Cargando…
A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6149054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7 |
_version_ | 1783356810615324672 |
---|---|
author | White, Alan Ironmonger, Lucy Steele, Robert J. C. Ormiston-Smith, Nick Crawford, Carina Seims, Amanda |
author_facet | White, Alan Ironmonger, Lucy Steele, Robert J. C. Ormiston-Smith, Nick Crawford, Carina Seims, Amanda |
author_sort | White, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. RESULTS: Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6149054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61490542018-09-26 A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK White, Alan Ironmonger, Lucy Steele, Robert J. C. Ormiston-Smith, Nick Crawford, Carina Seims, Amanda BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. RESULTS: Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women. BioMed Central 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6149054/ /pubmed/30236083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article White, Alan Ironmonger, Lucy Steele, Robert J. C. Ormiston-Smith, Nick Crawford, Carina Seims, Amanda A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title | A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title_full | A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title_fullStr | A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title_short | A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK |
title_sort | review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the uk |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6149054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitealan areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT ironmongerlucy areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT steelerobertjc areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT ormistonsmithnick areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT crawfordcarina areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT seimsamanda areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT whitealan reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT ironmongerlucy reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT steelerobertjc reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT ormistonsmithnick reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT crawfordcarina reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk AT seimsamanda reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk |