Cargando…

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs

Objectives In this large scale, mixed methods evaluation, we determined the impact and context of early childhood home visiting on rates of child abuse-related injury. Methods Entropy-balanced and propensity score matched retrospective cohort analysis comparing children of Pennsylvania Nurse–Family...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matone, M., Kellom, K., Griffis, H., Quarshie, W., Faerber, J., Gierlach, P., Whittaker, J., Rubin, D. M., Cronholm, P. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1
_version_ 1783357569701511168
author Matone, M.
Kellom, K.
Griffis, H.
Quarshie, W.
Faerber, J.
Gierlach, P.
Whittaker, J.
Rubin, D. M.
Cronholm, P. F.
author_facet Matone, M.
Kellom, K.
Griffis, H.
Quarshie, W.
Faerber, J.
Gierlach, P.
Whittaker, J.
Rubin, D. M.
Cronholm, P. F.
author_sort Matone, M.
collection PubMed
description Objectives In this large scale, mixed methods evaluation, we determined the impact and context of early childhood home visiting on rates of child abuse-related injury. Methods Entropy-balanced and propensity score matched retrospective cohort analysis comparing children of Pennsylvania Nurse–Family Partnership (NFP), Parents As Teachers (PAT), and Early Head Start (EHS) enrollees and children of Pennsylvania Medicaid eligible women from 2008 to 2014. Abuse-related injury episodes were identified in medical assistance claims with ICD-9 codes. Weighted frequencies and logistic regression odds of injury within 24 months are presented. In-depth interviews with staff and clients (n = 150) from 11 programs were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results The odds of a healthcare encounter for early childhood abuse among clients were significantly greater than comparison children (NFP: 1.32, 95% CI [1.08, 1.62]; PAT: 4.11, 95% CI [1.60, 10.55]; EHS: 3.15, 95% CI [1.41, 7.06]). Qualitative data illustrated the circumstances of and program response to client issues related to child maltreatment, highlighting the role of non-client caregivers. All stakeholders described curricular content aimed at prevention (e.g. positive parenting) with little time dedicated to addressing current or past abuse. Clients who reported a lack of abuse-related content supposed their home visitor’s assumption of an absence of risk in their home, but were supportive of the introduction of abuse-related content. Approach, acceptance, and available resources were mediators of successfully addressing abuse. Conclusions for Practice Home visiting aims to prevent child abuse among high-risk families. Adequate home visitor capacity to proactively assess abuse risk, deliver effective preventive curriculum with fidelity to caregivers, and access appropriate resources is necessary. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61537662018-10-04 A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs Matone, M. Kellom, K. Griffis, H. Quarshie, W. Faerber, J. Gierlach, P. Whittaker, J. Rubin, D. M. Cronholm, P. F. Matern Child Health J Article Objectives In this large scale, mixed methods evaluation, we determined the impact and context of early childhood home visiting on rates of child abuse-related injury. Methods Entropy-balanced and propensity score matched retrospective cohort analysis comparing children of Pennsylvania Nurse–Family Partnership (NFP), Parents As Teachers (PAT), and Early Head Start (EHS) enrollees and children of Pennsylvania Medicaid eligible women from 2008 to 2014. Abuse-related injury episodes were identified in medical assistance claims with ICD-9 codes. Weighted frequencies and logistic regression odds of injury within 24 months are presented. In-depth interviews with staff and clients (n = 150) from 11 programs were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results The odds of a healthcare encounter for early childhood abuse among clients were significantly greater than comparison children (NFP: 1.32, 95% CI [1.08, 1.62]; PAT: 4.11, 95% CI [1.60, 10.55]; EHS: 3.15, 95% CI [1.41, 7.06]). Qualitative data illustrated the circumstances of and program response to client issues related to child maltreatment, highlighting the role of non-client caregivers. All stakeholders described curricular content aimed at prevention (e.g. positive parenting) with little time dedicated to addressing current or past abuse. Clients who reported a lack of abuse-related content supposed their home visitor’s assumption of an absence of risk in their home, but were supportive of the introduction of abuse-related content. Approach, acceptance, and available resources were mediators of successfully addressing abuse. Conclusions for Practice Home visiting aims to prevent child abuse among high-risk families. Adequate home visitor capacity to proactively assess abuse risk, deliver effective preventive curriculum with fidelity to caregivers, and access appropriate resources is necessary. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-05-31 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6153766/ /pubmed/29855837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018, Corrected publication August/2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Matone, M.
Kellom, K.
Griffis, H.
Quarshie, W.
Faerber, J.
Gierlach, P.
Whittaker, J.
Rubin, D. M.
Cronholm, P. F.
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title_full A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title_fullStr A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title_short A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Early Childhood Abuse Prevention Within Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of early childhood abuse prevention within evidence-based home visiting programs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1
work_keys_str_mv AT matonem amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT kellomk amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT griffish amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT quarshiew amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT faerberj amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT gierlachp amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT whittakerj amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT rubindm amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT cronholmpf amixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT matonem mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT kellomk mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT griffish mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT quarshiew mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT faerberj mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT gierlachp mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT whittakerj mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT rubindm mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms
AT cronholmpf mixedmethodsevaluationofearlychildhoodabusepreventionwithinevidencebasedhomevisitingprograms