Cargando…
Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Laparoscopy is widely used in the urological field. This systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to assess the clinical and surgical efficacy of the three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic system in comparison with two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy for treatment of different urol...
Autores principales: | Dirie, Najib Isse, Wang, Qing, Wang, Shaogang |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6156697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29969912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0411 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in adults: A single surgeon experience and literature review
por: Dirie, Najib Isse, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Management of recurrent ureteral stricture: a retrospectively comparative study with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open approach
por: Wang, Qing, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: A randomized study
por: Patankar, Suresh B., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
por: Shaikh, Abdul Razaque, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Cheng, Ji, et al.
Publicado: (2016)