Cargando…
Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9 |
_version_ | 1783357861495046144 |
---|---|
author | Lopez, Anna Lena Daag, Jedas Veronica Esparagoza, Joel Bonifacio, Joseph Fox, Kimberley Nyambat, Batmunkh Parashar, Umesh D. Ducusin, Maria Joyce Tate, Jacqueline E. |
author_facet | Lopez, Anna Lena Daag, Jedas Veronica Esparagoza, Joel Bonifacio, Joseph Fox, Kimberley Nyambat, Batmunkh Parashar, Umesh D. Ducusin, Maria Joyce Tate, Jacqueline E. |
author_sort | Lopez, Anna Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and 10 weeks of age. We conducted a test negative case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of RVV when given in a routine public health program in the Philippines. From September 2014 to August 2017, 967 children aged <5 years were hospitalized with diarrhea and of these, we enrolled 600 who were eligible to have received RVV and provided stool specimens for testing. Among children ≥8 months of age who were age-eligible to have received RVV, at least one dose of RVV had an adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against RV hospitalization of 60% (95% confidence interval, CI: 24%, 79%), and against severe rotavirus diarrhea, VE was 64% (95% CI: 11%, 85%). These findings support the introduction of RVV into routine public health use in the Philippines. However, other factors such as costs, cost-effectiveness and operational issues must be considered prior to adoption of the vaccine into the countries’ public immunization program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6155259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61552592018-09-28 Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines Lopez, Anna Lena Daag, Jedas Veronica Esparagoza, Joel Bonifacio, Joseph Fox, Kimberley Nyambat, Batmunkh Parashar, Umesh D. Ducusin, Maria Joyce Tate, Jacqueline E. Sci Rep Article Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and 10 weeks of age. We conducted a test negative case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of RVV when given in a routine public health program in the Philippines. From September 2014 to August 2017, 967 children aged <5 years were hospitalized with diarrhea and of these, we enrolled 600 who were eligible to have received RVV and provided stool specimens for testing. Among children ≥8 months of age who were age-eligible to have received RVV, at least one dose of RVV had an adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against RV hospitalization of 60% (95% confidence interval, CI: 24%, 79%), and against severe rotavirus diarrhea, VE was 64% (95% CI: 11%, 85%). These findings support the introduction of RVV into routine public health use in the Philippines. However, other factors such as costs, cost-effectiveness and operational issues must be considered prior to adoption of the vaccine into the countries’ public immunization program. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6155259/ /pubmed/30250267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lopez, Anna Lena Daag, Jedas Veronica Esparagoza, Joel Bonifacio, Joseph Fox, Kimberley Nyambat, Batmunkh Parashar, Umesh D. Ducusin, Maria Joyce Tate, Jacqueline E. Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title | Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title_full | Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title_short | Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines |
title_sort | effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the philippines |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezannalena effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT daagjedasveronica effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT esparagozajoel effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT bonifaciojoseph effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT foxkimberley effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT nyambatbatmunkh effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT parasharumeshd effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT ducusinmariajoyce effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines AT tatejacquelinee effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines |