Cargando…

Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS

Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godshaw, Joshua, Hopfer, Helene, Nelson, Jenny, Ebeler, Susan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609
_version_ 1783357186467954688
author Godshaw, Joshua
Hopfer, Helene
Nelson, Jenny
Ebeler, Susan E.
author_facet Godshaw, Joshua
Hopfer, Helene
Nelson, Jenny
Ebeler, Susan E.
author_sort Godshaw, Joshua
collection PubMed
description Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the (63)Cu:(65)Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6151594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61515942018-11-13 Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS Godshaw, Joshua Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan E. Molecules Article Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the (63)Cu:(65)Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines. MDPI 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6151594/ /pubmed/28946713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Godshaw, Joshua
Hopfer, Helene
Nelson, Jenny
Ebeler, Susan E.
Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_full Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_fullStr Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_short Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
title_sort comparison of dilution, filtration, and microwave digestion sample pretreatments in elemental profiling of wine by icp-ms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609
work_keys_str_mv AT godshawjoshua comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT hopferhelene comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT nelsonjenny comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms
AT ebelersusane comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms