Cargando…

Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levink, IJM, Bruno, MJ, Cahen, DL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2
_version_ 1783357528990547968
author Levink, IJM
Bruno, MJ
Cahen, DL
author_facet Levink, IJM
Bruno, MJ
Cahen, DL
author_sort Levink, IJM
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these discrepancies, in order to guide treating physicians in clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: The detection rate of pancreatic cysts has increased substantially with the expanded use of high-quality imaging techniques to up to 45%. Of these cysts, 24–82% are IPMNs, which harbour a malignant potential. Timely detection of high-risk lesions is therefore of great importance. Surgical management is based on the presence of clinical and morphological high-risk features, yet the majority of resected specimens appear to be low risk. SUMMARY: International collaboration and incentive large-scale prospective registries of individuals undergoing cyst surveillance are needed to accumulate unbiased data and develop evidence-based guidelines. Additionally, development of non-invasive, accurate diagnostic tools (e.g. biomarkers) is needed to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect malignant transformation at an early stage (i.e. high-grade dysplasia).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61535702018-10-09 Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives Levink, IJM Bruno, MJ Cahen, DL Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these discrepancies, in order to guide treating physicians in clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: The detection rate of pancreatic cysts has increased substantially with the expanded use of high-quality imaging techniques to up to 45%. Of these cysts, 24–82% are IPMNs, which harbour a malignant potential. Timely detection of high-risk lesions is therefore of great importance. Surgical management is based on the presence of clinical and morphological high-risk features, yet the majority of resected specimens appear to be low risk. SUMMARY: International collaboration and incentive large-scale prospective registries of individuals undergoing cyst surveillance are needed to accumulate unbiased data and develop evidence-based guidelines. Additionally, development of non-invasive, accurate diagnostic tools (e.g. biomarkers) is needed to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect malignant transformation at an early stage (i.e. high-grade dysplasia). Springer US 2018-09-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6153570/ /pubmed/30196428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor)
Levink, IJM
Bruno, MJ
Cahen, DL
Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title_full Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title_fullStr Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title_short Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
title_sort management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: controversies in guidelines and future perspectives
topic Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2
work_keys_str_mv AT levinkijm managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives
AT brunomj managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives
AT cahendl managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives