Cargando…

Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks

The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryyppö, Elisa, Glerean, Enrico, Brattico, Elvira, Saramäki, Jari, Korhonen, Onerva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047
_version_ 1783356611182460928
author Ryyppö, Elisa
Glerean, Enrico
Brattico, Elvira
Saramäki, Jari
Korhonen, Onerva
author_facet Ryyppö, Elisa
Glerean, Enrico
Brattico, Elvira
Saramäki, Jari
Korhonen, Onerva
author_sort Ryyppö, Elisa
collection PubMed
description The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6147715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61477152018-10-05 Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks Ryyppö, Elisa Glerean, Enrico Brattico, Elvira Saramäki, Jari Korhonen, Onerva Netw Neurosci Research The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks. MIT Press 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6147715/ /pubmed/30294707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047 Text en © 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ryyppö, Elisa
Glerean, Enrico
Brattico, Elvira
Saramäki, Jari
Korhonen, Onerva
Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title_full Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title_fullStr Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title_full_unstemmed Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title_short Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
title_sort regions of interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047
work_keys_str_mv AT ryyppoelisa regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks
AT glereanenrico regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks
AT bratticoelvira regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks
AT saramakijari regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks
AT korhonenonerva regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks