Cargando…

Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal

[Image: see text] Biogas is one of the most popular alternative energy resources to replace fossil fuels. The product of anaerobic fermentation in a digester contains several impurities such as H(2)S and especially CO(2) that needs to be removed in order to upgrade the gas quality. Supported amine s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bos, Martin J., Kroeze, Vincent, Sutanto, Stevia, Brilman, Derk W. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6156101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30270978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00768
_version_ 1783358032964485120
author Bos, Martin J.
Kroeze, Vincent
Sutanto, Stevia
Brilman, Derk W. F.
author_facet Bos, Martin J.
Kroeze, Vincent
Sutanto, Stevia
Brilman, Derk W. F.
author_sort Bos, Martin J.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Biogas is one of the most popular alternative energy resources to replace fossil fuels. The product of anaerobic fermentation in a digester contains several impurities such as H(2)S and especially CO(2) that needs to be removed in order to upgrade the gas quality. Supported amine sorbents (SAS) might provide an attractive option to remove these impurities. However, little is known about the regeneration of the sorbent. This study evaluates experimentally and by modeling the options for regeneration of the SAS. Theoretically, pressure swing adsorption without purge flow is the most energy efficient method (1.7 MJ/kg CO(2)). It was found that when using a purge flow the desorption rate is strongly influenced by the equilibrium between the gas and adsorbed phase. With elevated temperature (>80 °C) both the working capacity and the productivity increase significantly. Finally, an energy evaluation for a typical biogas case study is carried out, showing the trade-offs between power consumption, heat demand, and sorbent inventory. Interestingly, at the expense of a somewhat higher power consumption, the use of inexpensive air as purge gas at 60 °C could be an attractive option, but case-specific costs are needed to identify the economic optimum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6156101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61561012018-09-27 Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal Bos, Martin J. Kroeze, Vincent Sutanto, Stevia Brilman, Derk W. F. Ind Eng Chem Res [Image: see text] Biogas is one of the most popular alternative energy resources to replace fossil fuels. The product of anaerobic fermentation in a digester contains several impurities such as H(2)S and especially CO(2) that needs to be removed in order to upgrade the gas quality. Supported amine sorbents (SAS) might provide an attractive option to remove these impurities. However, little is known about the regeneration of the sorbent. This study evaluates experimentally and by modeling the options for regeneration of the SAS. Theoretically, pressure swing adsorption without purge flow is the most energy efficient method (1.7 MJ/kg CO(2)). It was found that when using a purge flow the desorption rate is strongly influenced by the equilibrium between the gas and adsorbed phase. With elevated temperature (>80 °C) both the working capacity and the productivity increase significantly. Finally, an energy evaluation for a typical biogas case study is carried out, showing the trade-offs between power consumption, heat demand, and sorbent inventory. Interestingly, at the expense of a somewhat higher power consumption, the use of inexpensive air as purge gas at 60 °C could be an attractive option, but case-specific costs are needed to identify the economic optimum. American Chemical Society 2018-08-01 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6156101/ /pubmed/30270978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00768 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Bos, Martin J.
Kroeze, Vincent
Sutanto, Stevia
Brilman, Derk W. F.
Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title_full Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title_fullStr Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title_short Evaluating Regeneration Options of Solid Amine Sorbent for CO(2) Removal
title_sort evaluating regeneration options of solid amine sorbent for co(2) removal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6156101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30270978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00768
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmartinj evaluatingregenerationoptionsofsolidaminesorbentforco2removal
AT kroezevincent evaluatingregenerationoptionsofsolidaminesorbentforco2removal
AT sutantostevia evaluatingregenerationoptionsofsolidaminesorbentforco2removal
AT brilmanderkwf evaluatingregenerationoptionsofsolidaminesorbentforco2removal