Cargando…

Primary Rectal Cancer: Repeatability of Global and Local-Regional MR Imaging Texture Features

PURPOSE: To assess the day-to-day repeatability of global and local-regional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging texture features derived from primary rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical approval and patient informed consent were obtained, two pretreatment T2-weighted axial MR imaging st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gourtsoyianni, Sofia, Doumou, Georgia, Prezzi, Davide, Taylor, Benjamin, Stirling, J. James, Taylor, N. Jane, Siddique, Musib, Cook, Gary J. R., Glynne-Jones, Robert, Goh, Vicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radiological Society of North America 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28481194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161375
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To assess the day-to-day repeatability of global and local-regional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging texture features derived from primary rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical approval and patient informed consent were obtained, two pretreatment T2-weighted axial MR imaging studies performed prospectively with the same imaging unit on 2 consecutive days in 14 patients with rectal cancer (11 men [mean age, 61.7 years], three women [mean age, 70.0 years]) were analyzed to extract (a) global first-order statistical histogram and model-based fractal features reflecting the whole-tumor voxel intensity histogram distribution and repeating patterns, respectively, without spatial information and (b) local-regional second-order and high-order statistical texture features reflecting the intensity and spatial interrelationships between adjacent in-plane or multiplanar voxels or regions, respectively. Repeatability was assessed for 46 texture features, and mean difference, 95% limits of agreement, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), and repeatability coefficient (r) were recorded. RESULTS: Repeatability was better for global parameters than for most local-regional parameters. In particular, histogram mean, median, and entropy, fractal dimension mean and standard deviation, and second-order entropy, homogeneity, difference entropy, and inverse difference moment demonstrated good repeatability, with narrow limits of agreement and wCVs of 10% or lower. Repeatability was poorest for the following high-order gray-level run-length (GLRL) gray-level zone size matrix (GLZSM) and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix (NGTDM) parameters: GLRL intensity variability, GLZSM short-zone emphasis, GLZSM intensity nonuniformity, GLZSM intensity variability, GLZSM size zone variability, and NGTDM complexity, demonstrating wider agreement limits and wCVs of 50% or greater. CONCLUSION: MR imaging repeatability is better for global texture parameters than for local-regional texture parameters, indicating that global texture parameters should be sufficiently robust for clinical practice. Online supplemental material is available for this article.