Cargando…

Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment

[Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Wan Yee, van Zelm, Rosalie, Benítez-López, Ana, Kulak, Michal, Sim, Sarah, King, J. M. Henry, Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361
_version_ 1783357035004297216
author Lam, Wan Yee
van Zelm, Rosalie
Benítez-López, Ana
Kulak, Michal
Sim, Sarah
King, J. M. Henry
Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
author_facet Lam, Wan Yee
van Zelm, Rosalie
Benítez-López, Ana
Kulak, Michal
Sim, Sarah
King, J. M. Henry
Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
author_sort Lam, Wan Yee
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under Unilever’s sustainable agricultural code. It represents on average 3% of the annual global production of processing tomatoes: insights can be used to help inform corporate sourcing strategies and certification schemes. The median GHG footprint ranged from 18 in Chile to 61 kg CO(2)-equiv per tonne of tomatoes in India, lower than results reported in other studies. We found that footprints are more consistent within countries than between them. Using linear mixed effect models, we quantified the relative influence of environmental conditions and farm management factors. Key variables were area of production and the method of fertilizer application. GHG footprints decreased with increasing area of production to a threshold of 17.4 ha. Farms using single fertilizer application methods in general had a larger GHG footprint than those using a combination of methods. We conclude that farm management factors should be prioritized for future data collection, and more stringent guidance on acceptable practices is required if greater comparability of outcomes is needed either within a scheme, such as the Unilever’s sustainable agriculture code, or between schemes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61506782018-09-24 Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment Lam, Wan Yee van Zelm, Rosalie Benítez-López, Ana Kulak, Michal Sim, Sarah King, J. M. Henry Huijbregts, Mark A. J. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Our study provides an integrated analysis of the variability of greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of field-grown tomatoes for processing. The global farm-specific data set of 890 observations across 14 countries over a three-year period (2013–2015) was obtained from farms grown under Unilever’s sustainable agricultural code. It represents on average 3% of the annual global production of processing tomatoes: insights can be used to help inform corporate sourcing strategies and certification schemes. The median GHG footprint ranged from 18 in Chile to 61 kg CO(2)-equiv per tonne of tomatoes in India, lower than results reported in other studies. We found that footprints are more consistent within countries than between them. Using linear mixed effect models, we quantified the relative influence of environmental conditions and farm management factors. Key variables were area of production and the method of fertilizer application. GHG footprints decreased with increasing area of production to a threshold of 17.4 ha. Farms using single fertilizer application methods in general had a larger GHG footprint than those using a combination of methods. We conclude that farm management factors should be prioritized for future data collection, and more stringent guidance on acceptable practices is required if greater comparability of outcomes is needed either within a scheme, such as the Unilever’s sustainable agriculture code, or between schemes. American Chemical Society 2017-12-01 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6150678/ /pubmed/29195039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Lam, Wan Yee
van Zelm, Rosalie
Benítez-López, Ana
Kulak, Michal
Sim, Sarah
King, J. M. Henry
Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title_full Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title_fullStr Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title_short Variability of Greenhouse Gas Footprints of Field Tomatoes Grown for Processing: Interyear and Intercountry Assessment
title_sort variability of greenhouse gas footprints of field tomatoes grown for processing: interyear and intercountry assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04361
work_keys_str_mv AT lamwanyee variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT vanzelmrosalie variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT benitezlopezana variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT kulakmichal variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT simsarah variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT kingjmhenry variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment
AT huijbregtsmarkaj variabilityofgreenhousegasfootprintsoffieldtomatoesgrownforprocessinginteryearandintercountryassessment