Cargando…

MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Cong, Song, Gang, Wang, He, Ji, Guangjie, Li, Jie, Chen, Yuke, Fan, Yu, Fang, Dong, Xiong, Gengyan, Xin, Zhongcheng, Zhou, Liqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6368309
_version_ 1783358212835115008
author Huang, Cong
Song, Gang
Wang, He
Ji, Guangjie
Li, Jie
Chen, Yuke
Fan, Yu
Fang, Dong
Xiong, Gengyan
Xin, Zhongcheng
Zhou, Liqun
author_facet Huang, Cong
Song, Gang
Wang, He
Ji, Guangjie
Li, Jie
Chen, Yuke
Fan, Yu
Fang, Dong
Xiong, Gengyan
Xin, Zhongcheng
Zhou, Liqun
author_sort Huang, Cong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological parameters of 231 patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy and mpMRI were reviewed. Based on Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System, the mpMRI results were assigned into three groups: Groups “negative,” “suspicious,” and “positive.” Two clinical nomograms for predicting the probabilities of PCa and csPCa were constructed. The performances of nomograms were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), calibrations, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The median PSA was 15.03 ng/ml and abnormal DRE was presented in 14.3% of patients in the entire cohort. PCa was detected in 75 patients (32.5%), and 59 (25.5%) were diagnosed with csPCa. In multivariate analysis, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE), and mpMRI finding were significantly independent predictors for PCa and csPCa (all p < 0.01). Of those patients diagnosed with PCa or csPCa, 20/75 (26.7%) and 18/59 (30.5%) had abnormal DRE finding, respectively. Two mpMRI-based nomograms with super predictive accuracy were constructed (AUCs = 0.878 and 0.927, p < 0.001), and both exhibited excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis also demonstrated a high net benefit across a wide range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSION: mpMRI combined with age, PSA, PV, and DRE can help predict the probability of PCa and csPCa in patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy after a previous negative biopsy. The two nomograms may aid the decision-making process in men with prior benign histology before the performance of repeat prostate biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61571142018-10-01 MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy Huang, Cong Song, Gang Wang, He Ji, Guangjie Li, Jie Chen, Yuke Fan, Yu Fang, Dong Xiong, Gengyan Xin, Zhongcheng Zhou, Liqun Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological parameters of 231 patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy and mpMRI were reviewed. Based on Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System, the mpMRI results were assigned into three groups: Groups “negative,” “suspicious,” and “positive.” Two clinical nomograms for predicting the probabilities of PCa and csPCa were constructed. The performances of nomograms were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), calibrations, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The median PSA was 15.03 ng/ml and abnormal DRE was presented in 14.3% of patients in the entire cohort. PCa was detected in 75 patients (32.5%), and 59 (25.5%) were diagnosed with csPCa. In multivariate analysis, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE), and mpMRI finding were significantly independent predictors for PCa and csPCa (all p < 0.01). Of those patients diagnosed with PCa or csPCa, 20/75 (26.7%) and 18/59 (30.5%) had abnormal DRE finding, respectively. Two mpMRI-based nomograms with super predictive accuracy were constructed (AUCs = 0.878 and 0.927, p < 0.001), and both exhibited excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis also demonstrated a high net benefit across a wide range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSION: mpMRI combined with age, PSA, PV, and DRE can help predict the probability of PCa and csPCa in patients who underwent a repeat systematic prostate biopsy after a previous negative biopsy. The two nomograms may aid the decision-making process in men with prior benign histology before the performance of repeat prostate biopsy. Hindawi 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6157114/ /pubmed/30276213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6368309 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cong Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Cong
Song, Gang
Wang, He
Ji, Guangjie
Li, Jie
Chen, Yuke
Fan, Yu
Fang, Dong
Xiong, Gengyan
Xin, Zhongcheng
Zhou, Liqun
MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title_full MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title_fullStr MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title_short MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
title_sort multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6368309
work_keys_str_mv AT huangcong multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT songgang multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT wanghe multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT jiguangjie multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT lijie multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT chenyuke multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT fanyu multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT fangdong multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT xionggengyan multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT xinzhongcheng multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy
AT zhouliqun multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramforpredictingprostatecancerandclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinmenundergoingrepeatprostatebiopsy