Cargando…

No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients

BACKGROUND: Simplification strategies of antiretroviral treatment represent effective tools for the reduction of drug-induced toxicity, resistance mutations in case of virological failure and costs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV(rtv)) or unboo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia, García, Coral, Viciana, Pompeyo, Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis, Fernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara, Espinosa, Nuria, Pasquau, Juan, López-Cortés, Luis Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30235244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203452
_version_ 1783356556453085184
author Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia
García, Coral
Viciana, Pompeyo
Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis
Fernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara
Espinosa, Nuria
Pasquau, Juan
López-Cortés, Luis Fernando
author_facet Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia
García, Coral
Viciana, Pompeyo
Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis
Fernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara
Espinosa, Nuria
Pasquau, Juan
López-Cortés, Luis Fernando
author_sort Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simplification strategies of antiretroviral treatment represent effective tools for the reduction of drug-induced toxicity, resistance mutations in case of virological failure and costs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV(rtv)) or unboosted atazanavir (ATV(400)) plus lamivudine, and if low plasma or intracellular ATV C(trough) influence virological outcomes. METHODS: Ambispective observational study in patients with undetectable HIV-RNA who were switched to ATV(rtv) or ATV(400) plus lamivudine once daily. Previous virological failures (VF) were allowed if the resistance tests showed major resistance mutation neither to ATV nor to lamivudine. VF was defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-RNA >200 copies/mL. Effectiveness was assessed by intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses. Plasma and intracellular ATV C(trough) were measured by LC-MS/MS. RESULT: A total of 246 patients were included. At week 48, the Kaplan–Meier estimation of efficacy within the ATV(rtv) and ATV(400) groups were 85.9% [95% confidence interval, (CI(95)), 80.3–91.4%] versus 87.6% (CI(95), 80.1–94.1%) by intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.684), and 97.7% (CI(95), 95.2–100%) versus 98.8% (CI(95), 97.0–100%) by on-treatment analysis (p = 0.546), respectively. Plasma and intracellular C(trough) were significantly higher with ATV(rtv) than with ATV(400) (geometric mean (GM), 318.3 vs. 605.9 ng/mL; p = 0.013) and (811.3 vs. 2659.2 ng/mL; p = 0.001), respectively. Only 14 patients had plasma C(trough) below the suggested effective concentration for ATV (150 ng/mL). No relationship between plasma or intracellular C(trough) and VF or blips were found. CONCLUSION: Boosted or unboosted ATV plus lamivudine is effective and safe, and the lower plasma C(trough) observed with ATV(400) do not compromise the effectiveness of these simplification regimens in long-term virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6147473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61474732018-10-08 No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia García, Coral Viciana, Pompeyo Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis Fernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara Espinosa, Nuria Pasquau, Juan López-Cortés, Luis Fernando PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Simplification strategies of antiretroviral treatment represent effective tools for the reduction of drug-induced toxicity, resistance mutations in case of virological failure and costs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV(rtv)) or unboosted atazanavir (ATV(400)) plus lamivudine, and if low plasma or intracellular ATV C(trough) influence virological outcomes. METHODS: Ambispective observational study in patients with undetectable HIV-RNA who were switched to ATV(rtv) or ATV(400) plus lamivudine once daily. Previous virological failures (VF) were allowed if the resistance tests showed major resistance mutation neither to ATV nor to lamivudine. VF was defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-RNA >200 copies/mL. Effectiveness was assessed by intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses. Plasma and intracellular ATV C(trough) were measured by LC-MS/MS. RESULT: A total of 246 patients were included. At week 48, the Kaplan–Meier estimation of efficacy within the ATV(rtv) and ATV(400) groups were 85.9% [95% confidence interval, (CI(95)), 80.3–91.4%] versus 87.6% (CI(95), 80.1–94.1%) by intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.684), and 97.7% (CI(95), 95.2–100%) versus 98.8% (CI(95), 97.0–100%) by on-treatment analysis (p = 0.546), respectively. Plasma and intracellular C(trough) were significantly higher with ATV(rtv) than with ATV(400) (geometric mean (GM), 318.3 vs. 605.9 ng/mL; p = 0.013) and (811.3 vs. 2659.2 ng/mL; p = 0.001), respectively. Only 14 patients had plasma C(trough) below the suggested effective concentration for ATV (150 ng/mL). No relationship between plasma or intracellular C(trough) and VF or blips were found. CONCLUSION: Boosted or unboosted ATV plus lamivudine is effective and safe, and the lower plasma C(trough) observed with ATV(400) do not compromise the effectiveness of these simplification regimens in long-term virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients. Public Library of Science 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6147473/ /pubmed/30235244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203452 Text en © 2018 Gutierrez-Valencia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gutierrez-Valencia, Alicia
García, Coral
Viciana, Pompeyo
Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis
Fernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara
Espinosa, Nuria
Pasquau, Juan
López-Cortés, Luis Fernando
No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title_full No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title_fullStr No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title_full_unstemmed No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title_short No difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in HIV-1-infected patients
title_sort no difference in effectiveness of treatment simplification to boosted or unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed in hiv-1-infected patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30235244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203452
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezvalenciaalicia nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT garciacoral nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT vicianapompeyo nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT milanesguisadoyusnelkis nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT fernandezmagdalenotamara nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT espinosanuria nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT pasquaujuan nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients
AT lopezcortesluisfernando nodifferenceineffectivenessoftreatmentsimplificationtoboostedorunboostedatazanavirpluslamivudineinvirologicallysuppressedinhiv1infectedpatients