Cargando…

Evaluation of left ventricular function and volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: gated myocardial single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) versus echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular function, volumes and regional wall motion provide valuable diagnostic information and are of long-term prognostic importance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of 2D-echocardiography and gated single-photo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berk, Fatma, Isgoren, Serkan, Demir, Hakan, Kozdag, Guliz, Ural, Dilek, Komsuoglu, Baki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16119519
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2005.198
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Left ventricular function, volumes and regional wall motion provide valuable diagnostic information and are of long-term prognostic importance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of 2D-echocardiography and gated single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) for evaluation of these parameters in patients with DCM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gated SPECT and 2D-echocardiography were performed in 33 patients having DCM. Gated SPECT data, including left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were processed using an automated algorithm. Standard technique was used for 2D-echocardiography. Regional wall motion was evaluated using both modalities and was scored by two independent observers using a 16-segment model with a 5-point scoring system. RESULTS: The overall agreement between the two imaging modalities for the assessment of regional wall motion was 56% (298/528 segments). With gated SPECT, LVEF, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) were 27±9%, 217±77 mL, and 163±73 mL, respectively, and 30±8%, 195±58 mL, and 137±48 mL with echocardiography. The correlation between gated SPECT and 2D-echocardiography was good (r=0.76, P<0.01) for the assessment of LVEF. The correlation for EDV and ESV were also good, but with wider limits of agreement (r=0.72, P<0.01 and r=0.73, P<0.01, respectively) and significantly higher values were obtained with gated SPECT (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Gated SPECT and 2D-echocardiography correlate well for the assessment of LV function and LV volumes. Like 2D-echocardiography, gated SPECT provides reliable information about LV function and dimension with the additional advantage of perfusion data.