Cargando…

Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a promising steroid sparing agent used in the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Its exact place in the algorithm of pemphigus treatment, vis-à-vis other, conventional adjuvant therapy (CAT) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare disease course out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Ashwin, Hall, Russell P., Bañez, Lionel L., Cardones, Adela R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30252855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198074
_version_ 1783357909381414912
author Agarwal, Ashwin
Hall, Russell P.
Bañez, Lionel L.
Cardones, Adela R.
author_facet Agarwal, Ashwin
Hall, Russell P.
Bañez, Lionel L.
Cardones, Adela R.
author_sort Agarwal, Ashwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a promising steroid sparing agent used in the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Its exact place in the algorithm of pemphigus treatment, vis-à-vis other, conventional adjuvant therapy (CAT) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare disease course outcomes and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe pemphigus who received rituximab therapy (RT) in addition to prednisone and CAT, versus those who were treated with prednisone and CAT alone. METHODS: A 16-year retrospective case control study was designed with adult patients who were seen at the Duke University Dermatology Immunodermatology clinic from 1999–2015, who had a diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris, and required prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. All patients had at least 6 months follow up from the initial visit. Interventions included RT, systemic CAT, and prednisone. The main outcome measured was prednisone intake. Secondary outcomes were complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR). RESULTS: 40 patients were included in the study. All initially received prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. 13/40 eventually went on to receive RT, while 27/40 remained on CAT (CAT-only). Patients in the RT group, pre-RT, had a median prednisone intake of 658.57 mg/month. Rituximab treatment significantly reduced this to 177.22 mg/month (p = 0.002). Median prednisone intake of the CAT-only group was 141.33 mg/month. This was significantly less than Pre-RT (p = 0.01) and on par with Post-RT intake (p = 0.58). 54% of patients in the RT group and 64% of those in the CAT-only group achieved CR. All patients in the RT group and 96% of those in the CAT-only group achieved at least PR. CONCLUSIONS: 32.5% of our patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris failed prednisone and traditional CAT treatment and required rituximab therapy. Rituximab reduced the monthly prednisone intake in these patients by 73%. This suggests that a subset of patients with moderate to severe pemphigus may benefit from early institution of rituximab therapy. Rituximab significantly reduces the monthly prednisone requirement among CAT-resistant pemphigus vulgaris patients to levels on par with CAT-responsive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6155499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61554992018-10-19 Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis Agarwal, Ashwin Hall, Russell P. Bañez, Lionel L. Cardones, Adela R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a promising steroid sparing agent used in the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Its exact place in the algorithm of pemphigus treatment, vis-à-vis other, conventional adjuvant therapy (CAT) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare disease course outcomes and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe pemphigus who received rituximab therapy (RT) in addition to prednisone and CAT, versus those who were treated with prednisone and CAT alone. METHODS: A 16-year retrospective case control study was designed with adult patients who were seen at the Duke University Dermatology Immunodermatology clinic from 1999–2015, who had a diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris, and required prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. All patients had at least 6 months follow up from the initial visit. Interventions included RT, systemic CAT, and prednisone. The main outcome measured was prednisone intake. Secondary outcomes were complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR). RESULTS: 40 patients were included in the study. All initially received prednisone and at least 1 systemic CAT. 13/40 eventually went on to receive RT, while 27/40 remained on CAT (CAT-only). Patients in the RT group, pre-RT, had a median prednisone intake of 658.57 mg/month. Rituximab treatment significantly reduced this to 177.22 mg/month (p = 0.002). Median prednisone intake of the CAT-only group was 141.33 mg/month. This was significantly less than Pre-RT (p = 0.01) and on par with Post-RT intake (p = 0.58). 54% of patients in the RT group and 64% of those in the CAT-only group achieved CR. All patients in the RT group and 96% of those in the CAT-only group achieved at least PR. CONCLUSIONS: 32.5% of our patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris failed prednisone and traditional CAT treatment and required rituximab therapy. Rituximab reduced the monthly prednisone intake in these patients by 73%. This suggests that a subset of patients with moderate to severe pemphigus may benefit from early institution of rituximab therapy. Rituximab significantly reduces the monthly prednisone requirement among CAT-resistant pemphigus vulgaris patients to levels on par with CAT-responsive patients. Public Library of Science 2018-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6155499/ /pubmed/30252855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198074 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agarwal, Ashwin
Hall, Russell P.
Bañez, Lionel L.
Cardones, Adela R.
Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title_full Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title_short Comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective analysis
title_sort comparison of rituximab and conventional adjuvant therapy for pemphigus vulgaris: a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6155499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30252855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198074
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalashwin comparisonofrituximabandconventionaladjuvanttherapyforpemphigusvulgarisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hallrussellp comparisonofrituximabandconventionaladjuvanttherapyforpemphigusvulgarisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT banezlionell comparisonofrituximabandconventionaladjuvanttherapyforpemphigusvulgarisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT cardonesadelar comparisonofrituximabandconventionaladjuvanttherapyforpemphigusvulgarisaretrospectiveanalysis