Cargando…
Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter
BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761030 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308 |
_version_ | 1783357019098447872 |
---|---|
author | Karaaslan, Pelin Gokay, Banu Vural Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet Darcin, Kamil Karakaya, Afak Durur Ormeci, Tugrul Kose, Emine Arzu |
author_facet | Karaaslan, Pelin Gokay, Banu Vural Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet Darcin, Kamil Karakaya, Afak Durur Ormeci, Tugrul Kose, Emine Arzu |
author_sort | Karaaslan, Pelin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication rates. Common methods to enlarge the RIJV cross-sectional area are the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva maneuver. OBJECTIVE: Compare the Trendelenburg position with upper-extremity venous return blockage using the tourniquet technique. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I) aged 18–45 years were included in the study. The first measurement was made when the volunteers were in the supine position. The RIJV diameter and cross-sectional area were measured from the apex of the triangle formed by the clavicle and the two ends of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, which is used for the conventional approach. The second measurement was performed in a 20° Trendelenburg position. After the drainage of the veins using an Esbach bandage both arms were cuffed. The third measurement was made when tourniquets were inflated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hemodynamic measurements and RIJV dimensions. RESULTS: In 65 volunteers the diameter and cross-sectional area of the RIJV were significantly widened in both Trendelenburg and tourniquet measurements compared with the supine position (P<.001 for both measures). Measurements using the upper extremity tourniquet were significantly larger than Trendelenburg measurements (P=.002 and <.001 for cross-sectional area and diameter, respectively). CONCLUSION: Channelling of the upper-extremity venous return to the jugular vein was significantly superior when compared with the Trendelenburg position and the supine position. LIMITATIONS: No catheterization and study limited to healthy volunteers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6150587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61505872018-09-25 Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter Karaaslan, Pelin Gokay, Banu Vural Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet Darcin, Kamil Karakaya, Afak Durur Ormeci, Tugrul Kose, Emine Arzu Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation is a necessary invasive procedure for fluid management, haemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive drug therapy. The right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred site. Enlargement of the jugular vein area facilitates catheterization and reduces complication rates. Common methods to enlarge the RIJV cross-sectional area are the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva maneuver. OBJECTIVE: Compare the Trendelenburg position with upper-extremity venous return blockage using the tourniquet technique. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I) aged 18–45 years were included in the study. The first measurement was made when the volunteers were in the supine position. The RIJV diameter and cross-sectional area were measured from the apex of the triangle formed by the clavicle and the two ends of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, which is used for the conventional approach. The second measurement was performed in a 20° Trendelenburg position. After the drainage of the veins using an Esbach bandage both arms were cuffed. The third measurement was made when tourniquets were inflated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hemodynamic measurements and RIJV dimensions. RESULTS: In 65 volunteers the diameter and cross-sectional area of the RIJV were significantly widened in both Trendelenburg and tourniquet measurements compared with the supine position (P<.001 for both measures). Measurements using the upper extremity tourniquet were significantly larger than Trendelenburg measurements (P=.002 and <.001 for cross-sectional area and diameter, respectively). CONCLUSION: Channelling of the upper-extremity venous return to the jugular vein was significantly superior when compared with the Trendelenburg position and the supine position. LIMITATIONS: No catheterization and study limited to healthy volunteers. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6150587/ /pubmed/28761030 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308 Text en © 2017 Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karaaslan, Pelin Gokay, Banu Vural Karakaya, Muhammet Ahmet Darcin, Kamil Karakaya, Afak Durur Ormeci, Tugrul Kose, Emine Arzu Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title | Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title_full | Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title_short | Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
title_sort | comparison of the trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761030 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karaaslanpelin comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT gokaybanuvural comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT karakayamuhammetahmet comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT darcinkamil comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT karakayaafakdurur comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT ormecitugrul comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter AT koseeminearzu comparisonofthetrendelenburgpositionversusupperlimbtourniquetoninternaljugularveindiameter |