Cargando…
Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets
Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8 |
_version_ | 1783357640498216960 |
---|---|
author | Dausset, Caroline Patrier, Stéphane Gajer, Pawel Thoral, Claudia Lenglet, Yann Cardot, Jean-Michel Judlin, Philippe Ravel, Jacques Nivoliez, Adrien |
author_facet | Dausset, Caroline Patrier, Stéphane Gajer, Pawel Thoral, Claudia Lenglet, Yann Cardot, Jean-Michel Judlin, Philippe Ravel, Jacques Nivoliez, Adrien |
author_sort | Dausset, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations (immediate release: IR capsule and slow release: SR muco-adhesive tablets) as well as the colonization of Lcr35(®) in healthy women. This phase I study (Comprigel) is a parallel, randomized, 4-arm, and open-label clinical trial evaluating an IR daily capsule formulation vs. a SR tablet administered every 3, 4, or 5 days for 21 days. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used to quantify Lcr35(®) and characterize the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota. Both LBPs were well-tolerated, and no severe adverse effects were reported. All groups had Lcr35(®) vaginal concentrations over 10(7) colony forming unit per milliliter of vaginal secretion on each day in the study. The new Gynophilus(®) slow release tablets administered either every 3, 4, or 5 days provided vaginal concentrations that were not significantly different from those of classic Gynophilus(®) (capsule) once-a-day regimen. The LBPs and the different regimens did not adversely influence the abundance of native Lactobacillus spp. and indeed tended to favor their growth and reduce colonization by non-Lactobacillus spp. This study illustrates that the SR muco-adhesive LBP tablet (Gynophilus(®) SR) administered every 3 or 4 days as a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative to a more demanding IR daily capsule and could protect women’s healthy vaginal microbiome by promoting endogenous Lactobacillus spp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6154122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61541222018-10-10 Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets Dausset, Caroline Patrier, Stéphane Gajer, Pawel Thoral, Claudia Lenglet, Yann Cardot, Jean-Michel Judlin, Philippe Ravel, Jacques Nivoliez, Adrien Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35(®), which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations (immediate release: IR capsule and slow release: SR muco-adhesive tablets) as well as the colonization of Lcr35(®) in healthy women. This phase I study (Comprigel) is a parallel, randomized, 4-arm, and open-label clinical trial evaluating an IR daily capsule formulation vs. a SR tablet administered every 3, 4, or 5 days for 21 days. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used to quantify Lcr35(®) and characterize the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota. Both LBPs were well-tolerated, and no severe adverse effects were reported. All groups had Lcr35(®) vaginal concentrations over 10(7) colony forming unit per milliliter of vaginal secretion on each day in the study. The new Gynophilus(®) slow release tablets administered either every 3, 4, or 5 days provided vaginal concentrations that were not significantly different from those of classic Gynophilus(®) (capsule) once-a-day regimen. The LBPs and the different regimens did not adversely influence the abundance of native Lactobacillus spp. and indeed tended to favor their growth and reduce colonization by non-Lactobacillus spp. This study illustrates that the SR muco-adhesive LBP tablet (Gynophilus(®) SR) administered every 3 or 4 days as a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative to a more demanding IR daily capsule and could protect women’s healthy vaginal microbiome by promoting endogenous Lactobacillus spp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6154122/ /pubmed/30032443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dausset, Caroline Patrier, Stéphane Gajer, Pawel Thoral, Claudia Lenglet, Yann Cardot, Jean-Michel Judlin, Philippe Ravel, Jacques Nivoliez, Adrien Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title | Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title_full | Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title_fullStr | Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title_short | Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus(®) (Lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
title_sort | comparative phase i randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of gynophilus(®) (lcr regenerans(®)) immediate release capsules versus slow release muco-adhesive tablets |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3321-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daussetcaroline comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT patrierstephane comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT gajerpawel comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT thoralclaudia comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT lengletyann comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT cardotjeanmichel comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT judlinphilippe comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT raveljacques comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets AT nivoliezadrien comparativephaseirandomizedopenlabelpilotclinicaltrialofgynophiluslcrregeneransimmediatereleasecapsulesversusslowreleasemucoadhesivetablets |