Cargando…

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 122 patients with mUC who were previously treated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naiki, Taku, Iida, Keitaro, Etani, Toshiki, Nagai, Takashi, Tanaka, Yutaro, Sugiyama, Yosuke, Ando, Ryosuke, Hamamoto, Shuzo, Banno, Rika, Nagata, Daisuke, Kawai, Noriyasu, Yasui, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6152597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271215
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S172913
_version_ 1783357391076589568
author Naiki, Taku
Iida, Keitaro
Etani, Toshiki
Nagai, Takashi
Tanaka, Yutaro
Sugiyama, Yosuke
Ando, Ryosuke
Hamamoto, Shuzo
Banno, Rika
Nagata, Daisuke
Kawai, Noriyasu
Yasui, Takahiro
author_facet Naiki, Taku
Iida, Keitaro
Etani, Toshiki
Nagai, Takashi
Tanaka, Yutaro
Sugiyama, Yosuke
Ando, Ryosuke
Hamamoto, Shuzo
Banno, Rika
Nagata, Daisuke
Kawai, Noriyasu
Yasui, Takahiro
author_sort Naiki, Taku
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 122 patients with mUC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received second-line GD therapy from July 2010 to June 2016. This consisted of 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 40 mg/m(2) docetaxel on days 1 and 8 in each 21-day cycle. Using pooled cumulative data, we divided patients into the following three groups based on age: <65 years (Group A), from 65 to 74 years (Group B), and ≥75 years (Group C), and then the data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for treatment-related toxicities and assessed at every cycle by imaging studies. Kaplan–Meier curves were used for survival and recurrence analyses. Furthermore, potential prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed via univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 8.2 months (range: 2.1–100). The median number of treatment cycles was three (range: 1–16) in Group A, three (1–15) in Group B, and two (1–11) in Group C. The objective response rate was not significantly different between the three groups. In addition, PFS and OS from the start of second-line GD therapy were also not significantly different. According to univariate and multivariate analyses of the second-line GD-treated cohort, a good performance status was the only prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In Group C, myelosuppression including predominant neutropenia and anemia, fatigue, and nausea were the main common adverse events. However, the incidence of neutropenia and a reduction in platelets were not significantly different between the three groups. Treatment-related deaths did not occur in this study. CONCLUSION: In this study, GD combination therapy as a second-line treatment for mUC resulted in favorable tumor responses and few treatment-related toxicities, even among elderly patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6152597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61525972018-09-28 Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis Naiki, Taku Iida, Keitaro Etani, Toshiki Nagai, Takashi Tanaka, Yutaro Sugiyama, Yosuke Ando, Ryosuke Hamamoto, Shuzo Banno, Rika Nagata, Daisuke Kawai, Noriyasu Yasui, Takahiro Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 122 patients with mUC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received second-line GD therapy from July 2010 to June 2016. This consisted of 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 40 mg/m(2) docetaxel on days 1 and 8 in each 21-day cycle. Using pooled cumulative data, we divided patients into the following three groups based on age: <65 years (Group A), from 65 to 74 years (Group B), and ≥75 years (Group C), and then the data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for treatment-related toxicities and assessed at every cycle by imaging studies. Kaplan–Meier curves were used for survival and recurrence analyses. Furthermore, potential prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed via univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 8.2 months (range: 2.1–100). The median number of treatment cycles was three (range: 1–16) in Group A, three (1–15) in Group B, and two (1–11) in Group C. The objective response rate was not significantly different between the three groups. In addition, PFS and OS from the start of second-line GD therapy were also not significantly different. According to univariate and multivariate analyses of the second-line GD-treated cohort, a good performance status was the only prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In Group C, myelosuppression including predominant neutropenia and anemia, fatigue, and nausea were the main common adverse events. However, the incidence of neutropenia and a reduction in platelets were not significantly different between the three groups. Treatment-related deaths did not occur in this study. CONCLUSION: In this study, GD combination therapy as a second-line treatment for mUC resulted in favorable tumor responses and few treatment-related toxicities, even among elderly patients. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6152597/ /pubmed/30271215 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S172913 Text en © 2018 Naiki et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Naiki, Taku
Iida, Keitaro
Etani, Toshiki
Nagai, Takashi
Tanaka, Yutaro
Sugiyama, Yosuke
Ando, Ryosuke
Hamamoto, Shuzo
Banno, Rika
Nagata, Daisuke
Kawai, Noriyasu
Yasui, Takahiro
Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title_short Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
title_sort gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6152597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271215
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S172913
work_keys_str_mv AT naikitaku gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT iidakeitaro gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT etanitoshiki gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT nagaitakashi gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT tanakayutaro gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sugiyamayosuke gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT andoryosuke gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hamamotoshuzo gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bannorika gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT nagatadaisuke gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kawainoriyasu gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yasuitakahiro gemcitabineanddocetaxelassecondlinechemotherapyinelderlypatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysis