Cargando…
A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors
Objective. The use of cerebrospinal shunts is the standard of care for hydrocephalus. However, shunts are extremely vulnerable to failure and lack noninvasive methods to monitor their viability. We review current shunt technologies and attempts to improve their function. Methods. A PubMed search was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
YJBM
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258318 |
_version_ | 1783357540453580800 |
---|---|
author | Soler, Garrett J. Bao, Mengdi Jaiswal, Devina Zaveri, Hitten P. DiLuna, Michael L. Grant, Ryan A. Hoshino, Kazunori |
author_facet | Soler, Garrett J. Bao, Mengdi Jaiswal, Devina Zaveri, Hitten P. DiLuna, Michael L. Grant, Ryan A. Hoshino, Kazunori |
author_sort | Soler, Garrett J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. The use of cerebrospinal shunts is the standard of care for hydrocephalus. However, shunts are extremely vulnerable to failure and lack noninvasive methods to monitor their viability. We review current shunt technologies and attempts to improve their function. Methods. A PubMed search was performed to find literature on shunts and shunt function. Company brochures and websites were also used. Results. Fixed and variable pressure valves from four major companies are discussed. Also reviewed are siphon resistive devices, intracranial pressure sensors, and recent attempts on the development of cerebrospinal fluid sensors, including a micromechanical flow sensor we have recently developed. Conclusions. While variable pressure valves and siphon resistive devices have both had considerable success in dealing with variable intracranial pressure, a more sophisticated, continuous monitoring system is needed to ensure shunt viability and patient safety. An integrated flow sensor may provide the ability to track fluid flow and determine shunt functionality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6153620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | YJBM |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61536202018-09-26 A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors Soler, Garrett J. Bao, Mengdi Jaiswal, Devina Zaveri, Hitten P. DiLuna, Michael L. Grant, Ryan A. Hoshino, Kazunori Yale J Biol Med Review Objective. The use of cerebrospinal shunts is the standard of care for hydrocephalus. However, shunts are extremely vulnerable to failure and lack noninvasive methods to monitor their viability. We review current shunt technologies and attempts to improve their function. Methods. A PubMed search was performed to find literature on shunts and shunt function. Company brochures and websites were also used. Results. Fixed and variable pressure valves from four major companies are discussed. Also reviewed are siphon resistive devices, intracranial pressure sensors, and recent attempts on the development of cerebrospinal fluid sensors, including a micromechanical flow sensor we have recently developed. Conclusions. While variable pressure valves and siphon resistive devices have both had considerable success in dealing with variable intracranial pressure, a more sophisticated, continuous monitoring system is needed to ensure shunt viability and patient safety. An integrated flow sensor may provide the ability to track fluid flow and determine shunt functionality. YJBM 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6153620/ /pubmed/30258318 Text en Copyright ©2018, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Soler, Garrett J. Bao, Mengdi Jaiswal, Devina Zaveri, Hitten P. DiLuna, Michael L. Grant, Ryan A. Hoshino, Kazunori A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title | A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title_full | A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title_fullStr | A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title_short | A Review of Cerebral Shunts, Current Technologies, and Future Endeavors |
title_sort | review of cerebral shunts, current technologies, and future endeavors |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solergarrettj areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT baomengdi areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT jaiswaldevina areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT zaverihittenp areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT dilunamichaell areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT grantryana areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT hoshinokazunori areviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT solergarrettj reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT baomengdi reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT jaiswaldevina reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT zaverihittenp reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT dilunamichaell reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT grantryana reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors AT hoshinokazunori reviewofcerebralshuntscurrenttechnologiesandfutureendeavors |