Cargando…

Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets

Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dausset, Caroline, Patrier, Stéphane, Gajer, Pawel, Thoral, Claudia, Lenglet, Yann, Cardot, Jean-Michel, Judlin, Philippe, Ravel, Jacques, Nivoliez, Adrien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8
_version_ 1783357640498216960
author Dausset, Caroline
Patrier, Stéphane
Gajer, Pawel
Thoral, Claudia
Lenglet, Yann
Cardot, Jean-Michel
Judlin, Philippe
Ravel, Jacques
Nivoliez, Adrien
author_facet Dausset, Caroline
Patrier, Stéphane
Gajer, Pawel
Thoral, Claudia
Lenglet, Yann
Cardot, Jean-Michel
Judlin, Philippe
Ravel, Jacques
Nivoliez, Adrien
author_sort Dausset, Caroline
collection PubMed
description Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations (immediate release: IR capsule and slow release: SR muco-adhesive tablets) as well as the colonization of Lcr35(®) in healthy women. This phase I study (Comprigel) is a parallel, randomized, 4-arm, and open-label clinical trial evaluating an IR daily capsule formulation vs. a SR tablet administered every 3, 4, or 5 days for 21 days. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used to quantify Lcr35(®) and characterize the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota. Both LBPs were well-tolerated, and no severe adverse effects were reported. All groups had Lcr35(®) vaginal concentrations over 10(7) colony forming unit per milliliter of vaginal secretion on each day in the study. The new Gynophilus(®) slow release tablets administered either every 3, 4, or 5 days provided vaginal concentrations that were not significantly different from those of classic Gynophilus(®) (capsule) once-a-day regimen. The LBPs and the different regimens did not adversely influence the abundance of native Lactobacillus spp. and indeed tended to favor their growth and reduce colonization by non-Lactobacillus spp. This study illustrates that the SR muco-adhesive LBP tablet (Gynophilus(®) SR) administered every 3 or 4 days as a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative to a more demanding IR daily capsule and could protect women’s healthy vaginal microbiome by promoting endogenous Lactobacillus spp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6154122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61541222018-10-10 Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets Dausset, Caroline Patrier, Stéphane Gajer, Pawel Thoral, Claudia Lenglet, Yann Cardot, Jean-Michel Judlin, Philippe Ravel, Jacques Nivoliez, Adrien Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations (immediate release: IR capsule and slow release: SR muco-adhesive tablets) as well as the colonization of Lcr35(®) in healthy women. This phase I study (Comprigel) is a parallel, randomized, 4-arm, and open-label clinical trial evaluating an IR daily capsule formulation vs. a SR tablet administered every 3, 4, or 5 days for 21 days. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used to quantify Lcr35(®) and characterize the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota. Both LBPs were well-tolerated, and no severe adverse effects were reported. All groups had Lcr35(®) vaginal concentrations over 10(7) colony forming unit per milliliter of vaginal secretion on each day in the study. The new Gynophilus(®) slow release tablets administered either every 3, 4, or 5 days provided vaginal concentrations that were not significantly different from those of classic Gynophilus(®) (capsule) once-a-day regimen. The LBPs and the different regimens did not adversely influence the abundance of native Lactobacillus spp. and indeed tended to favor their growth and reduce colonization by non-Lactobacillus spp. This study illustrates that the SR muco-adhesive LBP tablet (Gynophilus(®) SR) administered every 3 or 4 days as a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative to a more demanding IR daily capsule and could protect women’s healthy vaginal microbiome by promoting endogenous Lactobacillus spp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6154122/ /pubmed/30032443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dausset, Caroline
Patrier, Stéphane
Gajer, Pawel
Thoral, Claudia
Lenglet, Yann
Cardot, Jean-Michel
Judlin, Philippe
Ravel, Jacques
Nivoliez, Adrien
Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title_full Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title_fullStr Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title_full_unstemmed Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title_short Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
title_sort comparative phase i randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of gynophilus(®) (lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8
work_keys_str_mv AT daussetcaroline comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT patrierstephane comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT gajerpawel comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT thoralclaudia comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT lengletyann comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT cardotjeanmichel comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT judlinphilippe comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT raveljacques comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets
AT nivoliezadrien comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets