Cargando…

A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Alan, Ironmonger, Lucy, Steele, Robert J. C., Ormiston-Smith, Nick, Crawford, Carina, Seims, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6149054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7
_version_ 1783356810615324672
author White, Alan
Ironmonger, Lucy
Steele, Robert J. C.
Ormiston-Smith, Nick
Crawford, Carina
Seims, Amanda
author_facet White, Alan
Ironmonger, Lucy
Steele, Robert J. C.
Ormiston-Smith, Nick
Crawford, Carina
Seims, Amanda
author_sort White, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. RESULTS: Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6149054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61490542018-09-26 A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK White, Alan Ironmonger, Lucy Steele, Robert J. C. Ormiston-Smith, Nick Crawford, Carina Seims, Amanda BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. METHODS: A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. RESULTS: Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women. BioMed Central 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6149054/ /pubmed/30236083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
White, Alan
Ironmonger, Lucy
Steele, Robert J. C.
Ormiston-Smith, Nick
Crawford, Carina
Seims, Amanda
A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title_full A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title_fullStr A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title_full_unstemmed A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title_short A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK
title_sort review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the uk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6149054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7
work_keys_str_mv AT whitealan areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT ironmongerlucy areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT steelerobertjc areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT ormistonsmithnick areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT crawfordcarina areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT seimsamanda areviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT whitealan reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT ironmongerlucy reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT steelerobertjc reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT ormistonsmithnick reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT crawfordcarina reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk
AT seimsamanda reviewofsexrelateddifferencesincolorectalcancerincidencescreeninguptakeroutestodiagnosiscancerstageandsurvivalintheuk