Cargando…
Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
[Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361 |
_version_ | 1783357035004297216 |
---|---|
author | Lam, Wan Yee van Zelm, Rosalie Benítez-López, Ana Kulak, Michal Sim, Sarah King, J. M. Henry Huijbregts, Mark A. J. |
author_facet | Lam, Wan Yee van Zelm, Rosalie Benítez-López, Ana Kulak, Michal Sim, Sarah King, J. M. Henry Huijbregts, Mark A. J. |
author_sort | Lam, Wan Yee |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under Unilever’s sustainable agricultural code. It represents on average 3% of the annual global production of processing tomatoes: insights can be used to help inform corporate sourcing strategies and certification schemes. The median GHG footprint ranged from 18 in Chile to 61 kg CO(2)-equiv per tonne of tomatoes in India, lower than results reported in other studies. We found that footprints are more consistent within countries than between them. Using linear mixed effect models, we quantified the relative influence of environmental conditions and farm management factors. Key variables were area of production and the method of fertilizer application. GHG footprints decreased with increasing area of production to a threshold of 17.4 ha. Farms using single fertilizer application methods in general had a larger GHG footprint than those using a combination of methods. We conclude that farm management factors should be prioritized for future data collection, and more stringent guidance on acceptable practices is required if greater comparability of outcomes is needed either within a scheme, such as the Unilever’s sustainable agriculture code, or between schemes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6150678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61506782018-09-24 Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment Lam, Wan Yee van Zelm, Rosalie Benítez-López, Ana Kulak, Michal Sim, Sarah King, J. M. Henry Huijbregts, Mark A. J. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under Unilever’s sustainable agricultural code. It represents on average 3% of the annual global production of processing tomatoes: insights can be used to help inform corporate sourcing strategies and certification schemes. The median GHG footprint ranged from 18 in Chile to 61 kg CO(2)-equiv per tonne of tomatoes in India, lower than results reported in other studies. We found that footprints are more consistent within countries than between them. Using linear mixed effect models, we quantified the relative influence of environmental conditions and farm management factors. Key variables were area of production and the method of fertilizer application. GHG footprints decreased with increasing area of production to a threshold of 17.4 ha. Farms using single fertilizer application methods in general had a larger GHG footprint than those using a combination of methods. We conclude that farm management factors should be prioritized for future data collection, and more stringent guidance on acceptable practices is required if greater comparability of outcomes is needed either within a scheme, such as the Unilever’s sustainable agriculture code, or between schemes. American Chemical Society 2017-12-01 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6150678/ /pubmed/29195039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Lam, Wan Yee van Zelm, Rosalie Benítez-López, Ana Kulak, Michal Sim, Sarah King, J. M. Henry Huijbregts, Mark A. J. Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title | Variability
of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field
Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title_full | Variability
of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field
Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title_fullStr | Variability
of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field
Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability
of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field
Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title_short | Variability
of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field
Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment |
title_sort | variability
of greenhouse gas footprints of field
tomatoes grown for processing: interyear and intercountry assessment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamwanyee variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT vanzelmrosalie variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT benitezlopezana variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT kulakmichal variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT simsarah variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT kingjmhenry variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment AT huijbregtsmarkaj variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment |