Cargando…

Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)

BACKGROUND: Previous research has examined patient perceptions of insulin injection devices. However, injectable medications other than insulin are increasingly used to treat type 2 diabetes, including GLP-1 receptor agonists. No patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed taking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matza, Louis S., Boye, Kristina S., Stewart, Katie D., Paczkowski, Rosirene, Jordan, Jessica, Murray, Lindsey T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0068-z
_version_ 1783357473092009984
author Matza, Louis S.
Boye, Kristina S.
Stewart, Katie D.
Paczkowski, Rosirene
Jordan, Jessica
Murray, Lindsey T.
author_facet Matza, Louis S.
Boye, Kristina S.
Stewart, Katie D.
Paczkowski, Rosirene
Jordan, Jessica
Murray, Lindsey T.
author_sort Matza, Louis S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research has examined patient perceptions of insulin injection devices. However, injectable medications other than insulin are increasingly used to treat type 2 diabetes, including GLP-1 receptor agonists. No patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed taking into account the experiences of patients using newer injection devices, which are often different from devices used for insulin. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to develop two draft PRO instruments focusing on patients’ experiences with these newer injection devices (one instrument assessing perceptions of a single injection device, and another assessing preferences between two devices). METHODS: Questionnaire development proceeded in six steps: literature review, interviews with six device experts, concept elicitation interviews with patients (N = 32), preliminary translatability assessment, cognitive interviews with patients (N = 20), and final translatability assessment. RESULTS: Literature review and expert interviews were conducted to inform a concept elicitation interview guide. In concept elicitation in the US, UK, and Germany, patients with type 2 diabetes reported a range of injection features that influenced their perceptions of non-insulin injection devices (e.g., requirements for preparation of the medication/device, issues related to the needle, ease-of-use, portability). Two draft “item pools” were developed based on the literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation results. In cognitive interviews, patients recommended minor revisions and indicated that the draft instruments were generally clear, comprehensible, and relevant to their experience with non-insulin injectable medication. The instruments were refined based on the cognitive interviews and translatability assessment, resulting in two questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The various steps of qualitative research support the content validity of these new PRO instruments, which are the first developed specifically to assess perceptions of non-insulin injection delivery systems. Despite some overlap with insulin-focused questionnaires, the new instruments are distinct from previous instruments (omitting content that would not be relevant to patients receiving non-insulin injectable treatment, while including content that is not included in the insulin focused instruments). This qualitative research yielded two draft questionnaires that are grounded in patient perceptions and ready for psychometric validation studies with larger samples of patients with type 2 diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61532582018-10-04 Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ) Matza, Louis S. Boye, Kristina S. Stewart, Katie D. Paczkowski, Rosirene Jordan, Jessica Murray, Lindsey T. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Previous research has examined patient perceptions of insulin injection devices. However, injectable medications other than insulin are increasingly used to treat type 2 diabetes, including GLP-1 receptor agonists. No patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed taking into account the experiences of patients using newer injection devices, which are often different from devices used for insulin. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to develop two draft PRO instruments focusing on patients’ experiences with these newer injection devices (one instrument assessing perceptions of a single injection device, and another assessing preferences between two devices). METHODS: Questionnaire development proceeded in six steps: literature review, interviews with six device experts, concept elicitation interviews with patients (N = 32), preliminary translatability assessment, cognitive interviews with patients (N = 20), and final translatability assessment. RESULTS: Literature review and expert interviews were conducted to inform a concept elicitation interview guide. In concept elicitation in the US, UK, and Germany, patients with type 2 diabetes reported a range of injection features that influenced their perceptions of non-insulin injection devices (e.g., requirements for preparation of the medication/device, issues related to the needle, ease-of-use, portability). Two draft “item pools” were developed based on the literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation results. In cognitive interviews, patients recommended minor revisions and indicated that the draft instruments were generally clear, comprehensible, and relevant to their experience with non-insulin injectable medication. The instruments were refined based on the cognitive interviews and translatability assessment, resulting in two questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The various steps of qualitative research support the content validity of these new PRO instruments, which are the first developed specifically to assess perceptions of non-insulin injection delivery systems. Despite some overlap with insulin-focused questionnaires, the new instruments are distinct from previous instruments (omitting content that would not be relevant to patients receiving non-insulin injectable treatment, while including content that is not included in the insulin focused instruments). This qualitative research yielded two draft questionnaires that are grounded in patient perceptions and ready for psychometric validation studies with larger samples of patients with type 2 diabetes. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6153258/ /pubmed/30294713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0068-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Matza, Louis S.
Boye, Kristina S.
Stewart, Katie D.
Paczkowski, Rosirene
Jordan, Jessica
Murray, Lindsey T.
Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title_full Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title_fullStr Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title_short Development of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ)
title_sort development of the diabetes injection device experience questionnaire (did-eq) and diabetes injection device preference questionnaire (did-pq)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0068-z
work_keys_str_mv AT matzalouiss developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq
AT boyekristinas developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq
AT stewartkatied developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq
AT paczkowskirosirene developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq
AT jordanjessica developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq
AT murraylindseyt developmentofthediabetesinjectiondeviceexperiencequestionnairedideqanddiabetesinjectiondevicepreferencequestionnairedidpq