Cargando…
A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screeni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001 |
_version_ | 1783356442121601024 |
---|---|
author | Vázquez, Manuel A. Mariño, Inés P. Blyuss, Oleg Ryan, Andy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Kalsi, Jatinderpal Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha Zaikin, Alexey |
author_facet | Vázquez, Manuel A. Mariño, Inés P. Blyuss, Oleg Ryan, Andy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Kalsi, Jatinderpal Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha Zaikin, Alexey |
author_sort | Vázquez, Manuel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). We use statistical analysis techniques, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, for evaluating the performance of two techniques that aim at the classification of subjects as either healthy or suffering from the disease using time-series of multiple biomarkers as inputs. The first method relies on a Bayesian hierarchical model that establishes connections within a set of clinically interpretable parameters. The second technique is a purely discriminative method that employs a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the binary classification of the inputs. For the available dataset, the performance of the two detection schemes is similar (the area under ROC curve is 0.98 for the combination of three biomarkers) and the Bayesian approach has the advantage that its outputs (parameters estimates and their uncertainty) can be further analysed by a clinical expert. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6146655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61466552018-09-21 A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer Vázquez, Manuel A. Mariño, Inés P. Blyuss, Oleg Ryan, Andy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Kalsi, Jatinderpal Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha Zaikin, Alexey Biomed Signal Process Control Article We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). We use statistical analysis techniques, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, for evaluating the performance of two techniques that aim at the classification of subjects as either healthy or suffering from the disease using time-series of multiple biomarkers as inputs. The first method relies on a Bayesian hierarchical model that establishes connections within a set of clinically interpretable parameters. The second technique is a purely discriminative method that employs a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the binary classification of the inputs. For the available dataset, the performance of the two detection schemes is similar (the area under ROC curve is 0.98 for the combination of three biomarkers) and the Bayesian approach has the advantage that its outputs (parameters estimates and their uncertainty) can be further analysed by a clinical expert. Elsevier 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6146655/ /pubmed/30245736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vázquez, Manuel A. Mariño, Inés P. Blyuss, Oleg Ryan, Andy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Kalsi, Jatinderpal Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha Zaikin, Alexey A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title | A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title_full | A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title_fullStr | A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title_short | A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
title_sort | quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezmanuela aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT marinoinesp aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT blyussoleg aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT ryanandy aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT gentrymaharajaleksandra aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT kalsijatinderpal aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT manchandaranjit aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT jacobsian aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT menonusha aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT zaikinalexey aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT vazquezmanuela quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT marinoinesp quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT blyussoleg quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT ryanandy quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT gentrymaharajaleksandra quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT kalsijatinderpal quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT manchandaranjit quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT jacobsian quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT menonusha quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer AT zaikinalexey quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer |