Cargando…

A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service

BACKGROUND: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is preparing a new set of regulations that will cover working and resting periods for crew members engaged in emergency medical services with helicopters (HEMS) and aeroplanes (AEMS). Such a shared European regulatory framework has already been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim, Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, Dahle, Anders Nordgaard, Asche, Frank, Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0548-4
_version_ 1783357081717309440
author Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
Selvik, Jon Tømmerås
Dahle, Anders Nordgaard
Asche, Frank
Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim
author_facet Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
Selvik, Jon Tømmerås
Dahle, Anders Nordgaard
Asche, Frank
Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim
author_sort Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is preparing a new set of regulations that will cover working and resting periods for crew members engaged in emergency medical services with helicopters (HEMS) and aeroplanes (AEMS). Such a shared European regulatory framework has already been introduced for the majority of commercial operations with aeroplanes, whereas national regulations are still in place for helicopter operations. A possible consequence of changing the regulations on working and resting periods for helicopter operations is that current abilities to provide 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same helicopter crew will be changed to a daily shift pattern with two, and even up to three, different crews to cover one 24-h period. METHODS: A cost-benefit study is used to analyse whether changed working and resting periods, through the introduction of a shared European framework are socio-economically profitable for Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). For the study, relevant data is available for the total of nine HEMS helicopters of the three regions in Norway, for the period 2006–2013. The aim of the study is to document whether changed working and resting periods will be socio-economically beneficial for the Norwegian HEMS. RESULTS: The expected present value of changing the current regulations on working and resting periods is estimated at negative 181 million NOK over a 40-year period. This includes the assumption that all missions that are not completed today due to limitation in crew availability will be completed upon introducing new working and resting periods. In the current regulatory regime for the Norwegian HEMS, there are on average seven missions per HEMS base annually that are not completed due to the limitations in crew availability with the current working and resting periods. Changing the regulations on working and resting periods is estimated to be cost-effective when a minimum of 14 missions per year are prevented from being cancelled due to crew availability. DISCUSSION: The benefit and cost elements used in the socio-economic analysis contain an estimated benefit of the measure, based on the valuation of life years gained for a limited number of patients. The prerequisites for life years gained, with the associated monetary value for quality-adjusted life years, are important for the outcome of the cost-benefit analysis. In this study 6.95 life years gained is used as basis for the benefit of the measure. This number is based on the conclusion of two studies, which have studied the benefits of HEMS helicopters staffed with a doctor in Norway. In a cost-benefit analyses, a quantification shall as far as possible be made in monetary values of all the positive and negative effects the measure entails. In this analysis, one criticism may be that these effects are relatively few, the investment costs (the increased operating costs) are not provided a detailed description of, and other factors such as; effect on the environment, risk of simultaneous requirements of the HEMS helicopter with possible negative effect for the patient who most needs it, likelihood of accidents with associated negative effect are neither included in the cost-benefit analysis. CONCLUSION: Alternations to the working and resting periods for Norwegian HEMS operations that will result in a change from the current 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same crew, to a set-up with two, and up to three, different crews are not found to be socio-economically beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61509972018-09-26 A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim Selvik, Jon Tømmerås Dahle, Anders Nordgaard Asche, Frank Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is preparing a new set of regulations that will cover working and resting periods for crew members engaged in emergency medical services with helicopters (HEMS) and aeroplanes (AEMS). Such a shared European regulatory framework has already been introduced for the majority of commercial operations with aeroplanes, whereas national regulations are still in place for helicopter operations. A possible consequence of changing the regulations on working and resting periods for helicopter operations is that current abilities to provide 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same helicopter crew will be changed to a daily shift pattern with two, and even up to three, different crews to cover one 24-h period. METHODS: A cost-benefit study is used to analyse whether changed working and resting periods, through the introduction of a shared European framework are socio-economically profitable for Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). For the study, relevant data is available for the total of nine HEMS helicopters of the three regions in Norway, for the period 2006–2013. The aim of the study is to document whether changed working and resting periods will be socio-economically beneficial for the Norwegian HEMS. RESULTS: The expected present value of changing the current regulations on working and resting periods is estimated at negative 181 million NOK over a 40-year period. This includes the assumption that all missions that are not completed today due to limitation in crew availability will be completed upon introducing new working and resting periods. In the current regulatory regime for the Norwegian HEMS, there are on average seven missions per HEMS base annually that are not completed due to the limitations in crew availability with the current working and resting periods. Changing the regulations on working and resting periods is estimated to be cost-effective when a minimum of 14 missions per year are prevented from being cancelled due to crew availability. DISCUSSION: The benefit and cost elements used in the socio-economic analysis contain an estimated benefit of the measure, based on the valuation of life years gained for a limited number of patients. The prerequisites for life years gained, with the associated monetary value for quality-adjusted life years, are important for the outcome of the cost-benefit analysis. In this study 6.95 life years gained is used as basis for the benefit of the measure. This number is based on the conclusion of two studies, which have studied the benefits of HEMS helicopters staffed with a doctor in Norway. In a cost-benefit analyses, a quantification shall as far as possible be made in monetary values of all the positive and negative effects the measure entails. In this analysis, one criticism may be that these effects are relatively few, the investment costs (the increased operating costs) are not provided a detailed description of, and other factors such as; effect on the environment, risk of simultaneous requirements of the HEMS helicopter with possible negative effect for the patient who most needs it, likelihood of accidents with associated negative effect are neither included in the cost-benefit analysis. CONCLUSION: Alternations to the working and resting periods for Norwegian HEMS operations that will result in a change from the current 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same crew, to a set-up with two, and up to three, different crews are not found to be socio-economically beneficial. BioMed Central 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6150997/ /pubmed/30241544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0548-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
Selvik, Jon Tømmerås
Dahle, Anders Nordgaard
Asche, Frank
Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim
A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title_full A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title_fullStr A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title_full_unstemmed A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title_short A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
title_sort socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the norwegian helicopter emergency medical service
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0548-4
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamseneirikbjorheim asocioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT selvikjontømmeras asocioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT dahleandersnordgaard asocioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT aschefrank asocioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT abrahamsenhakonbjorheim asocioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT abrahamseneirikbjorheim socioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT selvikjontømmeras socioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT dahleandersnordgaard socioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT aschefrank socioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice
AT abrahamsenhakonbjorheim socioeconomicanalysisofincreasedstaffinginthenorwegianhelicopteremergencymedicalservice