Cargando…
The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of car...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4 |
_version_ | 1783357086261837824 |
---|---|
author | So, Ralph K. L. Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Subbe, Chris P. Jones, Daryl A. van Rosmalen, Joost Lighthall, Geoffrey K. |
author_facet | So, Ralph K. L. Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Subbe, Chris P. Jones, Daryl A. van Rosmalen, Joost Lighthall, Geoffrey K. |
author_sort | So, Ralph K. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of care. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency and association of frailty with clinical outcomes in patients subject to rapid response team (RRT) review. METHODS: In this multi-national prospective observational cohort study, centres with existing RRTs collected data over a 7-day period, with follow up of all patients at 24 h following their RRT call and at hospital discharge or 30 days following the event trigger (whichever came sooner). Investigators also collected data on the triggers and interventions provided and a bedside assessment on the level of patients’ frailty using a clinical frailty scale. RESULTS: Amongst 1133 patients, 40% were screened as frail, which was associated with older age (p < 0.001), admission under a medical speciality (p < 0.001), increased severity of illness at the time of the RRT review (p = 0.0047), and substantially higher frequency of limitations of care (p < 0.001). Importantly, 72% of patients screened as frail were either dead or dependent on hospital care by 30 days (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the significant risk factors for the composite endpoint “poor recovery” (died or were hospital-dependent by 30 days) were age (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001), frailty level (p < 0.001), existing limitation of care (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–3.0; p < 0.001), and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher frailty scores were associated with increased mortality and dependence on health care at 30 days. Our results indicate that frailty has an influence on the clinical trajectory of deteriorating patients and that such assessment should be included in discussion of goals and expectations of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR5535. Registered on 23 December 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6151016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61510162018-09-26 The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study So, Ralph K. L. Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Subbe, Chris P. Jones, Daryl A. van Rosmalen, Joost Lighthall, Geoffrey K. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of care. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency and association of frailty with clinical outcomes in patients subject to rapid response team (RRT) review. METHODS: In this multi-national prospective observational cohort study, centres with existing RRTs collected data over a 7-day period, with follow up of all patients at 24 h following their RRT call and at hospital discharge or 30 days following the event trigger (whichever came sooner). Investigators also collected data on the triggers and interventions provided and a bedside assessment on the level of patients’ frailty using a clinical frailty scale. RESULTS: Amongst 1133 patients, 40% were screened as frail, which was associated with older age (p < 0.001), admission under a medical speciality (p < 0.001), increased severity of illness at the time of the RRT review (p = 0.0047), and substantially higher frequency of limitations of care (p < 0.001). Importantly, 72% of patients screened as frail were either dead or dependent on hospital care by 30 days (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the significant risk factors for the composite endpoint “poor recovery” (died or were hospital-dependent by 30 days) were age (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001), frailty level (p < 0.001), existing limitation of care (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–3.0; p < 0.001), and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher frailty scores were associated with increased mortality and dependence on health care at 30 days. Our results indicate that frailty has an influence on the clinical trajectory of deteriorating patients and that such assessment should be included in discussion of goals and expectations of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR5535. Registered on 23 December 2015. BioMed Central 2018-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6151016/ /pubmed/30241490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research So, Ralph K. L. Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Subbe, Chris P. Jones, Daryl A. van Rosmalen, Joost Lighthall, Geoffrey K. The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title | The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title_full | The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title_short | The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
title_sort | association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soralphkl theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT bannardsmithjonathan theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT subbechrisp theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT jonesdaryla theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT vanrosmalenjoost theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT lighthallgeoffreyk theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT soralphkl associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT bannardsmithjonathan associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT subbechrisp associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT jonesdaryla associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT vanrosmalenjoost associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT lighthallgeoffreyk associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy |