Cargando…

Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong

We studied how teams of two players of different skill level intercepted approaching balls in the doubles-pong task. In this task, the two players moved their on-screen paddles along a shared interception axis, so that the approaching ball was intercepted by one of the paddles and that the paddles d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne), Benerink, Niek H., Zaal, Frank T. J. M., Casanova, Remy, Bootsma, Reinoud J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6156536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01731
_version_ 1783358125635534848
author van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne)
Benerink, Niek H.
Zaal, Frank T. J. M.
Casanova, Remy
Bootsma, Reinoud J.
author_facet van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne)
Benerink, Niek H.
Zaal, Frank T. J. M.
Casanova, Remy
Bootsma, Reinoud J.
author_sort van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne)
collection PubMed
description We studied how teams of two players of different skill level intercepted approaching balls in the doubles-pong task. In this task, the two players moved their on-screen paddles along a shared interception axis, so that the approaching ball was intercepted by one of the paddles and that the paddles did not collide. Earlier work revealed the presence of a fuzzy division of interception space, with a boundary between interception domains located in the space between the two initial paddle positions. In the present study, using the performance of the players in their individual training sessions, we formed teams of players of varying skill level. We considered two accounts of how this boundary should be understood. In a first account, the players have shared knowledge of this boundary. Based on the side of the boundary at which the approaching ball will cross the interception axis, the players would decide whose paddle is to make the interception. Under this account, we expected that a better-skilled player would take responsibility for a larger interception domain, leading to a boundary closer to the lesser-skilled player. However, our analyses did not reveal any systematic effect of skill difference on the location (or degree of fuzziness) of the boundary: location of boundaries and overlap of interception domains varied over teams but were not systematically related to skill differences between team members. We did find effects of ball speed and approach angle. In a second account, the boundary emerges from (information-driven) player–player–ball interactions. An action-based model consistent with this account was able to capture all the patterns in boundary positions and overlaps that we observed. We conclude that the interception patterns that players demonstrate in the doubles-pong task are best understood as emerging from the unfolding of the dynamics of the system of the two players and the ball, coupled through information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6156536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61565362018-10-03 Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne) Benerink, Niek H. Zaal, Frank T. J. M. Casanova, Remy Bootsma, Reinoud J. Front Psychol Psychology We studied how teams of two players of different skill level intercepted approaching balls in the doubles-pong task. In this task, the two players moved their on-screen paddles along a shared interception axis, so that the approaching ball was intercepted by one of the paddles and that the paddles did not collide. Earlier work revealed the presence of a fuzzy division of interception space, with a boundary between interception domains located in the space between the two initial paddle positions. In the present study, using the performance of the players in their individual training sessions, we formed teams of players of varying skill level. We considered two accounts of how this boundary should be understood. In a first account, the players have shared knowledge of this boundary. Based on the side of the boundary at which the approaching ball will cross the interception axis, the players would decide whose paddle is to make the interception. Under this account, we expected that a better-skilled player would take responsibility for a larger interception domain, leading to a boundary closer to the lesser-skilled player. However, our analyses did not reveal any systematic effect of skill difference on the location (or degree of fuzziness) of the boundary: location of boundaries and overlap of interception domains varied over teams but were not systematically related to skill differences between team members. We did find effects of ball speed and approach angle. In a second account, the boundary emerges from (information-driven) player–player–ball interactions. An action-based model consistent with this account was able to capture all the patterns in boundary positions and overlaps that we observed. We conclude that the interception patterns that players demonstrate in the doubles-pong task are best understood as emerging from the unfolding of the dynamics of the system of the two players and the ball, coupled through information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6156536/ /pubmed/30283383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01731 Text en Copyright © 2018 van Opstal, Benerink, Zaal, Casanova and Bootsma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
van Opstal, A. A. M. (Daphne)
Benerink, Niek H.
Zaal, Frank T. J. M.
Casanova, Remy
Bootsma, Reinoud J.
Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title_full Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title_fullStr Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title_full_unstemmed Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title_short Information-Based Social Coordination Between Players of Different Skill in Doubles Pong
title_sort information-based social coordination between players of different skill in doubles pong
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6156536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01731
work_keys_str_mv AT vanopstalaamdaphne informationbasedsocialcoordinationbetweenplayersofdifferentskillindoublespong
AT benerinkniekh informationbasedsocialcoordinationbetweenplayersofdifferentskillindoublespong
AT zaalfranktjm informationbasedsocialcoordinationbetweenplayersofdifferentskillindoublespong
AT casanovaremy informationbasedsocialcoordinationbetweenplayersofdifferentskillindoublespong
AT bootsmareinoudj informationbasedsocialcoordinationbetweenplayersofdifferentskillindoublespong