Cargando…

The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Minimal access surgery has been promoted to reduce the surgical duration and complications of cochlear implant (CI) surgery. A requirement of minimal access surgery is adequate visualization of the surgical cavities. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a new light-in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alrashidi, Eman, Almuhawas, Fida Abdulaziz, Hagr, Abdulrahman, Garadat, Soha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377547
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.161
_version_ 1783357010796871680
author Alrashidi, Eman
Almuhawas, Fida Abdulaziz
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Garadat, Soha
author_facet Alrashidi, Eman
Almuhawas, Fida Abdulaziz
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Garadat, Soha
author_sort Alrashidi, Eman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimal access surgery has been promoted to reduce the surgical duration and complications of cochlear implant (CI) surgery. A requirement of minimal access surgery is adequate visualization of the surgical cavities. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a new light-integrated surgical retractor reduced CI surgical time. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Tertiary referral otolaryngology clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who received implants between January 2013 to May 2014 at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital before and after use of the illuminated retractor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Duration of surgery before and after the use of the illuminated retractor. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the surgical duration of CI relating to use of the illuminated retractor in 117 patients. The mean (SD) surgery duration in the unilateral cases was 132.7 (45.5) minutes before and 125.32 (42.76) minutes after use of the illuminated retractor (P=.479). For the bilateral cases, the mean (SD) surgical time was 213.6 (45.7) minutes before and 206.5 (45.5) minutes after use of the retractor (P=.702). There were no adverse events with use of the new tool. CONCLUSION: The similar duration and lack of adverse events suggest that the illuminated retractor is safe to use when drilling the bony recess for the receiver-stimulator package within the subperiosteal pocket. LIMITATIONS: The method used to calculate surgical duration may explain why no reduction in duration was shown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61505512018-09-25 The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study Alrashidi, Eman Almuhawas, Fida Abdulaziz Hagr, Abdulrahman Garadat, Soha Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Minimal access surgery has been promoted to reduce the surgical duration and complications of cochlear implant (CI) surgery. A requirement of minimal access surgery is adequate visualization of the surgical cavities. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a new light-integrated surgical retractor reduced CI surgical time. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Tertiary referral otolaryngology clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who received implants between January 2013 to May 2014 at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital before and after use of the illuminated retractor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Duration of surgery before and after the use of the illuminated retractor. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the surgical duration of CI relating to use of the illuminated retractor in 117 patients. The mean (SD) surgery duration in the unilateral cases was 132.7 (45.5) minutes before and 125.32 (42.76) minutes after use of the illuminated retractor (P=.479). For the bilateral cases, the mean (SD) surgical time was 213.6 (45.7) minutes before and 206.5 (45.5) minutes after use of the retractor (P=.702). There were no adverse events with use of the new tool. CONCLUSION: The similar duration and lack of adverse events suggest that the illuminated retractor is safe to use when drilling the bony recess for the receiver-stimulator package within the subperiosteal pocket. LIMITATIONS: The method used to calculate surgical duration may explain why no reduction in duration was shown. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6150551/ /pubmed/28377547 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.161 Text en © 2017 Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Alrashidi, Eman
Almuhawas, Fida Abdulaziz
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Garadat, Soha
The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title_full The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title_fullStr The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title_short The use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
title_sort use of an illuminated retractor in cochlear implantation: a comparative retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377547
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.161
work_keys_str_mv AT alrashidieman theuseofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT almuhawasfidaabdulaziz theuseofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT hagrabdulrahman theuseofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT garadatsoha theuseofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT alrashidieman useofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT almuhawasfidaabdulaziz useofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT hagrabdulrahman useofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy
AT garadatsoha useofanilluminatedretractorincochlearimplantationacomparativeretrospectivestudy