Cargando…

A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vázquez, Manuel A., Mariño, Inés P., Blyuss, Oleg, Ryan, Andy, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Kalsi, Jatinderpal, Manchanda, Ranjit, Jacobs, Ian, Menon, Usha, Zaikin, Alexey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001
_version_ 1783356442121601024
author Vázquez, Manuel A.
Mariño, Inés P.
Blyuss, Oleg
Ryan, Andy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
Zaikin, Alexey
author_facet Vázquez, Manuel A.
Mariño, Inés P.
Blyuss, Oleg
Ryan, Andy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
Zaikin, Alexey
author_sort Vázquez, Manuel A.
collection PubMed
description We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). We use statistical analysis techniques, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, for evaluating the performance of two techniques that aim at the classification of subjects as either healthy or suffering from the disease using time-series of multiple biomarkers as inputs. The first method relies on a Bayesian hierarchical model that establishes connections within a set of clinically interpretable parameters. The second technique is a purely discriminative method that employs a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the binary classification of the inputs. For the available dataset, the performance of the two detection schemes is similar (the area under ROC curve is 0.98 for the combination of three biomarkers) and the Bayesian approach has the advantage that its outputs (parameters estimates and their uncertainty) can be further analysed by a clinical expert.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6146655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61466552018-09-21 A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer Vázquez, Manuel A. Mariño, Inés P. Blyuss, Oleg Ryan, Andy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Kalsi, Jatinderpal Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha Zaikin, Alexey Biomed Signal Process Control Article We present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). We use statistical analysis techniques, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, for evaluating the performance of two techniques that aim at the classification of subjects as either healthy or suffering from the disease using time-series of multiple biomarkers as inputs. The first method relies on a Bayesian hierarchical model that establishes connections within a set of clinically interpretable parameters. The second technique is a purely discriminative method that employs a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the binary classification of the inputs. For the available dataset, the performance of the two detection schemes is similar (the area under ROC curve is 0.98 for the combination of three biomarkers) and the Bayesian approach has the advantage that its outputs (parameters estimates and their uncertainty) can be further analysed by a clinical expert. Elsevier 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6146655/ /pubmed/30245736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vázquez, Manuel A.
Mariño, Inés P.
Blyuss, Oleg
Ryan, Andy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
Zaikin, Alexey
A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title_full A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title_fullStr A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title_short A quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
title_sort quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6146655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezmanuela aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT marinoinesp aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT blyussoleg aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT ryanandy aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT gentrymaharajaleksandra aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT kalsijatinderpal aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT manchandaranjit aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT jacobsian aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT menonusha aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT zaikinalexey aquantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT vazquezmanuela quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT marinoinesp quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT blyussoleg quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT ryanandy quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT gentrymaharajaleksandra quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT kalsijatinderpal quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT manchandaranjit quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT jacobsian quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT menonusha quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer
AT zaikinalexey quantitativeperformancestudyoftwoautomaticmethodsforthediagnosisofovariancancer