Cargando…
The hydrogen atom transfer reactivity of sulfinic acids
Sulfinic acids (RSO(2)H) have a reputation for being difficult reagents due to their facile autoxidation. Nevertheless, they have recently been employed as key reagents in a variety of useful radical chain reactions. To account for this paradox and enable further development of radical reactions emp...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal Society of Chemistry
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30288241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8sc02400f |
Sumario: | Sulfinic acids (RSO(2)H) have a reputation for being difficult reagents due to their facile autoxidation. Nevertheless, they have recently been employed as key reagents in a variety of useful radical chain reactions. To account for this paradox and enable further development of radical reactions employing sulfinic acids, we have characterized the thermodynamics and kinetics of their H-atom transfer reactions for the first time. The O–H bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE) of sulfinic acids was determined by radical equilibration to be ∼78 kcal mol(–1); roughly halfway between the RS-H BDE in thiols (∼87 kcal mol(–1)) and RSO-H BDE in sulfenic acids (∼70 kcal mol(–1)). Regardless, RSH, RSOH and RSO(2)H have relatively similar inherent H-atom transfer reactivity to alkyl radicals (∼10(6) M(–1) s(–1)). Counter-intuitively, the trend in rate constants with more reactive alkoxyl radicals follows the reaction energetics: ∼10(8) M(–1) s(–1) for RSO(2)H, midway between thiols (∼10(7) M(–1) s(–1)) and sulfenic acids (∼10(9) M(–1) s(–1)). Importantly, since sulfinic and sulfenic acids are very strong H-bond donors (αH2 ∼ 0.63 and 0.55, respectively), their reactivity is greatly attenuated in H-bond accepting solvents, whereas the reactivity of thiols is largely solvent-independent. Efforts to measure rate constants for the reactions of sulfinic acids with alkylperoxyl radicals were unsuccessful. Computations predict these reactions to be surprisingly slow; ∼1000-times slower than for thiols and ∼10 000 000-times slower than for sulfenic acids. On the other hand, the reaction of sulfinic acids with sulfonylperoxyl radicals – which propagate sulfinic acid autoxidation – is predicted to be almost diffusion-controlled. In fact, the rate-determining step in sulfinic acid autoxidation, and the reason they can be used for productive chemistry, is the relatively slow reaction of propagating sulfonyl radicals with O(2) (∼10(6) M(–1) s(–1)). |
---|