Cargando…

Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study

BACKGROUND: Community Health Workers (CHWs) have a crucial role in improving health in their communities and their role is being expanded in many parts of the world. However, the effectiveness of CHWs is limited by poor training and the education of CHWs has received little scientific attention. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plowright, Alexandra, Taylor, Celia, Davies, David, Sartori, Jo, Hundt, Gillian Lewando, Lilford, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6152868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202817
_version_ 1783357441847590912
author Plowright, Alexandra
Taylor, Celia
Davies, David
Sartori, Jo
Hundt, Gillian Lewando
Lilford, Richard J.
author_facet Plowright, Alexandra
Taylor, Celia
Davies, David
Sartori, Jo
Hundt, Gillian Lewando
Lilford, Richard J.
author_sort Plowright, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community Health Workers (CHWs) have a crucial role in improving health in their communities and their role is being expanded in many parts of the world. However, the effectiveness of CHWs is limited by poor training and the education of CHWs has received little scientific attention. METHODS: Our study was carried out in two districts of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We developed and piloted an inexpensive (two day) training intervention covering national government priorities: HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted disease and Tuberculosis; and Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Sixty-four CHWs consented to participate in the main study which measured knowledge gains using a modified Solomon design of four different testing schedules to distinguish between the effects of the intervention, testing and any interaction between intervention and testing. We also measured confidence, satisfaction and costs. RESULTS: Following the training intervention, improvements in knowledge scores were seen across topics and across districts. These changes in knowledge were statistically significant (p<0.001) and of large magnitude (over 45 percentage points or four standard deviations). However, the CHWs assigned to the test-test-train schedule in one district showed high gains in knowledge prior to receiving the training. All CHWs reported high levels of satisfaction with the training and marked improvements in their confidence in advising clients. The training cost around US$48 per CHW per day and has the potential to be cost-effective if the large gains in knowledge are translated into improved field-based performance and thus health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Training CHWs can result in large improvements in knowledge with a short intervention. However, improvements seen in other studies could be due to test ‘reactivity’. Further work is needed to measure the generalisability of our results, retention of knowledge and the extent to which improved knowledge is translated into improved practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6152868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61528682018-10-19 Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study Plowright, Alexandra Taylor, Celia Davies, David Sartori, Jo Hundt, Gillian Lewando Lilford, Richard J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Community Health Workers (CHWs) have a crucial role in improving health in their communities and their role is being expanded in many parts of the world. However, the effectiveness of CHWs is limited by poor training and the education of CHWs has received little scientific attention. METHODS: Our study was carried out in two districts of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We developed and piloted an inexpensive (two day) training intervention covering national government priorities: HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted disease and Tuberculosis; and Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Sixty-four CHWs consented to participate in the main study which measured knowledge gains using a modified Solomon design of four different testing schedules to distinguish between the effects of the intervention, testing and any interaction between intervention and testing. We also measured confidence, satisfaction and costs. RESULTS: Following the training intervention, improvements in knowledge scores were seen across topics and across districts. These changes in knowledge were statistically significant (p<0.001) and of large magnitude (over 45 percentage points or four standard deviations). However, the CHWs assigned to the test-test-train schedule in one district showed high gains in knowledge prior to receiving the training. All CHWs reported high levels of satisfaction with the training and marked improvements in their confidence in advising clients. The training cost around US$48 per CHW per day and has the potential to be cost-effective if the large gains in knowledge are translated into improved field-based performance and thus health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Training CHWs can result in large improvements in knowledge with a short intervention. However, improvements seen in other studies could be due to test ‘reactivity’. Further work is needed to measure the generalisability of our results, retention of knowledge and the extent to which improved knowledge is translated into improved practice. Public Library of Science 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6152868/ /pubmed/30248100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202817 Text en © 2018 Plowright et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plowright, Alexandra
Taylor, Celia
Davies, David
Sartori, Jo
Hundt, Gillian Lewando
Lilford, Richard J.
Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title_full Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title_fullStr Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title_full_unstemmed Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title_short Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study
title_sort formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in south africa: a before and after study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6152868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202817
work_keys_str_mv AT plowrightalexandra formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy
AT taylorcelia formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy
AT daviesdavid formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy
AT sartorijo formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy
AT hundtgillianlewando formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy
AT lilfordrichardj formativeevaluationofatraininginterventionforcommunityhealthworkersinsouthafricaabeforeandafterstudy