Cargando…
Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks
The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MIT Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047 |
_version_ | 1783356611182460928 |
---|---|
author | Ryyppö, Elisa Glerean, Enrico Brattico, Elvira Saramäki, Jari Korhonen, Onerva |
author_facet | Ryyppö, Elisa Glerean, Enrico Brattico, Elvira Saramäki, Jari Korhonen, Onerva |
author_sort | Ryyppö, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6147715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MIT Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61477152018-10-05 Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks Ryyppö, Elisa Glerean, Enrico Brattico, Elvira Saramäki, Jari Korhonen, Onerva Netw Neurosci Research The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their spatial consistency, varies widely across ROIs in commonly used brain atlases. Here, we ask how ROIs behave as nodes of dynamic brain networks. To this end, we use two measures: spatiotemporal consistency measures changes in spatial consistency across time and network turnover quantifies the changes in the local network structure around an ROI. We find that spatial consistency varies non-uniformly in space and time, which is reflected in the variation of spatiotemporal consistency across ROIs. Furthermore, we see time-dependent changes in the network neighborhoods of the ROIs, reflected in high network turnover. Network turnover is nonuniformly distributed across ROIs: ROIs with high spatiotemporal consistency have low network turnover. Finally, we reveal that there is rich voxel-level correlation structure inside ROIs. Because the internal structure and the connectivity of ROIs vary in time, the common approach of using static node definitions may be surprisingly inaccurate. Therefore, network neuroscience would greatly benefit from node definition strategies tailored for dynamical networks. MIT Press 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6147715/ /pubmed/30294707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047 Text en © 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ryyppö, Elisa Glerean, Enrico Brattico, Elvira Saramäki, Jari Korhonen, Onerva Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title | Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title_full | Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title_fullStr | Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title_short | Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
title_sort | regions of interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryyppoelisa regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks AT glereanenrico regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks AT bratticoelvira regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks AT saramakijari regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks AT korhonenonerva regionsofinterestasnodesofdynamicfunctionalbrainnetworks |