminal branch at T1 and T2, but this attenuation did not reach significance. No changes were observed for N1 amplitude, N1, N2, P2 latency, or pain rating. nVNS induced an increase of EEG power in both slow and fast rhythms, but this effect was not significant as compared to the sham device. These findings suggest that nVNS acts on the cortical areas that are responsible for trigeminal pain control and pave the ground for future studies aimed at confirming the possible correlations with clinical outcomes, including the effect on symptoms that are directly correlated with trigeminal pain processing and modulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6146235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61462352018-09-28 Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights Vecchio, Eleonora Bassez, Iege Ricci, Katia Tassorelli, Cristina Liebler, Eric de Tommaso, Marina Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience A recent multicenter trial provided Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post-stimulation. Here we aimed to investigate the potential effect of nVNS in the modulation of spontaneous and pain related bioelectrical activity in a subgroup of migraine patients enrolled in the PRESTO trial by using resting-state electroencephalography and trigeminal laser-evoked potentials (LEPs). LEPs were recorded for 27 migraine patients who received active or sham nVNS over the cervical vagus nerve. We measured power values for frequencies between 1–100 Hz in a resting-state condition and the latency and amplitude of N1, N2, and P2 components of LEPs in a basal condition during and after active or sham vagus nerve stimulation (T0, T1, T2). The P2 evoked by the right and the left trigeminal branch was smaller during active nVNS. The sham device also attenuated the P2 amplitude evoked by the left trigeminal branch at T1 and T2, but this attenuation did not reach significance. No changes were observed for N1 amplitude, N1, N2, P2 latency, or pain rating. nVNS induced an increase of EEG power in both slow and fast rhythms, but this effect was not significant as compared to the sham device. These findings suggest that nVNS acts on the cortical areas that are responsible for trigeminal pain control and pave the ground for future studies aimed at confirming the possible correlations with clinical outcomes, including the effect on symptoms that are directly correlated with trigeminal pain processing and modulation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6146235/ /pubmed/30271335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00366 Text en Copyright © 2018 Vecchio, Bassez, Ricci, Tassorelli, Liebler and de Tommaso. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Vecchio, Eleonora
Bassez, Iege
Ricci, Katia
Tassorelli, Cristina
Liebler, Eric
de Tommaso, Marina
Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title_full Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title_fullStr Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title_short Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights
title_sort effect of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on resting-state electroencephalography and laser-evoked potentials in migraine patients: mechanistic insights
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00366
work_keys_str_mv AT vecchioeleonora effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights
AT basseziege effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights
AT riccikatia effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights
AT tassorellicristina effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights
AT lieblereric effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights
AT detommasomarina effectofnoninvasivevagusnervestimulationonrestingstateelectroencephalographyandlaserevokedpotentialsinmigrainepatientsmechanisticinsights