Cargando…

Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load

BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. METHODS: This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a crossover d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swinton, Paul, Corfield, Alasdair R., Moultrie, Chris, Percival, David, Proctor, Jeffrey, Sinclair, Neil, Perkins, Zane B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3
_version_ 1783357081942753280
author Swinton, Paul
Corfield, Alasdair R.
Moultrie, Chris
Percival, David
Proctor, Jeffrey
Sinclair, Neil
Perkins, Zane B.
author_facet Swinton, Paul
Corfield, Alasdair R.
Moultrie, Chris
Percival, David
Proctor, Jeffrey
Sinclair, Neil
Perkins, Zane B.
author_sort Swinton, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. METHODS: This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a crossover design. Clinical teams (physician and paramedic) from the Emergency Medical Retrieval Service and the Scottish Air Ambulance Division were randomised to perform a standardised pre-hospital clinical simulation using either unprepared (standard practice) or pre-prepared (experimental method) PHEA equipment and drugs. Following a two-week washout period, each team performed the corresponding simulation. The primary outcome was intervention time. Secondary outcomes were safety-related incidents and errors, and degree of cognitive load. RESULTS: In total 23 experiments were completed, 12 using experimental method and 11 using standard practice. Time required to perform PHEA using the experimental method was significantly shorter than with standard practice (11,45 versus 20:59) minutes: seconds; p = < 0.001). The experimental method also significantly reduced procedural errors (0 versus 9, p = 0.007) and the cognitive load experienced by the intubator assistant (41.9 versus 68.7 mm, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-preparation of PHEA equipment and drugs resulted in safer performance of PHEA and has the potential to reduce on-scene time by up to a third. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61509982018-09-26 Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load Swinton, Paul Corfield, Alasdair R. Moultrie, Chris Percival, David Proctor, Jeffrey Sinclair, Neil Perkins, Zane B. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. METHODS: This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a crossover design. Clinical teams (physician and paramedic) from the Emergency Medical Retrieval Service and the Scottish Air Ambulance Division were randomised to perform a standardised pre-hospital clinical simulation using either unprepared (standard practice) or pre-prepared (experimental method) PHEA equipment and drugs. Following a two-week washout period, each team performed the corresponding simulation. The primary outcome was intervention time. Secondary outcomes were safety-related incidents and errors, and degree of cognitive load. RESULTS: In total 23 experiments were completed, 12 using experimental method and 11 using standard practice. Time required to perform PHEA using the experimental method was significantly shorter than with standard practice (11,45 versus 20:59) minutes: seconds; p = < 0.001). The experimental method also significantly reduced procedural errors (0 versus 9, p = 0.007) and the cognitive load experienced by the intubator assistant (41.9 versus 68.7 mm, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-preparation of PHEA equipment and drugs resulted in safer performance of PHEA and has the potential to reduce on-scene time by up to a third. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6150998/ /pubmed/30241559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Swinton, Paul
Corfield, Alasdair R.
Moultrie, Chris
Percival, David
Proctor, Jeffrey
Sinclair, Neil
Perkins, Zane B.
Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_full Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_fullStr Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_full_unstemmed Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_short Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_sort impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (phea) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3
work_keys_str_mv AT swintonpaul impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT corfieldalasdairr impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT moultriechris impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT percivaldavid impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT proctorjeffrey impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT sinclairneil impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT perkinszaneb impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload