Cargando…

Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter

BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karaaslan, Pelin, Gokay, Banu Vural, Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet, Darcin, Kamil, Karakaya, Afak Durur, Ormeci, Tugrul, Kose, Emine Arzu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761030
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308
_version_ 1783357019098447872
author Karaaslan, Pelin
Gokay, Banu Vural
Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet
Darcin, Kamil
Karakaya, Afak Durur
Ormeci, Tugrul
Kose, Emine Arzu
author_facet Karaaslan, Pelin
Gokay, Banu Vural
Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet
Darcin, Kamil
Karakaya, Afak Durur
Ormeci, Tugrul
Kose, Emine Arzu
author_sort Karaaslan, Pelin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication rates. Common methods to enlarge the RIJV cross-sectional area are the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva maneuver. OBJECTIVE: Compare the Trendelenburg position with upper-extremity venous return blockage using the tourniquet technique. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I) aged 18–45 years were included in the study. The first measurement was made when the volunteers were in the supine position. The RIJV diameter and cross-sectional area were measured from the apex of the triangle formed by the clavicle and the two ends of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, which is used for the conventional approach. The second measurement was performed in a 20° Trendelenburg position. After the drainage of the veins using an Esbach bandage both arms were cuffed. The third measurement was made when tourniquets were inflated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hemodynamic measurements and RIJV dimensions. RESULTS: In 65 volunteers the diameter and cross-sectional area of the RIJV were significantly widened in both Trendelenburg and tourniquet measurements compared with the supine position (P<.001 for both measures). Measurements using the upper extremity tourniquet were significantly larger than Trendelenburg measurements (P=.002 and <.001 for cross-sectional area and diameter, respectively). CONCLUSION: Channelling of the upper-extremity venous return to the jugular vein was significantly superior when compared with the Trendelenburg position and the supine position. LIMITATIONS: No catheterization and study limited to healthy volunteers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61505872018-09-25 Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter Karaaslan, Pelin Gokay, Banu Vural Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet Darcin, Kamil Karakaya, Afak Durur Ormeci, Tugrul Kose, Emine Arzu Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication rates. Common methods to enlarge the RIJV cross-sectional area are the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva maneuver. OBJECTIVE: Compare the Trendelenburg position with upper-extremity venous return blockage using the tourniquet technique. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I) aged 18–45 years were included in the study. The first measurement was made when the volunteers were in the supine position. The RIJV diameter and cross-sectional area were measured from the apex of the triangle formed by the clavicle and the two ends of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, which is used for the conventional approach. The second measurement was performed in a 20° Trendelenburg position. After the drainage of the veins using an Esbach bandage both arms were cuffed. The third measurement was made when tourniquets were inflated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hemodynamic measurements and RIJV dimensions. RESULTS: In 65 volunteers the diameter and cross-sectional area of the RIJV were significantly widened in both Trendelenburg and tourniquet measurements compared with the supine position (P<.001 for both measures). Measurements using the upper extremity tourniquet were significantly larger than Trendelenburg measurements (P=.002 and <.001 for cross-sectional area and diameter, respectively). CONCLUSION: Channelling of the upper-extremity venous return to the jugular vein was significantly superior when compared with the Trendelenburg position and the supine position. LIMITATIONS: No catheterization and study limited to healthy volunteers. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6150587/ /pubmed/28761030 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308 Text en © 2017 Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Karaaslan, Pelin
Gokay, Banu Vural
Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet
Darcin, Kamil
Karakaya, Afak Durur
Ormeci, Tugrul
Kose, Emine Arzu
Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title_full Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title_fullStr Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title_short Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
title_sort comparison of the trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761030
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308
work_keys_str_mv AT karaaslanpelin comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT gokaybanuvural comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT karakayamuhammetahmet comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT darcinkamil comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT karakayaafakdurur comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT ormecitugrul comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter
AT koseeminearzu comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter