Cargando…

Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines

Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez, Anna Lena, Daag, Jedas Veronica, Esparagoza, Joel, Bonifacio, Joseph, Fox, Kimberley, Nyambat, Batmunkh, Parashar, Umesh D., Ducusin, Maria Joyce, Tate, Jacqueline E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9
_version_ 1783357861495046144
author Lopez, Anna Lena
Daag, Jedas Veronica
Esparagoza, Joel
Bonifacio, Joseph
Fox, Kimberley
Nyambat, Batmunkh
Parashar, Umesh D.
Ducusin, Maria Joyce
Tate, Jacqueline E.
author_facet Lopez, Anna Lena
Daag, Jedas Veronica
Esparagoza, Joel
Bonifacio, Joseph
Fox, Kimberley
Nyambat, Batmunkh
Parashar, Umesh D.
Ducusin, Maria Joyce
Tate, Jacqueline E.
author_sort Lopez, Anna Lena
collection PubMed
description Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and 10 weeks of age. We conducted a test negative case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of RVV when given in a routine public health program in the Philippines. From September 2014 to August 2017, 967 children aged <5 years were hospitalized with diarrhea and of these, we enrolled 600 who were eligible to have received RVV and provided stool specimens for testing. Among children ≥8 months of age who were age-eligible to have received RVV, at least one dose of RVV had an adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against RV hospitalization of 60% (95% confidence interval, CI: 24%, 79%), and against severe rotavirus diarrhea, VE was 64% (95% CI: 11%, 85%). These findings support the introduction of RVV into routine public health use in the Philippines. However, other factors such as costs, cost-effectiveness and operational issues must be considered prior to adoption of the vaccine into the countries’ public immunization program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6155259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61552592018-09-28 Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines Lopez, Anna Lena Daag, Jedas Veronica Esparagoza, Joel Bonifacio, Joseph Fox, Kimberley Nyambat, Batmunkh Parashar, Umesh D. Ducusin, Maria Joyce Tate, Jacqueline E. Sci Rep Article Rotavirus (RV) is an important cause of diarrheal disease particularly in children aged under 5 years. Monovalent RV vaccine (RVV) was selectively introduced in 2012 in the Philippines and in July 2014 was introduced in the public health program of a province. Two RVV doses are recommended at 6 and 10 weeks of age. We conducted a test negative case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of RVV when given in a routine public health program in the Philippines. From September 2014 to August 2017, 967 children aged <5 years were hospitalized with diarrhea and of these, we enrolled 600 who were eligible to have received RVV and provided stool specimens for testing. Among children ≥8 months of age who were age-eligible to have received RVV, at least one dose of RVV had an adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against RV hospitalization of 60% (95% confidence interval, CI: 24%, 79%), and against severe rotavirus diarrhea, VE was 64% (95% CI: 11%, 85%). These findings support the introduction of RVV into routine public health use in the Philippines. However, other factors such as costs, cost-effectiveness and operational issues must be considered prior to adoption of the vaccine into the countries’ public immunization program. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6155259/ /pubmed/30250267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lopez, Anna Lena
Daag, Jedas Veronica
Esparagoza, Joel
Bonifacio, Joseph
Fox, Kimberley
Nyambat, Batmunkh
Parashar, Umesh D.
Ducusin, Maria Joyce
Tate, Jacqueline E.
Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title_full Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title_fullStr Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title_short Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the Philippines
title_sort effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in the philippines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32595-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezannalena effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT daagjedasveronica effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT esparagozajoel effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT bonifaciojoseph effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT foxkimberley effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT nyambatbatmunkh effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT parasharumeshd effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT ducusinmariajoyce effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines
AT tatejacquelinee effectivenessofmonovalentrotavirusvaccineinthephilippines