Cargando…
Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning
Clinical prediction of advanced hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis has long been challenging due to the gold standard, liver biopsy, being an invasive approach with certain limitations. Less invasive blood test tandem with a cutting-edge machine learning algorithm shows promising diagnostic potenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30100397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.041 |
_version_ | 1783357762163441664 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Runmin Wang, Jingye Wang, Xiaoning Xie, Guoxiang Wang, Yixing Zhang, Hua Peng, Cheng-Yuan Rajani, Cynthia Kwee, Sandi Liu, Ping Jia, Wei |
author_facet | Wei, Runmin Wang, Jingye Wang, Xiaoning Xie, Guoxiang Wang, Yixing Zhang, Hua Peng, Cheng-Yuan Rajani, Cynthia Kwee, Sandi Liu, Ping Jia, Wei |
author_sort | Wei, Runmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical prediction of advanced hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis has long been challenging due to the gold standard, liver biopsy, being an invasive approach with certain limitations. Less invasive blood test tandem with a cutting-edge machine learning algorithm shows promising diagnostic potential. In this study, we constructed and compared machine learning methods with the FIB-4 score in a discovery dataset (n = 490) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. Models were validated in an independent HBV dataset (n = 86). We further employed these models on two independent hepatitis C virus (HCV) datasets (n = 254 and 230) to examine their applicability. In the discovery data, gradient boosting (GB) stably outperformed other methods as well as FIB-4 scores (p < .001) in the prediction of advanced HF and cirrhosis. In the HBV validation dataset, for classification between early and advanced HF, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of GB model was 0.918, while FIB-4 was 0.841; for classification between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis, GB showed AUROC of 0.871, while FIB-4 was 0.830. Additionally, GB-based prediction demonstrated good classification capacity on two HCV datasets while higher cutoffs for both GB and FIB-4 scores were required to achieve comparable specificity and sensitivity. Using the same parameters as FIB-4, the GB-based prediction system demonstrated steady improvements relative to FIB-4 in HBV and HCV cohorts with different cutoff values required in different etiological groups. A user-friendly web tool, LiveBoost, makes our prediction models freely accessible for further clinical studies and applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6154783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61547832018-09-26 Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning Wei, Runmin Wang, Jingye Wang, Xiaoning Xie, Guoxiang Wang, Yixing Zhang, Hua Peng, Cheng-Yuan Rajani, Cynthia Kwee, Sandi Liu, Ping Jia, Wei EBioMedicine Research paper Clinical prediction of advanced hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis has long been challenging due to the gold standard, liver biopsy, being an invasive approach with certain limitations. Less invasive blood test tandem with a cutting-edge machine learning algorithm shows promising diagnostic potential. In this study, we constructed and compared machine learning methods with the FIB-4 score in a discovery dataset (n = 490) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. Models were validated in an independent HBV dataset (n = 86). We further employed these models on two independent hepatitis C virus (HCV) datasets (n = 254 and 230) to examine their applicability. In the discovery data, gradient boosting (GB) stably outperformed other methods as well as FIB-4 scores (p < .001) in the prediction of advanced HF and cirrhosis. In the HBV validation dataset, for classification between early and advanced HF, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of GB model was 0.918, while FIB-4 was 0.841; for classification between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis, GB showed AUROC of 0.871, while FIB-4 was 0.830. Additionally, GB-based prediction demonstrated good classification capacity on two HCV datasets while higher cutoffs for both GB and FIB-4 scores were required to achieve comparable specificity and sensitivity. Using the same parameters as FIB-4, the GB-based prediction system demonstrated steady improvements relative to FIB-4 in HBV and HCV cohorts with different cutoff values required in different etiological groups. A user-friendly web tool, LiveBoost, makes our prediction models freely accessible for further clinical studies and applications. Elsevier 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6154783/ /pubmed/30100397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.041 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research paper Wei, Runmin Wang, Jingye Wang, Xiaoning Xie, Guoxiang Wang, Yixing Zhang, Hua Peng, Cheng-Yuan Rajani, Cynthia Kwee, Sandi Liu, Ping Jia, Wei Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title_full | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title_short | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
title_sort | clinical prediction of hbv and hcv related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
topic | Research paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6154783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30100397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weirunmin clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT wangjingye clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT wangxiaoning clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT xieguoxiang clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT wangyixing clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT zhanghua clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT pengchengyuan clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT rajanicynthia clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT kweesandi clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT liuping clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning AT jiawei clinicalpredictionofhbvandhcvrelatedhepaticfibrosisusingmachinelearning |