Cargando…

Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure

Anaerobic digestion (AD) uses a range of substrates to generate biogas, including energy crops such as globally abundant rice straw (RS). Unfortunately, RS is high in lignocellulosic material and has high to C:N ratios (~80:1), which makes it (alone) a comparatively poor substrate for AD. Co-digesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zealand, A. M., Mei, R., Papachristodoulou, P., Roskilly, A. P., Liu, W. T., Graham, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7
_version_ 1783357583821635584
author Zealand, A. M.
Mei, R.
Papachristodoulou, P.
Roskilly, A. P.
Liu, W. T.
Graham, David W.
author_facet Zealand, A. M.
Mei, R.
Papachristodoulou, P.
Roskilly, A. P.
Liu, W. T.
Graham, David W.
author_sort Zealand, A. M.
collection PubMed
description Anaerobic digestion (AD) uses a range of substrates to generate biogas, including energy crops such as globally abundant rice straw (RS). Unfortunately, RS is high in lignocellulosic material and has high to C:N ratios (~80:1), which makes it (alone) a comparatively poor substrate for AD. Co-digestion with dairy manure (DM) has been promoted as a method for balancing C:N ratios to improve RS AD whilst also treating another farm waste and co-producing a potentially useful fertiliser. However, past co-digestion studies have not directly compared RS AD microbial communities with and without DM additions, which has made it hard to assess all impacts of DM addition to RS AD processes. Here, four RS:DM ratios were contrasted in identical semi-continuous-fed AD bioreactors, and 100% RS was found to produce the highest specific methane yields (112 mL CH(4)/g VS/day; VS, volatile solids), which is over double yields achieved in the reactor with the highest DM content (30:70 RS:DM by mass; 48 mL CH(4)/g VS/day). To underpin these data, microbial communities were sequenced and characterised across the four reactors. Dominant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the 100% RS unit were Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes, whereas the 30:70 RS:DM unit was dominated by Proteobacteria/Spirochaetes, suggesting major microbial community shifts occur with DM additions. However, community richness was lowest with 100% RS (despite higher specific yields), suggesting particular OTUs may be more important to yields than microbial diversity. Further, ambient VFA and VS levels were significantly higher when no DM was added, suggesting DM-amended reactors may cope better with higher organic loading rates (OLR). Results show that RS AD without DM addition is feasible, although co-digestion with DM will probably allow higher OLRs, resulting in great RS throughput in farm AD units. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61538842018-10-04 Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure Zealand, A. M. Mei, R. Papachristodoulou, P. Roskilly, A. P. Liu, W. T. Graham, David W. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Bioenergy and Biofuels Anaerobic digestion (AD) uses a range of substrates to generate biogas, including energy crops such as globally abundant rice straw (RS). Unfortunately, RS is high in lignocellulosic material and has high to C:N ratios (~80:1), which makes it (alone) a comparatively poor substrate for AD. Co-digestion with dairy manure (DM) has been promoted as a method for balancing C:N ratios to improve RS AD whilst also treating another farm waste and co-producing a potentially useful fertiliser. However, past co-digestion studies have not directly compared RS AD microbial communities with and without DM additions, which has made it hard to assess all impacts of DM addition to RS AD processes. Here, four RS:DM ratios were contrasted in identical semi-continuous-fed AD bioreactors, and 100% RS was found to produce the highest specific methane yields (112 mL CH(4)/g VS/day; VS, volatile solids), which is over double yields achieved in the reactor with the highest DM content (30:70 RS:DM by mass; 48 mL CH(4)/g VS/day). To underpin these data, microbial communities were sequenced and characterised across the four reactors. Dominant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the 100% RS unit were Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes, whereas the 30:70 RS:DM unit was dominated by Proteobacteria/Spirochaetes, suggesting major microbial community shifts occur with DM additions. However, community richness was lowest with 100% RS (despite higher specific yields), suggesting particular OTUs may be more important to yields than microbial diversity. Further, ambient VFA and VS levels were significantly higher when no DM was added, suggesting DM-amended reactors may cope better with higher organic loading rates (OLR). Results show that RS AD without DM addition is feasible, although co-digestion with DM will probably allow higher OLRs, resulting in great RS throughput in farm AD units. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-27 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6153884/ /pubmed/30051138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Bioenergy and Biofuels
Zealand, A. M.
Mei, R.
Papachristodoulou, P.
Roskilly, A. P.
Liu, W. T.
Graham, David W.
Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title_full Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title_fullStr Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title_full_unstemmed Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title_short Microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
title_sort microbial community composition and diversity in rice straw digestion bioreactors with and without dairy manure
topic Bioenergy and Biofuels
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zealandam microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure
AT meir microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure
AT papachristodouloup microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure
AT roskillyap microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure
AT liuwt microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure
AT grahamdavidw microbialcommunitycompositionanddiversityinricestrawdigestionbioreactorswithandwithoutdairymanure