Cargando…

Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal

The purpose of this study was to evaluate four instruments with different working motion for preparation of a C-shaped single canal wall using the same artificial plastic models reproduced from a human tooth. One tooth with root canal morphology C1 (the shape is an uninterrupted “C” with no separati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekiya, Miki, Maeda, Munehiro, Katsuumi, Ichiroh, Igarashi, Masaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0348-3
_version_ 1783357606144770048
author Sekiya, Miki
Maeda, Munehiro
Katsuumi, Ichiroh
Igarashi, Masaru
author_facet Sekiya, Miki
Maeda, Munehiro
Katsuumi, Ichiroh
Igarashi, Masaru
author_sort Sekiya, Miki
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate four instruments with different working motion for preparation of a C-shaped single canal wall using the same artificial plastic models reproduced from a human tooth. One tooth with root canal morphology C1 (the shape is an uninterrupted “C” with no separation or division) was selected among three-dimensional micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging data of extracted human teeth. Imaging data were then converted into STL form data, and twenty-four C-shaped root canal model blocks were manufactured using this STL form data. These blocks were randomly divided into four groups of six blocks each and instrumented as follows: stainless steel K-files (SSK), Self-Adjusting File (SAF), ProTaper NEXT (PTN) and RECIPROC (REC). Micro-CT images taken before and after canal preparation were superimposed, and instrumented canal area, percentage of instrumented canal area, part of instrumented canal area, volume of instrumented canal and time taken for instrumentation were evaluated for each group. The greatest instrumented canal area, percentage of instrumented canal area and volume of instrumented canal were as follows (in decreasing order): SSK > SAF > PTN > REC (P < 0.05). The longest time taken for instrumentation was as follows (in decreasing order): SAF > SSK > PTN > REC (P < 0.05). The conscious shaping of SSK and the lattice structure of SAF were instrumented all root canal walls equally. PTN and REC required less time taken for instrumentation, but showed unequal instrumentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6153976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61539762018-10-04 Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal Sekiya, Miki Maeda, Munehiro Katsuumi, Ichiroh Igarashi, Masaru Odontology Original Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate four instruments with different working motion for preparation of a C-shaped single canal wall using the same artificial plastic models reproduced from a human tooth. One tooth with root canal morphology C1 (the shape is an uninterrupted “C” with no separation or division) was selected among three-dimensional micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging data of extracted human teeth. Imaging data were then converted into STL form data, and twenty-four C-shaped root canal model blocks were manufactured using this STL form data. These blocks were randomly divided into four groups of six blocks each and instrumented as follows: stainless steel K-files (SSK), Self-Adjusting File (SAF), ProTaper NEXT (PTN) and RECIPROC (REC). Micro-CT images taken before and after canal preparation were superimposed, and instrumented canal area, percentage of instrumented canal area, part of instrumented canal area, volume of instrumented canal and time taken for instrumentation were evaluated for each group. The greatest instrumented canal area, percentage of instrumented canal area and volume of instrumented canal were as follows (in decreasing order): SSK > SAF > PTN > REC (P < 0.05). The longest time taken for instrumentation was as follows (in decreasing order): SAF > SSK > PTN > REC (P < 0.05). The conscious shaping of SSK and the lattice structure of SAF were instrumented all root canal walls equally. PTN and REC required less time taken for instrumentation, but showed unequal instrumentation. Springer Japan 2018-02-10 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6153976/ /pubmed/29429057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0348-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sekiya, Miki
Maeda, Munehiro
Katsuumi, Ichiroh
Igarashi, Masaru
Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title_full Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title_fullStr Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title_short Evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with C-shaped single canal
title_sort evaluation of four instruments with different working motion using artificial plastic model with c-shaped single canal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0348-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sekiyamiki evaluationoffourinstrumentswithdifferentworkingmotionusingartificialplasticmodelwithcshapedsinglecanal
AT maedamunehiro evaluationoffourinstrumentswithdifferentworkingmotionusingartificialplasticmodelwithcshapedsinglecanal
AT katsuumiichiroh evaluationoffourinstrumentswithdifferentworkingmotionusingartificialplasticmodelwithcshapedsinglecanal
AT igarashimasaru evaluationoffourinstrumentswithdifferentworkingmotionusingartificialplasticmodelwithcshapedsinglecanal