Cargando…

Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population

BACKGROUND: Screening for cancer of the cervix remains a neglected health care issue in Pakistan. To provide baseline data for future efforts to improve screening, we conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical smears taken in the obstetrics and gynaecological clinics of the Aga Khan University H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasti, Shahnaz, Ahmed, Waleed, Jafri, Abbas, Khan, Behram, Sohail, Rizwan, Hassan, Sheema
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15307457
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2004.189
_version_ 1783356659726286848
author Wasti, Shahnaz
Ahmed, Waleed
Jafri, Abbas
Khan, Behram
Sohail, Rizwan
Hassan, Sheema
author_facet Wasti, Shahnaz
Ahmed, Waleed
Jafri, Abbas
Khan, Behram
Sohail, Rizwan
Hassan, Sheema
author_sort Wasti, Shahnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for cancer of the cervix remains a neglected health care issue in Pakistan. To provide baseline data for future efforts to improve screening, we conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical smears taken in the obstetrics and gynaecological clinics of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHOD: We collected data on cervical smear cytology for cervical smears taken from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1996. We assessed risk factors for dysplasia, including age, age at first marriage, and number of pregnancies. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of abnormal smears in our study was 0.5%. Of 20,995 cervical smears, 12,451 (59.3%) smears showed non-specific inflammation, 7302 (34.8%) were reported as normal, 809 (3.85%) showed monillial infection, 148 (0.71%) showed atypia, 105 (0.5%) had dysplastic cytology, and 52 (0.25%) samples were inadequate. The highest incidence of dysplastic smears was seen in the age group 35 to 44 years. Of 105 patients with dysplasia, 12 were pregnant, and all were asymptomatic, while in 93 non-pregnant women, 33 were symptomatic. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of abnormal smears, compared with data from Western populations, could be due to the inherent bias of health awareness in the women who attended our hospital. The results of this study may serve as a baseline for future comparisons. A larger community-based study may establish the exact prevalence of malignant and premalignant lesions so as to plan for future screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6147930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61479302018-09-21 Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population Wasti, Shahnaz Ahmed, Waleed Jafri, Abbas Khan, Behram Sohail, Rizwan Hassan, Sheema Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Screening for cancer of the cervix remains a neglected health care issue in Pakistan. To provide baseline data for future efforts to improve screening, we conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical smears taken in the obstetrics and gynaecological clinics of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHOD: We collected data on cervical smear cytology for cervical smears taken from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1996. We assessed risk factors for dysplasia, including age, age at first marriage, and number of pregnancies. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of abnormal smears in our study was 0.5%. Of 20,995 cervical smears, 12,451 (59.3%) smears showed non-specific inflammation, 7302 (34.8%) were reported as normal, 809 (3.85%) showed monillial infection, 148 (0.71%) showed atypia, 105 (0.5%) had dysplastic cytology, and 52 (0.25%) samples were inadequate. The highest incidence of dysplastic smears was seen in the age group 35 to 44 years. Of 105 patients with dysplasia, 12 were pregnant, and all were asymptomatic, while in 93 non-pregnant women, 33 were symptomatic. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of abnormal smears, compared with data from Western populations, could be due to the inherent bias of health awareness in the women who attended our hospital. The results of this study may serve as a baseline for future comparisons. A larger community-based study may establish the exact prevalence of malignant and premalignant lesions so as to plan for future screening. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2004 /pmc/articles/PMC6147930/ /pubmed/15307457 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2004.189 Text en Copyright © 2004, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wasti, Shahnaz
Ahmed, Waleed
Jafri, Abbas
Khan, Behram
Sohail, Rizwan
Hassan, Sheema
Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title_full Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title_fullStr Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title_short Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population
title_sort analysis of cervical smears in a muslim population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15307457
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2004.189
work_keys_str_mv AT wastishahnaz analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation
AT ahmedwaleed analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation
AT jafriabbas analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation
AT khanbehram analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation
AT sohailrizwan analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation
AT hassansheema analysisofcervicalsmearsinamuslimpopulation