Cargando…

Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study

INTRODUCTION: This study protocol describes a trial designed to investigate whether high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen (HFHO) therapy in patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF) reduces the need of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricard, Jean-Damien, Dib, Fadia, Esposito-Farese, Marina, Messika, Jonathan, Girault, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022983
_version_ 1783356930578710528
author Ricard, Jean-Damien
Dib, Fadia
Esposito-Farese, Marina
Messika, Jonathan
Girault, Christophe
author_facet Ricard, Jean-Damien
Dib, Fadia
Esposito-Farese, Marina
Messika, Jonathan
Girault, Christophe
author_sort Ricard, Jean-Damien
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study protocol describes a trial designed to investigate whether high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen (HFHO) therapy in patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF) reduces the need of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label, superiority, international, parallel-group, multicentre randomised controlled two-arm trial, with an internal feasibility pilot phase. 242 patients with hypercapnic ARF requiring NIV admitted to an intensive care unit, an intermediate care or a respiratory care unit will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive HFHO or standard oxygen in between NIV sessions. Randomisation will be centralised and stratified by centre and pH at admission (pH ≤7.25 or >7.25). The primary outcome will be the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) and alive at day 28 postrandomisation. The secondary outcomes will encompass parameters related to the VFDs, comfort and tolerance variables, hospital length of stay and mortality. VFDs at 28 days postrandomisation will be compared between the two groups by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test in the intention-to-treat population. A sensitivity analysis will be conducted in the population of patients for whom the criteria of switching from NIV to spontaneous breathing, or conversely, are not strictly verified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Sud-Ouest & Outre-Mer IV (ref CPP17-049a/2017-A01830-53) and will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. A trial steering committee will oversee the progress of the study. Findings will be disseminated through national and international scientific conferences, and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03406572.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61501422018-09-26 Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study Ricard, Jean-Damien Dib, Fadia Esposito-Farese, Marina Messika, Jonathan Girault, Christophe BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: This study protocol describes a trial designed to investigate whether high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen (HFHO) therapy in patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF) reduces the need of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label, superiority, international, parallel-group, multicentre randomised controlled two-arm trial, with an internal feasibility pilot phase. 242 patients with hypercapnic ARF requiring NIV admitted to an intensive care unit, an intermediate care or a respiratory care unit will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive HFHO or standard oxygen in between NIV sessions. Randomisation will be centralised and stratified by centre and pH at admission (pH ≤7.25 or >7.25). The primary outcome will be the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) and alive at day 28 postrandomisation. The secondary outcomes will encompass parameters related to the VFDs, comfort and tolerance variables, hospital length of stay and mortality. VFDs at 28 days postrandomisation will be compared between the two groups by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test in the intention-to-treat population. A sensitivity analysis will be conducted in the population of patients for whom the criteria of switching from NIV to spontaneous breathing, or conversely, are not strictly verified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Sud-Ouest & Outre-Mer IV (ref CPP17-049a/2017-A01830-53) and will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. A trial steering committee will oversee the progress of the study. Findings will be disseminated through national and international scientific conferences, and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03406572. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6150142/ /pubmed/30232113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022983 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Ricard, Jean-Damien
Dib, Fadia
Esposito-Farese, Marina
Messika, Jonathan
Girault, Christophe
Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title_full Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title_fullStr Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title_short Comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. The ‘HIGH-FLOW ACRF’ study
title_sort comparison of high flow nasal cannula oxygen and conventional oxygen therapy on ventilatory support duration during acute-on-chronic respiratory failure: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. the ‘high-flow acrf’ study
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022983
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardjeandamien comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy
AT dibfadia comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy
AT espositofaresemarina comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy
AT messikajonathan comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy
AT giraultchristophe comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy
AT comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandconventionaloxygentherapyonventilatorysupportdurationduringacuteonchronicrespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialthehighflowacrfstudy