Cargando…

The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: So, Ralph K. L., Bannard-Smith, Jonathan, Subbe, Chris P., Jones, Daryl A., van Rosmalen, Joost, Lighthall, Geoffrey K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4
_version_ 1783357086261837824
author So, Ralph K. L.
Bannard-Smith, Jonathan
Subbe, Chris P.
Jones, Daryl A.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Lighthall, Geoffrey K.
author_facet So, Ralph K. L.
Bannard-Smith, Jonathan
Subbe, Chris P.
Jones, Daryl A.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Lighthall, Geoffrey K.
author_sort So, Ralph K. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of care. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency and association of frailty with clinical outcomes in patients subject to rapid response team (RRT) review. METHODS: In this multi-national prospective observational cohort study, centres with existing RRTs collected data over a 7-day period, with follow up of all patients at 24 h following their RRT call and at hospital discharge or 30 days following the event trigger (whichever came sooner). Investigators also collected data on the triggers and interventions provided and a bedside assessment on the level of patients’ frailty using a clinical frailty scale. RESULTS: Amongst 1133 patients, 40% were screened as frail, which was associated with older age (p < 0.001), admission under a medical speciality (p < 0.001), increased severity of illness at the time of the RRT review (p = 0.0047), and substantially higher frequency of limitations of care (p < 0.001). Importantly, 72% of patients screened as frail were either dead or dependent on hospital care by 30 days (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the significant risk factors for the composite endpoint “poor recovery” (died or were hospital-dependent by 30 days) were age (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001), frailty level (p < 0.001), existing limitation of care (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–3.0; p < 0.001), and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher frailty scores were associated with increased mortality and dependence on health care at 30 days. Our results indicate that frailty has an influence on the clinical trajectory of deteriorating patients and that such assessment should be included in discussion of goals and expectations of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR5535. Registered on 23 December 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6151016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61510162018-09-26 The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study So, Ralph K. L. Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Subbe, Chris P. Jones, Daryl A. van Rosmalen, Joost Lighthall, Geoffrey K. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis after a stressor event and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, the assessment of frailty may be an essential part of evaluation in any healthcare encounter that might result in an escalation of care. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency and association of frailty with clinical outcomes in patients subject to rapid response team (RRT) review. METHODS: In this multi-national prospective observational cohort study, centres with existing RRTs collected data over a 7-day period, with follow up of all patients at 24 h following their RRT call and at hospital discharge or 30 days following the event trigger (whichever came sooner). Investigators also collected data on the triggers and interventions provided and a bedside assessment on the level of patients’ frailty using a clinical frailty scale. RESULTS: Amongst 1133 patients, 40% were screened as frail, which was associated with older age (p < 0.001), admission under a medical speciality (p < 0.001), increased severity of illness at the time of the RRT review (p = 0.0047), and substantially higher frequency of limitations of care (p < 0.001). Importantly, 72% of patients screened as frail were either dead or dependent on hospital care by 30 days (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the significant risk factors for the composite endpoint “poor recovery” (died or were hospital-dependent by 30 days) were age (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001), frailty level (p < 0.001), existing limitation of care (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–3.0; p < 0.001), and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher frailty scores were associated with increased mortality and dependence on health care at 30 days. Our results indicate that frailty has an influence on the clinical trajectory of deteriorating patients and that such assessment should be included in discussion of goals and expectations of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR5535. Registered on 23 December 2015. BioMed Central 2018-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6151016/ /pubmed/30241490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
So, Ralph K. L.
Bannard-Smith, Jonathan
Subbe, Chris P.
Jones, Daryl A.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Lighthall, Geoffrey K.
The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title_full The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title_fullStr The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title_short The association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
title_sort association of clinical frailty with outcomes of patients reviewed by rapid response teams: an international prospective observational cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2136-4
work_keys_str_mv AT soralphkl theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT bannardsmithjonathan theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT subbechrisp theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT jonesdaryla theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT vanrosmalenjoost theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT lighthallgeoffreyk theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT theassociationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT soralphkl associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT bannardsmithjonathan associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT subbechrisp associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT jonesdaryla associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT vanrosmalenjoost associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT lighthallgeoffreyk associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT associationofclinicalfrailtywithoutcomesofpatientsreviewedbyrapidresponseteamsaninternationalprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy