Cargando…

Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach

MOTIVATION: The identification of biomarkers to support decision-making is central to personalized medicine, in both clinical and research scenarios. The challenge can be seen in two halves: identifying predictive markers, which guide the development/use of tailored therapies; and identifying progno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sechidis, Konstantinos, Papangelou, Konstantinos, Metcalfe, Paul D, Svensson, David, Weatherall, James, Brown, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29726967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty357
_version_ 1783358208998375424
author Sechidis, Konstantinos
Papangelou, Konstantinos
Metcalfe, Paul D
Svensson, David
Weatherall, James
Brown, Gavin
author_facet Sechidis, Konstantinos
Papangelou, Konstantinos
Metcalfe, Paul D
Svensson, David
Weatherall, James
Brown, Gavin
author_sort Sechidis, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: The identification of biomarkers to support decision-making is central to personalized medicine, in both clinical and research scenarios. The challenge can be seen in two halves: identifying predictive markers, which guide the development/use of tailored therapies; and identifying prognostic markers, which guide other aspects of care and clinical trial planning, i.e. prognostic markers can be considered as covariates for stratification. Mistakenly assuming a biomarker to be predictive, when it is in fact largely prognostic (and vice-versa) is highly undesirable, and can result in financial, ethical and personal consequences. We present a framework for data-driven ranking of biomarkers on their prognostic/predictive strength, using a novel information theoretic method. This approach provides a natural algebra to discuss and quantify the individual predictive and prognostic strength, in a self-consistent mathematical framework. RESULTS: Our contribution is a novel procedure, INFO+, which naturally distinguishes the prognostic versus predictive role of each biomarker and handles higher order interactions. In a comprehensive empirical evaluation INFO+ outperforms more complex methods, most notably when noise factors dominate, and biomarkers are likely to be falsely identified as predictive, when in fact they are just strongly prognostic. Furthermore, we show that our methods can be 1–3 orders of magnitude faster than competitors, making it useful for biomarker discovery in ‘big data’ scenarios. Finally, we apply our methods to identify predictive biomarkers on two real clinical trials, and introduce a new graphical representation that provides greater insight into the prognostic and predictive strength of each biomarker. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R implementations of the suggested methods are available at https://github.com/sechidis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61570982018-10-01 Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach Sechidis, Konstantinos Papangelou, Konstantinos Metcalfe, Paul D Svensson, David Weatherall, James Brown, Gavin Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: The identification of biomarkers to support decision-making is central to personalized medicine, in both clinical and research scenarios. The challenge can be seen in two halves: identifying predictive markers, which guide the development/use of tailored therapies; and identifying prognostic markers, which guide other aspects of care and clinical trial planning, i.e. prognostic markers can be considered as covariates for stratification. Mistakenly assuming a biomarker to be predictive, when it is in fact largely prognostic (and vice-versa) is highly undesirable, and can result in financial, ethical and personal consequences. We present a framework for data-driven ranking of biomarkers on their prognostic/predictive strength, using a novel information theoretic method. This approach provides a natural algebra to discuss and quantify the individual predictive and prognostic strength, in a self-consistent mathematical framework. RESULTS: Our contribution is a novel procedure, INFO+, which naturally distinguishes the prognostic versus predictive role of each biomarker and handles higher order interactions. In a comprehensive empirical evaluation INFO+ outperforms more complex methods, most notably when noise factors dominate, and biomarkers are likely to be falsely identified as predictive, when in fact they are just strongly prognostic. Furthermore, we show that our methods can be 1–3 orders of magnitude faster than competitors, making it useful for biomarker discovery in ‘big data’ scenarios. Finally, we apply our methods to identify predictive biomarkers on two real clinical trials, and introduce a new graphical representation that provides greater insight into the prognostic and predictive strength of each biomarker. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R implementations of the suggested methods are available at https://github.com/sechidis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2018-10-01 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6157098/ /pubmed/29726967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty357 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Sechidis, Konstantinos
Papangelou, Konstantinos
Metcalfe, Paul D
Svensson, David
Weatherall, James
Brown, Gavin
Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title_full Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title_fullStr Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title_full_unstemmed Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title_short Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
title_sort distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29726967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty357
work_keys_str_mv AT sechidiskonstantinos distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach
AT papangeloukonstantinos distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach
AT metcalfepauld distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach
AT svenssondavid distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach
AT weatheralljames distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach
AT browngavin distinguishingprognosticandpredictivebiomarkersaninformationtheoreticapproach