Cargando…

Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Tyler, Oak, Sameer R., Subhas, Naveen, Polster, Joshua, Winalski, Carl, Spindler, Kurt P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452
_version_ 1783357521827725312
author Marshall, Tyler
Oak, Sameer R.
Subhas, Naveen
Polster, Joshua
Winalski, Carl
Spindler, Kurt P.
author_facet Marshall, Tyler
Oak, Sameer R.
Subhas, Naveen
Polster, Joshua
Winalski, Carl
Spindler, Kurt P.
author_sort Marshall, Tyler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains inconsistent across the literature. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were 2-fold. The first objective was to further investigate the appearance of the uninjured ALL on MRI and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying the ligament. The second objective was to describe the incidence of concomitant ALL injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–injured knees and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying and grading these injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Fifty consecutive MRI scans of non–ACL-injured knees (control) and 50 consecutive MRI scans of ACL-injured knees performed at a single sports medicine center were identified. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI scans in a randomized and blinded fashion. In the control group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not and did so for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the ligament. In the ACL tear group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not for each third of the ligament. They noted whether the ligament was injured and graded the injury as low, intermediate, or high. RESULTS: All 3 segments of the ALL were visualized in a mean 11% of patients. The ALL was partially visualized in a mean 68% of patients. The distal third of the ALL was injured 28% (14/50) of the time in the ACL tear group. The agreement rate among raters for classifying the injury status was fair to poor. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the ALL was inconsistent in the current study. Identifying and grading an injury to the ALL were difficult and had poor interobserver agreement. Using MRI to aid in the diagnosis of an ALL injury in the setting of an ACL tear is unreliable according to our study results. Further research looking at consistent ALL identification and injury patterns should be undertaken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61535402018-09-27 Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging? Marshall, Tyler Oak, Sameer R. Subhas, Naveen Polster, Joshua Winalski, Carl Spindler, Kurt P. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described as an extracapsular stabilizer of knee rotational stability. Investigators have shown a renewed interest in the ALL and further evaluated its anatomy and biomechanical role as a knee stabilizer. The appearance of the ALL on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains inconsistent across the literature. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were 2-fold. The first objective was to further investigate the appearance of the uninjured ALL on MRI and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying the ligament. The second objective was to describe the incidence of concomitant ALL injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–injured knees and provide data regarding interrater agreement in identifying and grading these injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Fifty consecutive MRI scans of non–ACL-injured knees (control) and 50 consecutive MRI scans of ACL-injured knees performed at a single sports medicine center were identified. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI scans in a randomized and blinded fashion. In the control group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not and did so for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the ligament. In the ACL tear group, the reviewers classified the ALL as visualized or not for each third of the ligament. They noted whether the ligament was injured and graded the injury as low, intermediate, or high. RESULTS: All 3 segments of the ALL were visualized in a mean 11% of patients. The ALL was partially visualized in a mean 68% of patients. The distal third of the ALL was injured 28% (14/50) of the time in the ACL tear group. The agreement rate among raters for classifying the injury status was fair to poor. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the ALL was inconsistent in the current study. Identifying and grading an injury to the ALL were difficult and had poor interobserver agreement. Using MRI to aid in the diagnosis of an ALL injury in the setting of an ACL tear is unreliable according to our study results. Further research looking at consistent ALL identification and injury patterns should be undertaken. SAGE Publications 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6153540/ /pubmed/30263895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Marshall, Tyler
Oak, Sameer R.
Subhas, Naveen
Polster, Joshua
Winalski, Carl
Spindler, Kurt P.
Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_full Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_fullStr Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_short Can the Anterolateral Ligament Be Reliably Identified in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knees on 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_sort can the anterolateral ligament be reliably identified in anterior cruciate ligament–intact and anterior cruciate ligament–injured knees on 3-t magnetic resonance imaging?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118796452
work_keys_str_mv AT marshalltyler cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging
AT oaksameerr cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging
AT subhasnaveen cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging
AT polsterjoshua cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging
AT winalskicarl cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging
AT spindlerkurtp cantheanterolateralligamentbereliablyidentifiedinanteriorcruciateligamentintactandanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredkneeson3tmagneticresonanceimaging