Cargando…
Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452 |
_version_ | 1783357521827725312 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Tyler Oak, Sameer R. Subhas, Naveen Polster, Joshua Winalski, Carl Spindler, Kurt P. |
author_facet | Marshall, Tyler Oak, Sameer R. Subhas, Naveen Polster, Joshua Winalski, Carl Spindler, Kurt P. |
author_sort | Marshall, Tyler |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains inconsistent across the literature. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were 2-fold. The first objective was to further investigate the appearance of the uninjured ALL on MRI and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying the ligament. The second objective was to describe the incidence of concomitant ALL injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–injured knees and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying and grading these injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Fifty consecutive MRI scans of non–ACL-injured knees (control) and 50 consecutive MRI scans of ACL-injured knees performed at a single sports medicine center were identified. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI scans in a randomized and blinded fashion. In the control group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not and did so for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the ligament. In the ACL tear group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not for each third of the ligament. They noted whether the ligament was injured and graded the injury as low, intermediate, or high. RESULTS: All 3 segments of the ALL were visualized in a mean 11% of patients. The ALL was partially visualized in a mean 68% of patients. The distal third of the ALL was injured 28% (14/50) of the time in the ACL tear group. The agreement rate among raters for classifying the injury status was fair to poor. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the ALL was inconsistent in the current study. Identifying and grading an injury to the ALL were difficult and had poor interobserver agreement. Using MRI to aid in the diagnosis of an ALL injury in the setting of an ACL tear is unreliable according to our study results. Further research looking at consistent ALL identification and injury patterns should be undertaken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6153540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61535402018-09-27 Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging? Marshall, Tyler Oak, Sameer R. Subhas, Naveen Polster, Joshua Winalski, Carl Spindler, Kurt P. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains inconsistent across the literature. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were 2-fold. The first objective was to further investigate the appearance of the uninjured ALL on MRI and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying the ligament. The second objective was to describe the incidence of concomitant ALL injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–injured knees and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying and grading these injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Fifty consecutive MRI scans of non–ACL-injured knees (control) and 50 consecutive MRI scans of ACL-injured knees performed at a single sports medicine center were identified. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI scans in a randomized and blinded fashion. In the control group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not and did so for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the ligament. In the ACL tear group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not for each third of the ligament. They noted whether the ligament was injured and graded the injury as low, intermediate, or high. RESULTS: All 3 segments of the ALL were visualized in a mean 11% of patients. The ALL was partially visualized in a mean 68% of patients. The distal third of the ALL was injured 28% (14/50) of the time in the ACL tear group. The agreement rate among raters for classifying the injury status was fair to poor. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the ALL was inconsistent in the current study. Identifying and grading an injury to the ALL were difficult and had poor interobserver agreement. Using MRI to aid in the diagnosis of an ALL injury in the setting of an ACL tear is unreliable according to our study results. Further research looking at consistent ALL identification and injury patterns should be undertaken. SAGE Publications 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6153540/ /pubmed/30263895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Marshall, Tyler Oak, Sameer R. Subhas, Naveen Polster, Joshua Winalski, Carl Spindler, Kurt P. Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title | Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior
Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T
Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title_full | Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior
Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T
Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title_fullStr | Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior
Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T
Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior
Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T
Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title_short | Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior
Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T
Magnetic Resonance Imaging? |
title_sort | can the anterolateral ligament be reliably identified in anterior
cruciate ligament–intact and anterior cruciate ligament–injured knees on 3-t
magnetic resonance imaging? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshalltyler cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging AT oaksameerr cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging AT subhasnaveen cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging AT polsterjoshua cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging AT winalskicarl cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging AT spindlerkurtp cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging |