Cargando…
Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS
Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferenc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609 |
_version_ | 1783357186467954688 |
---|---|
author | Godshaw, Joshua Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan E. |
author_facet | Godshaw, Joshua Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan E. |
author_sort | Godshaw, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the (63)Cu:(65)Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6151594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61515942018-11-13 Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS Godshaw, Joshua Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan E. Molecules Article Wine elemental composition varies by cultivar, geographic origin, viticultural and enological practices, and is often used for authenticity validation. Elemental analysis of wine by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is challenging due to the potential for non-spectral interferences and plasma instability arising from organic matrix components. Sample preparation mitigates these interferences, however, conflicting recommendations of best practices in ICP-MS analysis of wine have been reported. This study compared direct dilution, microwave-assisted acid digestion, and two filtration sample pretreatments, acidification prior to filtration and filtration followed by acidification, in elemental profiling of one white and three red table wines by ICP-MS. Of 43 monitored isotopes, 37 varied by sample preparation method, with significantly higher results of 17 isotopes in the microwave-digested samples. Both filtration treatments resulted in lower results for 11 isotopes compared to the other methods. Finally, isotope dilution determination of copper based on natural abundances and the (63)Cu:(65)Cu instrument response ratio agreed with external calibration and confirmed a significant sample preparation effect. Overall, microwave digestion did not compare favorably, and direct dilution was found to provide the best compromise between ease of use and result accuracy and precision, although all preparation strategies were able to differentiate the wines. MDPI 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6151594/ /pubmed/28946713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Godshaw, Joshua Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan E. Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title | Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title_full | Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title_short | Comparison of Dilution, Filtration, and Microwave Digestion Sample Pretreatments in Elemental Profiling of Wine by ICP-MS |
title_sort | comparison of dilution, filtration, and microwave digestion sample pretreatments in elemental profiling of wine by icp-ms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT godshawjoshua comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms AT hopferhelene comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms AT nelsonjenny comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms AT ebelersusane comparisonofdilutionfiltrationandmicrowavedigestionsamplepretreatmentsinelementalprofilingofwinebyicpms |