Cargando…
Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2 |
_version_ | 1783357528990547968 |
---|---|
author | Levink, IJM Bruno, MJ Cahen, DL |
author_facet | Levink, IJM Bruno, MJ Cahen, DL |
author_sort | Levink, IJM |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these discrepancies, in order to guide treating physicians in clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: The detection rate of pancreatic cysts has increased substantially with the expanded use of high-quality imaging techniques to up to 45%. Of these cysts, 24–82% are IPMNs, which harbour a malignant potential. Timely detection of high-risk lesions is therefore of great importance. Surgical management is based on the presence of clinical and morphological high-risk features, yet the majority of resected specimens appear to be low risk. SUMMARY: International collaboration and incentive large-scale prospective registries of individuals undergoing cyst surveillance are needed to accumulate unbiased data and develop evidence-based guidelines. Additionally, development of non-invasive, accurate diagnostic tools (e.g. biomarkers) is needed to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect malignant transformation at an early stage (i.e. high-grade dysplasia). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6153570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61535702018-10-09 Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives Levink, IJM Bruno, MJ Cahen, DL Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is currently based on consensus, in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. In recent years, several consensus guidelines have been published, with distinct management strategies. In this review, we will discuss these discrepancies, in order to guide treating physicians in clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: The detection rate of pancreatic cysts has increased substantially with the expanded use of high-quality imaging techniques to up to 45%. Of these cysts, 24–82% are IPMNs, which harbour a malignant potential. Timely detection of high-risk lesions is therefore of great importance. Surgical management is based on the presence of clinical and morphological high-risk features, yet the majority of resected specimens appear to be low risk. SUMMARY: International collaboration and incentive large-scale prospective registries of individuals undergoing cyst surveillance are needed to accumulate unbiased data and develop evidence-based guidelines. Additionally, development of non-invasive, accurate diagnostic tools (e.g. biomarkers) is needed to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect malignant transformation at an early stage (i.e. high-grade dysplasia). Springer US 2018-09-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6153570/ /pubmed/30196428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) Levink, IJM Bruno, MJ Cahen, DL Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title | Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title_full | Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title_short | Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives |
title_sort | management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: controversies in guidelines and future perspectives |
topic | Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0190-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levinkijm managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives AT brunomj managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives AT cahendl managementofintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmscontroversiesinguidelinesandfutureperspectives |