Cargando…

Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China

INTRODUCTION: Despite policy measure to strengthen and promote primary care, Chinese patients increasingly choose to access higher level hospitals. The resulting overcrowding at higher level hospitals and underutilisation of primary care are viewed to diminish the effects of the continuing health sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yun, Zhong, Liwei, Yuan, Shasha, van de Klundert, Joris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000854
_version_ 1783356928481558528
author Liu, Yun
Zhong, Liwei
Yuan, Shasha
van de Klundert, Joris
author_facet Liu, Yun
Zhong, Liwei
Yuan, Shasha
van de Klundert, Joris
author_sort Liu, Yun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite policy measure to strengthen and promote primary care, Chinese patients increasingly choose to access higher level hospitals. The resulting overcrowding at higher level hospitals and underutilisation of primary care are viewed to diminish the effects of the continuing health system investments on population health. We explore the factors that influence the choice of healthcare facility level in rural and urban China and aim to reveal the underlying choice processes. METHODS: We conducted eight semistructured focus group discussions among the general population and the chronically ill in a rural area in Chongqing and an urban area in Shanghai. Respondents’ discussions of (evidence-based) factors and how they influenced their facility choices were analysed using qualitative analysis techniques, from which we elicited choice process maps to capture the partial order in which the factors were considered in the choice process. RESULTS: The factors considered, after initial illness perception, varied over four stages of health service utilisation: initial visit, diagnosis, treatment and treatment continuation. The factors considered per stage differed considerably between the rural and urban respondents, but less so between the general population and the chronically ill. Moreover, the rural respondents considered the township health centres as default and prefer to continue in primary care, yet access higher levels when necessary. Urban respondents chose higher levels by default and seldom moved down to primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity, medical staff, transportation convenience, equipment and drug availability played important roles when choosing healthcare facilities in China. Strengthening primary care correspondingly may well be effective to increase primary care utilisation by the rural population but insufficient for the urban population. The developed four-stage process maps are general enough to serve as the basis for (partially) ordering factors influencing facility level choices in other contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61501332018-09-26 Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China Liu, Yun Zhong, Liwei Yuan, Shasha van de Klundert, Joris BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Despite policy measure to strengthen and promote primary care, Chinese patients increasingly choose to access higher level hospitals. The resulting overcrowding at higher level hospitals and underutilisation of primary care are viewed to diminish the effects of the continuing health system investments on population health. We explore the factors that influence the choice of healthcare facility level in rural and urban China and aim to reveal the underlying choice processes. METHODS: We conducted eight semistructured focus group discussions among the general population and the chronically ill in a rural area in Chongqing and an urban area in Shanghai. Respondents’ discussions of (evidence-based) factors and how they influenced their facility choices were analysed using qualitative analysis techniques, from which we elicited choice process maps to capture the partial order in which the factors were considered in the choice process. RESULTS: The factors considered, after initial illness perception, varied over four stages of health service utilisation: initial visit, diagnosis, treatment and treatment continuation. The factors considered per stage differed considerably between the rural and urban respondents, but less so between the general population and the chronically ill. Moreover, the rural respondents considered the township health centres as default and prefer to continue in primary care, yet access higher levels when necessary. Urban respondents chose higher levels by default and seldom moved down to primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity, medical staff, transportation convenience, equipment and drug availability played important roles when choosing healthcare facilities in China. Strengthening primary care correspondingly may well be effective to increase primary care utilisation by the rural population but insufficient for the urban population. The developed four-stage process maps are general enough to serve as the basis for (partially) ordering factors influencing facility level choices in other contexts. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6150133/ /pubmed/30258653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000854 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Yun
Zhong, Liwei
Yuan, Shasha
van de Klundert, Joris
Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title_full Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title_fullStr Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title_full_unstemmed Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title_short Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China
title_sort why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: a qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000854
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyun whypatientspreferhighlevelhealthcarefacilitiesaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupsinruralandurbanchina
AT zhongliwei whypatientspreferhighlevelhealthcarefacilitiesaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupsinruralandurbanchina
AT yuanshasha whypatientspreferhighlevelhealthcarefacilitiesaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupsinruralandurbanchina
AT vandeklundertjoris whypatientspreferhighlevelhealthcarefacilitiesaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupsinruralandurbanchina