Cargando…

Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers

BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome (DS) has become widely available. In Hong Kong, obstetric providers in the public sector refer women identified at high risk of having a child with Down syndrome to obstetric providers in the priv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung, Yi, Huso, Ahmed, Shenaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3540-9
_version_ 1783357082169245696
author Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
Yi, Huso
Ahmed, Shenaz
author_facet Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
Yi, Huso
Ahmed, Shenaz
author_sort Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome (DS) has become widely available. In Hong Kong, obstetric providers in the public sector refer women identified at high risk of having a child with Down syndrome to obstetric providers in the private sector for NIPT. Little is known about how the NIPT has been adopted in the public sector where DS screening is provided for free of charge. The study aimed to identify the factors influencing providers’ role enactment, such as consultation and referral, in the service provision of NIPT for DS in public and private healthcare sectors. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 obstetric providers offering NIPT in Hong Kong. Thematic narrative analysis was used to identify (i) the factors considered by participants when referring women for NIPT for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors and (ii) their perceptions of the need to integrate NIPT into the current public antenatal service. RESULTS: Participants raised concerns about the lack of transparent referral guideline between public and private sectors for NIPT. Public obstetric providers reported little obligation to provide women with much information about risks and benefits of NIPT as it was not provided by public sectors. Some private providers assumed that women referred from the public sector had already received sufficient information about NIPT. The providers were also concerned about potential application of NIPT for further detection without regulation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the providers had good knowledge of clinical advantages of NIPT over conventional screening, they were uncertain about how to introduce NIPT to women. Guidelines are necessary to enable better coordination of public and private sectors services to enable women to make informed choices about the uptake of NIPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6150999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61509992018-09-26 Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung Yi, Huso Ahmed, Shenaz BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome (DS) has become widely available. In Hong Kong, obstetric providers in the public sector refer women identified at high risk of having a child with Down syndrome to obstetric providers in the private sector for NIPT. Little is known about how the NIPT has been adopted in the public sector where DS screening is provided for free of charge. The study aimed to identify the factors influencing providers’ role enactment, such as consultation and referral, in the service provision of NIPT for DS in public and private healthcare sectors. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 obstetric providers offering NIPT in Hong Kong. Thematic narrative analysis was used to identify (i) the factors considered by participants when referring women for NIPT for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors and (ii) their perceptions of the need to integrate NIPT into the current public antenatal service. RESULTS: Participants raised concerns about the lack of transparent referral guideline between public and private sectors for NIPT. Public obstetric providers reported little obligation to provide women with much information about risks and benefits of NIPT as it was not provided by public sectors. Some private providers assumed that women referred from the public sector had already received sufficient information about NIPT. The providers were also concerned about potential application of NIPT for further detection without regulation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the providers had good knowledge of clinical advantages of NIPT over conventional screening, they were uncertain about how to introduce NIPT to women. Guidelines are necessary to enable better coordination of public and private sectors services to enable women to make informed choices about the uptake of NIPT. BioMed Central 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6150999/ /pubmed/30241520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3540-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
Yi, Huso
Ahmed, Shenaz
Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title_full Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title_fullStr Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title_full_unstemmed Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title_short Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
title_sort service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6150999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3540-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nganoliviamiuyung serviceprovisionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinpublicandprivatehealthcaresectorsaqualitativestudywithobstetricproviders
AT yihuso serviceprovisionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinpublicandprivatehealthcaresectorsaqualitativestudywithobstetricproviders
AT ahmedshenaz serviceprovisionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinpublicandprivatehealthcaresectorsaqualitativestudywithobstetricproviders