Cargando…

Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study

BACKGROUND: Although oversedation has been associated with increased morbidity in ventilated critically ill patients, it is unclear whether prevention of oversedation improves mortality. We aimed to assess 90-day mortality in patients receiving a bundle of interventions to prevent oversedation as co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0425-3
_version_ 1783357057721696256
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although oversedation has been associated with increased morbidity in ventilated critically ill patients, it is unclear whether prevention of oversedation improves mortality. We aimed to assess 90-day mortality in patients receiving a bundle of interventions to prevent oversedation as compared to usual care. METHODS: In this randomized multicentre trial, all adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h were included. Two groups were compared: patients managed according to usual sedation practices (control), and patients receiving sedation according to an algorithm which provided a gradual multilevel response to pain, agitation, and ventilator dyssynchrony with no specific target to alter consciousness and no use of sedation scale and promoted the use of alternatives to continuous infusion of midazolam or propofol (intervention). RESULTS: Inclusions were stopped before reaching the planned enrolment. Between 2012 and 2014, 584 patients were included in the intervention group and 590 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Although the use of midazolam and propofol was significantly lower in the intervention group, 90-day mortality was not significantly lower (39.4 vs. 44.2% in the control group, p = 0.09). There were no significant differences in 1-year mortality between the two groups. The time to first spontaneous breathing trial and time to successful extubation were significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group. These last results should be interpreted with precaution regarding the several limitations of the trial including the early termination. CONCLUSIONS: This underpowered study of severely ill patients was unable to show that a strategy to prevent oversedation could significantly reduce mortality. Trial registration NCT01617265 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0425-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61508622018-10-09 Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Although oversedation has been associated with increased morbidity in ventilated critically ill patients, it is unclear whether prevention of oversedation improves mortality. We aimed to assess 90-day mortality in patients receiving a bundle of interventions to prevent oversedation as compared to usual care. METHODS: In this randomized multicentre trial, all adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h were included. Two groups were compared: patients managed according to usual sedation practices (control), and patients receiving sedation according to an algorithm which provided a gradual multilevel response to pain, agitation, and ventilator dyssynchrony with no specific target to alter consciousness and no use of sedation scale and promoted the use of alternatives to continuous infusion of midazolam or propofol (intervention). RESULTS: Inclusions were stopped before reaching the planned enrolment. Between 2012 and 2014, 584 patients were included in the intervention group and 590 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Although the use of midazolam and propofol was significantly lower in the intervention group, 90-day mortality was not significantly lower (39.4 vs. 44.2% in the control group, p = 0.09). There were no significant differences in 1-year mortality between the two groups. The time to first spontaneous breathing trial and time to successful extubation were significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group. These last results should be interpreted with precaution regarding the several limitations of the trial including the early termination. CONCLUSIONS: This underpowered study of severely ill patients was unable to show that a strategy to prevent oversedation could significantly reduce mortality. Trial registration NCT01617265 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0425-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6150862/ /pubmed/30242747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0425-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title_full Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title_fullStr Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title_short Impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the AWARE study
title_sort impact of oversedation prevention in ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial—the aware study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0425-3
work_keys_str_mv AT impactofoversedationpreventioninventilatedcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrialtheawarestudy