Cargando…

Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices for composite dose–volume histogram (DVH)–based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA). Composite IMRT QA for 15 cervical cancer patients was perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Ce, Yu, Wenliang, Zheng, Xiaomin, Zhou, Yongqiang, Gong, Changfei, Xie, Congying, Jin, Xiance
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry061
_version_ 1783357197185449984
author Han, Ce
Yu, Wenliang
Zheng, Xiaomin
Zhou, Yongqiang
Gong, Changfei
Xie, Congying
Jin, Xiance
author_facet Han, Ce
Yu, Wenliang
Zheng, Xiaomin
Zhou, Yongqiang
Gong, Changfei
Xie, Congying
Jin, Xiance
author_sort Han, Ce
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices for composite dose–volume histogram (DVH)–based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA). Composite IMRT QA for 15 cervical cancer patients was performed with ArcCHECK. The percentage dosimetric errors (%DEs) of DVH metrics when comparing treatment planning system and QA-reconstructed dose distribution, percentage gamma passing rates (%GPs) with different criteria for individual volumes and global gamma indices were evaluated, as well as their correlations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied in order to study the sensitivities of the global and individual volume gamma indices. Most %DEs of the DVH metrics were within 3%. The γ(PTV) and γ(rectum) were <80% at 2%/2 mm; apart from these two individual volume indices, all other individual volume gamma indices and global indices had acceptable %GPs. For the criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 4%/4 mm, individual volume-based %GPs and global %GPs were correlated in 11, 1 and 12 out of 24 %DE metrics, and in 5, 4 and 5 out of 24 %DE metrics, respectively. Individual volume–based %GPs had a higher percentage of correlation with DVH metrics (%DEs) compared with global %GPs in composite IMRT QA. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of individual volume %GPs were higher than those of global %GPs. In conclusion, individual volume–based %GPs had a higher correlation with %DEs of metrics and a higher sensitivity presented by ROC analysis compared with global %GPs for composite IMRT QA. Thus, use of individual volume-based 3D gamma indices was found to be feasible and sensitive for composite IMRT QA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6151639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61516392018-09-27 Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices Han, Ce Yu, Wenliang Zheng, Xiaomin Zhou, Yongqiang Gong, Changfei Xie, Congying Jin, Xiance J Radiat Res Regular Paper The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices for composite dose–volume histogram (DVH)–based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA). Composite IMRT QA for 15 cervical cancer patients was performed with ArcCHECK. The percentage dosimetric errors (%DEs) of DVH metrics when comparing treatment planning system and QA-reconstructed dose distribution, percentage gamma passing rates (%GPs) with different criteria for individual volumes and global gamma indices were evaluated, as well as their correlations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied in order to study the sensitivities of the global and individual volume gamma indices. Most %DEs of the DVH metrics were within 3%. The γ(PTV) and γ(rectum) were <80% at 2%/2 mm; apart from these two individual volume indices, all other individual volume gamma indices and global indices had acceptable %GPs. For the criteria of 2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 4%/4 mm, individual volume-based %GPs and global %GPs were correlated in 11, 1 and 12 out of 24 %DE metrics, and in 5, 4 and 5 out of 24 %DE metrics, respectively. Individual volume–based %GPs had a higher percentage of correlation with DVH metrics (%DEs) compared with global %GPs in composite IMRT QA. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of individual volume %GPs were higher than those of global %GPs. In conclusion, individual volume–based %GPs had a higher correlation with %DEs of metrics and a higher sensitivity presented by ROC analysis compared with global %GPs for composite IMRT QA. Thus, use of individual volume-based 3D gamma indices was found to be feasible and sensitive for composite IMRT QA. Oxford University Press 2018-09 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6151639/ /pubmed/30085157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry061 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Han, Ce
Yu, Wenliang
Zheng, Xiaomin
Zhou, Yongqiang
Gong, Changfei
Xie, Congying
Jin, Xiance
Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title_full Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title_fullStr Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title_full_unstemmed Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title_short Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3D gamma indices
title_sort composite qa for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume–based 3d gamma indices
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry061
work_keys_str_mv AT hance compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT yuwenliang compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT zhengxiaomin compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT zhouyongqiang compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT gongchangfei compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT xiecongying compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices
AT jinxiance compositeqaforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyusingindividualvolumebased3dgammaindices