Cargando…

FOLFIRI3-aflibercept in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFIRI3-aflibercept as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the association of aflibercept with FOLFIRI3 (day 1: afliberc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carola, Candice, Ghiringhelli, François, Kim, Stefano, André, Thierry, Barlet, Juliette, Bengrine-Lefevre, Leïla, Marijon, Hélène, Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line, Borg, Christophe, Dainese, Linda, Steuer, Nils, Richa, Hubert, Benetkiewicz, Magdalena, Larsen, Annette K, de Gramont, Aimery, Chibaudel, Benoist
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30254966
http://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v9.i5.110
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFIRI3-aflibercept as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the association of aflibercept with FOLFIRI3 (day 1: aflibercept 4 mg/kg, folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), irinotecan 90 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m(2) per 46 h; day 3: irinotecan 90 mg/m(2)) in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Among 74 patients treated in four French centers, nine were excluded due to prior use of aflibercept (n = 3), more than one prior treatment line in irinotecan-naïve patients (n = 3), and inadequate liver function (n = 3). In the “irinotecan-naïve” patients (n = 30), ORR was 43.3% and DCR was 76.7%. Median PFS and OS were 11.3 mo (95%CI: 6.1-29.0) and 17.0 mo (95%CI: 13.0-17.3), respectively. The most common (> 5%) grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhea (37.9%), neutropenia (14.3%), stomatitis and anemia (10.4%), and hypertension (6.7%). In the “pre-exposed irinotecan” patients (n = 35), 20 (57.1%) received ≥ 2 prior lines of treatment. ORR was 34.3% and DCR was 60.0%. Median PFS and OS were 5.7 mo (95%CI: 3.9-10.4) and 14.3 mo (95%CI: 12.8-19.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: Minimally modified FOLFIRI has improvement dramatically the FOLFIRI3-aflibercept efficacy, whatever prior use of irinotecan. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to compare FOLFIRI-aflibercept to FOLFIRI3-aflibercept.