Association of TCF7L2 mutation and atypical diabetes in a Uruguayan population

AIM: To investigate if mutations in TCF7L2 are associated with “atypical diabetes” in the Uruguayan population. METHODS: Healthy, nondiabetic controls (n = 133) and patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 177) were selected from among the presenting population at level-3 referral healthcare centers in Uruguay. Patients with type 2 diabetes were subgrouped according to “atypical diabetes” (n = 92) and “classical diabetes” (n = 85). Genotyping for the rs12255372 and rs7903146 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TCFTL2 gene was carried out with TaqMan(®) probes. Random samples were sequenced by Macrogen Ltd. (South Korea). Statistical analysis of the SNP data was carried out with the SNPStats online tool (http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/SNPstats). The best inheritance model was chosen according to the lowest values of Akaike’s information criterion and Bayesian information criterion. Differences between groups were determined by unpaired t-tests after checking the normal distribution or were converted to normalize the data. The association of SNPs was tested for matched case-control samples by using χ(2) analysis and calculation of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were performed using SPSS v10.0 and EpiInfo7 statistical packages. Significant statistical differences were assumed in all cases showing adjusted P < 0.05. RESULTS: We genotyped two TCF7L2 SNPs (rs7903146 and rs12255372) in a population-based sample of 310 Uruguayan subjects, including 133 healthy control subjects and 177 clinical diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. For both SNPs analyzed, the best model was the dominant type: rs12255372 = G/G vs G/T+T/T, OR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.40-0.98, P < 0.05 and rs7903146 = C/C vs C/T+T/T, OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.41-1.55, P = 0.3. The rs12255372 SNP showed high association with the type 2 diabetes cases (OR = 1.60, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51, P < 0.05). However, when the type 2 diabetics group was analyzed according to the atypical and classical subgroupings, the association with diabetes existed only for rs12255372 and the classical subgroup (vs controls: OR = 2.1, 95%CI: 1.21-3.75, P < 0.05); no significant differences were found for either SNP or atypical diabetes. CONCLUSION: This is the first time SNPs_TCF7L2 were genotyped in a diabetic population stratified by genotype instead of phenotype. Classical and atypical patients showed statistical differences.