Cargando…

Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Despite the widespread existence of guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting, there is scarce information whether they are followed. We aimed to evaluate the adherence to guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting as well as their determinants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman, Marques-Vidal, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30240436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204000
_version_ 1783356994424406016
author Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
Marques-Vidal, Pedro
author_facet Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
Marques-Vidal, Pedro
author_sort Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
collection PubMed
description AIMS OF THE STUDY: Despite the widespread existence of guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting, there is scarce information whether they are followed. We aimed to evaluate the adherence to guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting as well as their determinants in a university hospital. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of discharged patients with data on Nutritional Risk Screening score (NRS-2002) from the department of internal medicine of the Lausanne University Hospital for years 2013–14. Adherence to the hospital monitoring guidelines, i.e.: 1) discharged patients with NRS-2002 score≥3 should have prealbumin levels measured, and 2) discharged patients with prealbumin levels<0.20 g/l should be rechecked 7 days afterwards, was assessed. Reporting of nutritionally ‘at-risk’ status in the discharge letter was also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine potential determinants of adherence to guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2,539 discharged patients with NRS-2002 data, 1,605 (63.0%) were nutritionally ‘at-risk’. Complete adherence to the monitoring guideline was observed in 238 (14.8%) of ‘at-risk’ patients. After multivariable analysis, adherence to the first step of monitoring guideline was associated with older age (≥ 80 years) [OR (95% CI): 2.03 (1.29–3.18)], high comorbidity index [1.36 (1.05–1.77)], and nutritional management [5.57 (4.38–7.07)]. Nutritional management was also associated with adherence to the second step of monitoring [3.98 (2.33–6.78)]. Adherence to the reporting guideline was observed in 343 (21.4%) of ‘at-risk’ patients. Multivariable analysis showed that adherence to the reporting guideline was associated with NRS-2002 score>4 [1.97 (1.47–2.64)], nutritional management [3.80 (2.85–5.07)], and adherence to the monitoring guideline [3.33 (2.35–4.71)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a poor adherence to guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting, possibly due to lack of training, staff, and time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61504732018-10-08 Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman Marques-Vidal, Pedro PLoS One Research Article AIMS OF THE STUDY: Despite the widespread existence of guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting, there is scarce information whether they are followed. We aimed to evaluate the adherence to guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting as well as their determinants in a university hospital. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of discharged patients with data on Nutritional Risk Screening score (NRS-2002) from the department of internal medicine of the Lausanne University Hospital for years 2013–14. Adherence to the hospital monitoring guidelines, i.e.: 1) discharged patients with NRS-2002 score≥3 should have prealbumin levels measured, and 2) discharged patients with prealbumin levels<0.20 g/l should be rechecked 7 days afterwards, was assessed. Reporting of nutritionally ‘at-risk’ status in the discharge letter was also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine potential determinants of adherence to guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2,539 discharged patients with NRS-2002 data, 1,605 (63.0%) were nutritionally ‘at-risk’. Complete adherence to the monitoring guideline was observed in 238 (14.8%) of ‘at-risk’ patients. After multivariable analysis, adherence to the first step of monitoring guideline was associated with older age (≥ 80 years) [OR (95% CI): 2.03 (1.29–3.18)], high comorbidity index [1.36 (1.05–1.77)], and nutritional management [5.57 (4.38–7.07)]. Nutritional management was also associated with adherence to the second step of monitoring [3.98 (2.33–6.78)]. Adherence to the reporting guideline was observed in 343 (21.4%) of ‘at-risk’ patients. Multivariable analysis showed that adherence to the reporting guideline was associated with NRS-2002 score>4 [1.97 (1.47–2.64)], nutritional management [3.80 (2.85–5.07)], and adherence to the monitoring guideline [3.33 (2.35–4.71)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a poor adherence to guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring and reporting, possibly due to lack of training, staff, and time. Public Library of Science 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6150473/ /pubmed/30240436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204000 Text en © 2018 Khalatbari-Soltani, Marques-Vidal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
Marques-Vidal, Pedro
Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title_full Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title_fullStr Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title_short Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
title_sort adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30240436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204000
work_keys_str_mv AT khalatbarisoltanisaman adherencetohospitalnutritionalstatusmonitoringandreportingguidelines
AT marquesvidalpedro adherencetohospitalnutritionalstatusmonitoringandreportingguidelines