Cargando…
“Top-down” Does Not Mean “Voluntary”
Attention researchers have long debated the roles of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in controlling attention. Theeuwes (2018) has argued that that top-down control is much less common than typically assumed and that a third mechanism—selection history—plays an underappreciated role in guiding vis...
Autores principales: | Gaspelin, Nicholas, Luck, Steven J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246170 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.28 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Critique of the Attentional Window Account of Capture Failures
por: Gaspelin, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The Risks of Downplaying Top-Down Control
por: Sisk, Caitlin A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evolving mantle convection from bottom up to top down
por: Mitchell, Ross N., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Commentary: Does not unexpected mean expected?
por: Huddleston, Charles B., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Seeing the Meaning: Top–Down Effects on Letter Identification
por: Evans, Gemma A. L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)